Irena Marie Hlaváčová

Dr. Irena Marie Hlaváčová

VŠB-TUO, Ostrava, Moravskoslezský Kraj, Czech Republic
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

18Years (2009-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
19 November 2009 in Journal of Materials Processing Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LHLibor Method Hlavac
Libor Method Hlavac
IHIrena Marie Hlaváčová
Irena Marie Hlaváčová
LGL. Gembalová
L. Gembalová
JKJ. Kaličinský
J. Kaličinský
SFS. Fabian
S. Fabian
VMV. Mádr
V. Mádr

20 September 2016 in The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
IHIrena Marie Hlaváčová
Irena Marie Hlaváčová
VGV. Geryk
V. Geryk

29 December 2015 in The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LHLibor Method Hlavac
Libor Method Hlavac
RKRadim Kocich
Radim Kocich
LGLucie Gembalová
Lucie Gembalová
PJPetr Jonšta
Petr Jonšta
IHIrena Marie Hlaváčová
Irena Marie Hlaváčová

19 November 2014 in The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LHLibor Method Hlavac
Libor Method Hlavac
IHIrena Marie Hlaváčová
Irena Marie Hlaváčová
VGVladan Geryk
Vladan Geryk
ŠPŠtefan Plančár
Štefan Plančár

1 July 2010 in International Journal of Mineral Processing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LHLibor Method Hlavac
Libor Method Hlavac
IHIrena Marie Hlaváčová
Irena Marie Hlaváčová
PJPetr Jandačka
Petr Jandačka
JZJiří Zegzulka
Jiří Zegzulka
JVJana Viliamsová
Jana Viliamsová
VMVilém Mádr
Vilém Mádr

5 October 2020 in Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
IHIrena Marie Hlaváčová
Irena Marie Hlaváčová
MSMarek Sadílek
Marek Sadílek
PVPetra Váňová
Petra Váňová
ŠSŠtefan Szumilo
Štefan Szumilo
MTMartin Tyč
Martin Tyč
Although the abrasive waterjet (AWJ) has been widely used for steel cutting for decades and there are hundreds of research papers or even books dealing with this technology, relatively little is known about the relation between the steel microstructure and the AWJ cutting efficiency. The steel microstructure can be significantly affected by heat treatment. Three different steel grades, carbon steel C45, micro-alloyed steel 37MnSi5 and low-alloy steel 30CrV9, were subjected to four different types of heat treatment: normalization annealing, soft annealing, quenching and quenching followed by tempering. Then, they were cut by an abrasive water jet, while identical cutting parameters were applied. The relations between the mechanical characteristics of heat-treated steels and the surface roughness parameters Ra, Rz and RSm were studied. A comparison of changes in the surface roughness parameters and Young modulus variation led to the conclusion that the modulus was not significantly responsible for the surface roughness. The changes of RSm did not prove any correlation to either the mechanical characteristics or the visible microstructure dimensions. The homogeneity of the steel microstructure appeared to be the most important factor for the cutting quality; the higher the difference in the hardness of the structural components in the inhomogeneous microstructure was, the higher were the roughness values. A more complex measurement and critical evaluation of the declination angle measurement compared to the surface roughness measurement are planned in future research.