BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common cardiac rhythm disorder associated with hemodynamic disruptions and thromboembolic events. While antiarrhythmic drugs are often recommended as the initial treatment, catheter ablation has emerged as a viable alternative. However, the recurrence of AF following ablation remains a challenge, and there is growing interest in exploring inflammatory markers as predictors of recurrence. METHODS: This retrospective, cross-sectional analysis included 249 patients who underwent cryoablation for paroxysmal AF. The relationship between the ‘C-reactive protein (CRP) to albumin ratio (CAR)’ and AF recurrence was examined. RESULTS: Two hundred and forty-nine patients with paroxysmal non-valvular atrial fibrillation were included. They were divided into two groups: those without recurrence (Group 1) and those with recurrence (Group 2). Significant differences were observed in age (57.2 ± 9.9 vs. 62.5 ± 8.4, p = 0.001) and left atrial size (4.0 ± 0.5 vs. 4.2 ± 0.7, p = 0.001) between the two groups. In blood parameters, significant differences were found in CRP (5.2 ± 1.3 vs. 9.4 ± 2.8, p < 0.001) and neutrophil counts (5.1 ± 2.2 vs. 6.7 ± 3.6, p = 0.001). In univariate regression analysis, age (OR: 1.058, CI: 1.024–1.093, p = 0.001), WBC count (OR: 1.201, CI: 1.092–1.322, p < 0.001), neutrophil count (OR: 1.239, CI: 1.114–1.378, p = 0.001), CAR (OR: 1.409, CI: 1.183–1.678, p < 0.001), and left atrial diameter (OR: 0.968, CI: 0.948–0.989, p = 0.002) showed significant associations with AF recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Inflammation plays a crucial role in the initiation and progression of AF. This study demonstrated that along with age, the CAR can serve as an independent predictor of AF recurrence following cryoablation.

Novel coronavirus 19 infection (COVID-19) has become a global pandemic and Turkey had the first coronavirus patient tested positive in 10 March 2020. In this analysis we have discussed the characteristics of Turkish patients who have been hospitalized for COVID-19 infection. Cross sectional study Methods: This retrospective study included all the patients who have been hospitalized for novel coronavirus at blinded for peer review -Department of Internal Medicine between 15th March 2020 and 28th March 2020. Patients were screened with real time PCR (2019nCoV), chest X-ray and computer tomography. Also, their demographic characteristics including sex, age, occupation, comorbid disease etc. were recorded. There were 70 patients for analysis. Thirty-seven patients (52.9 %) tested positive for coronavirus infection with PCR. Mean age was 55.8 (min 24- max 87). There were 49 men (70.0%). Two patients (2%) were sent home and eleven patients (15.7%) were transferred to intensive care unit (ICU). Patients in ICU had statistically higher, pulse rate, respiratory rate, aspartate aminotransferase, lactate dehydrogenase, c-reactive protein, d-dimer, fibrinogen, activated partial thromboplastin time, troponin and procalcitonin compared to patients followed in clinics. Turkey has avoided the disease for some time but as inevitable as it is, our country has been added to the countries which are infected.

Key words: Diabetes mellitus; insulin resistance; oncostatin M; metabolic syndrome

Background: To investigate the relationship between anxiety and white coat hypertension (WCH) using the hospital anxiety and depression scale-anxiety (HADS-A) score. Methods: Participants lacking a pre-existing diagnosis of hypertension but displaying increased office blood pressure were included in this study. Subsequently, they were classified as either newly diagnosed sustained hypertension (SustHT) or white coat hypertension (WCH) patients, as determined by 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring measurements. The assessment of their anxiety levels was conducted using the HADS-A questionnaire. We performed regression, comparative, and sensitivity analyses to elucidate the association between anxiety and WCH. Results: In this cohort of 303 consecutive individuals (mean age 54 years, 46% female), 81 (26.7%) patients were diagnosed with WCH. Those with WCH were younger (49 vs. 56 years, P < .001), had higher heart rate (85 vs. 76 bpm, P < .001) and exhibited a female predominance (56% vs. 43%, P = .049) compared to individuals with SustHT. The HADS-A was higher in WCH than in SustHT (9.0 ± 2.9 vs. 6.6 ± 2.6, P < .001). Furthermore, HADS-A showed positive correlation with systolic and diastolic pressures measured in the out-patient clinic (r = 0.523 and r = 0.387, respectively; P < .001 for both). The full model with HADS-A had better discriminatory power (Harrell’s c-index 0.82 vs. 0.77, P = .0025), increased calibration, and a greater net benefit than the base model without. The ROC curve analysis, using a cut-off of >6 for HADS-A, demonstrated a sensitivity of 76.5% and specificity of 53.6% in detecting WCH (Area Under the Curve = 0.72, P < .001). Conclusions: Our study revealed that individuals with WCH, in comparison to those with SustHT, exhibit a higher level of anxiety as indicated by HADS-A.