Machine learning based classification methods are widely used in geoscience applications, including mineral prospectivity mapping. Typical characteristics of the data, such as small number of positive instances, imbalanced class distributions and lack of verified negative instances make ROC analysis and cross-validation natural choices for classifier evaluation. However, recent literature has identified two sources of bias, that can affect reliability of area under ROC curve estimation via cross-validation on spatial data. The pooling procedure performed by methods such as leave-one-out can introduce a substantial negative bias to results. At the same time, spatial dependencies leading to spatial autocorrelation can result in overoptimistic results, if not corrected for. In this work, we introduce the spatial leave-pair-out cross-validation method, that corrects for both of these biases simultaneously. The methodology is used to benchmark a number of classification methods on mineral prospectivity mapping data from the Central Lapland greenstone belt. The evaluation highlights the dangers of obtaining misleading results on spatial data and demonstrates how these problems can be avoided. Further, the results show the advantages of simple linear models for this classification task.

Laboratory-based hyperspectral imaging (HSI) is an optical non-destructive technology used to extract mineralogical information from bedrock drill cores. In the present study, drill core scanning in the long-wave infrared (LWIR; 8000–12,000 nm) wavelength region was used to map the dominant minerals in HSI pixels. Machine learning classification algorithms, including random forest (RF) and support vector machine, have previously been applied to the mineral characterization of drill core hyperspectral data. The objectives of this study are to expand semi-automated mineral mapping by investigating the mapping accuracy, generalization potential, and classification ability of cutting-edge methods, such as various ensemble machine learning algorithms and deep learning semantic segmentation. In the present study, the mapping of quartz, talc, chlorite, and mixtures thereof in HSI data was performed using the ENVINet5 algorithm, which is based on the U-net deep learning network and four decision tree ensemble algorithms, including RF, gradient-boosting decision tree (GBDT), light gradient-boosting machine (LightGBM), AdaBoost, and bagging. Prior to training the classification models, endmember selection was employed using the Sequential Maximum Angle Convex Cone endmember extraction method to prepare the samples used in the model training and evaluation of the classification results. The results show that the GBDT and LightGBM classifiers outperformed the other classification models with overall accuracies of 89.43% and 89.22%, respectively. The results of the other classifiers showed overall accuracies of 87.32%, 87.33%, 82.74%, and 78.32% for RF, bagging, ENVINet5, and AdaBoost, respectively. Therefore, the findings of this study confirm that the ensemble machine learning algorithms are efficient tools to analyze drill core HSI data and map dominant minerals. Moreover, the implementation of deep learning methods for mineral mapping from HSI drill core data should be further explored and adjusted.

The traditional study of palaeoseismic trenches, involving logging, stratigraphic and structural interpretation, can be time consuming and affected by biases and inaccuracies. To overcome these limitations, a new workflow is presented that integrates infrared hyperspectral and photogrammetric data to support field‐based palaeoseismic observations. As a case study, this method is applied on two palaeoseismic trenches excavated across a post‐glacial fault scarp in northern Finnish Lapland. The hyperspectral imagery (HSI) is geometrically and radiometrically corrected, processed using established image processing algorithms and machine learning approaches, and co‐registered to a structure‐from‐motion point cloud. HSI‐enhanced virtual outcrop models are a useful complement to palaeoseismic field studies as they not only provide an intuitive visualisation of the outcrop and a versatile data archive, but also enable an unbiased assessment of the mineralogical composition of lithologic units and a semi‐automatic delineation of contacts and deformational structures in a 3D virtual environment.