Susan Johnson

Dr. Susan Johnson

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

19Years (2008-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
3 September 2020 in Pediatric Obesity
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KBKatherine Balantekin
Katherine Balantekin
SAStephanie Anzman-Frasca
Stephanie Anzman-Frasca
LFLori A. Francis
Lori A. Francis
AVAlison K. Ventura
Alison K. Ventura
JFJennifer O. Fisher
Jennifer O. Fisher
SJSusan Johnson
Susan Johnson
Summary: Parents play a critical role in the development of children's eating behaviours and weight status, serving as providers, models and regulators of the food environment. Many research reviews have focused on the robust body of evidence on coercive control in feeding: how parenting practices such as restriction and pressure to eat increase children's risk for developing undesirable eating behaviours and unhealthy weight outcomes. Fewer reviews adopt a strengths‐based perspective focusing on the ways that parents can actively support the development of healthy eating behaviours and weight trajectories. Emerging research on such positive parenting styles and practices offers solutions beyond the avoidance of coercive control, as well as opportunities to highlight parallels between research on food parenting and the broader, well‐established developmental literature on positive parenting. The focus of this review is to summarize what is known regarding benefits of positive parenting styles and practices for child eating and weight outcomes and discuss recommendations for future research. Current evidence supports starting with responsive feeding and parenting during infancy and incorporating structure and limit setting in early childhood, with monitoring and mealtime structure remaining important during middle childhood and adolescence. Areas for future research include: (1) further examination of the implications of identified food parenting practices and styles among diverse groups and caregivers; (2) increased consideration of child factors (eg, temperament) as moderators or mediators; and (3) further clarification of the relationship between general parenting and food parenting.

1 January 2016 in Advances in Nutrition
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SJSusan Johnson
Susan Johnson
Food intake patterns begin to be shaped at the earliest points in life. Early exposures and experiences are critical for the acceptance of some foods

1 March 2011 in Obesity
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KBKyle S. Burger
Kyle S. Burger
JFJennifer O. Fisher
Jennifer O. Fisher
SJSusan Johnson
Susan Johnson

1 August 2016 in Physiology & Behavior
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MCMichelle I. Cardel
Michelle I. Cardel
SJSusan Johnson
Susan Johnson
JCJimikaye Courtney
Jimikaye Courtney
EDEmily Dhurandhar
Emily Dhurandhar
AKA.D. Keita
A.D. Keita
DAD.B. Allison
D.B. Allison

1 November 2015 in The Journal of Nutrition
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SJSusan Johnson
Susan Johnson
PDPatricia L Davies
Patricia L Davies
RBRichard E Boles
Richard E Boles
WGWilliam J Gavin
William J Gavin
LBLaura Bellows
Laura Bellows
Background: Food neophobia in children has been associated with poor dietary variety and nutrient intakes. Underlying characteristics that may predisp

25 September 2011 in International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KBKyle S. Burger
Kyle S. Burger
MCMarc A Cornier
Marc A Cornier
JIJan Ingebrigtsen
Jan Ingebrigtsen
SJSusan Johnson
Susan Johnson
Background: Visual presentation of food provides considerable information such as its potential for palatability and availability, both of which can impact eating behavior.Methods: We investigated the subjective ratings for food appeal and desire to eat when exposed to food pictures in a fed sample (n = 129) using the computer paradigm ImageRate. Food appeal and desire to eat were analyzed for the effects of food group, portion size and energy density of the foods presented as well as by participant characteristics.Results: Food appeal ratings were significantly higher than those for desire to eat (57.9 ± 11.6 v. 44.7 ± 18.0;p< 0.05). Body mass index was positively correlated to desire to eat (r= 0.20;p< 0.05), but not food appeal. Food category analyses revealed that fruit was the highest rated food category for both appeal and desire, followed by discretionary foods. Additionally, overweight individuals reported higher ratings of desire to eat large portions of food compared to smaller portions (p< 0.001), although these effects were relatively small. Energy density of the foods was inversely correlated with ratings for both appeal and desire (r's = - 0.27;p's < 0.01).Conclusions: Results support the hypothesis that individuals differentiate between food appeal and desire to eat foods when assessing these ratings using the same type of metric. Additionally, relations among food appeal and desire to eat ratings and body mass show overweight individuals could be more responsive to visual foods cues in a manner that contributes to obesity.