Shuming Liu

Shuming Liu

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

24Years (2003-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 December 2008 in Environmental Modelling & Software
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CMChristos Makropoulos
Christos Makropoulos
KNK. Natsis
K. Natsis
SLShuming Liu
Shuming Liu
KMK. Mittas
K. Mittas
David  ButlerDavid Butler
David Butler

10 February 2017 in Urban Water Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
YWYipeng Wu
Yipeng Wu
SLShuming Liu
Shuming Liu
This study focuses on data-driven approaches for burst detection and classifies them into three categories: classification method, prediction-classification method and statistical method. The performance of these methods is discussed. By analysing uncertainty in burst detection, this paper revealed that non-stationary monitoring data and limitations present in these methods challenge the reliability of detection results. Data pre-processing and probabilistic solutions to deal with the uncertainty are summarised. From these findings and discussions, this paper concludes and recommends that: a) data-driven approaches are promising in real-life burst detection and reducing false alarms is an important issue; b) more comprehensive performance evaluation might be necessary, in particular regarding detectable burst size; c) further research on new methods employing multivariate analysis and a new category based on clustering analysis would be beneficial to tackle uncertainty; d) more focus on the use of pressure data might facilitate burst location and reduce investment in burst detection.

1 December 2018 in Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GGGuancheng Guo
Guancheng Guo
SLShuming Liu
Shuming Liu
YWYipeng Wu
Yipeng Wu
JLJunyu Li
Junyu Li
RZRen Zhou
Ren Zhou
XZXiaoyun Zhu
Xiaoyun Zhu
Short-time water demand forecasting is essential for optimal control in a water distribution system (WDS). Current methods (e.g., time-series models and conventional artificial neural networks) have limited power in practice due to the nonlinear nature of changes in water demand. In particular, 15-min time-step forecasting may not be accurate when using conventional models. To tackle this problem, this paper investigates the potential of deep learning in short-term water demand forecasting, developing a gated recurrent unit network (GRUN) model to forecast water demand 15 min and 24 h into the future with a 15-min time step. The performance of GRUN was compared with a conventional artificial neural network (ANN) model and seasonal autoregressive integrated moving average (SARIMA) model. A correction module was used to reduce the cumulative error. The results show that the deep learning method improves the performance of water demand prediction. The correction module enhances the performance of ANN and GRUN models. In general, deep neural network models like GRUN outperform the ANN and SARIMA models for both 15-min and 24-h forecasts. These findings can provide more flexible and effective solutions for water demand forecasting.

1 November 2019 in Water Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
YZYanyang Zhang
Yanyang Zhang
XGXiang Gao
Xiang Gao
KSKate Smith
Kate Smith
GIGoulven Inial
Goulven Inial
SLShuming Liu
Shuming Liu
Bingcai PanBingcai Pan
Bingcai Pan

1 March 2008 in Chemosphere
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MPMarc Pidou
Marc Pidou
LALisa Avery
Lisa Avery
TSTom Stephenson
Tom Stephenson
PJPaul Jeffrey
Paul Jeffrey
SPSimon A. Parsons
Simon A. Parsons
JBJefferson Raja Bose
Jefferson Raja Bose

1 September 2016 in Water Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
YWYipeng Wu
Yipeng Wu
SLShuming Liu
Shuming Liu
XWXue Wu
Xue Wu
YLYoufei Liu
Youfei Liu
YGYisheng Guan
Yisheng Guan