Matteo Zanetti

Dr. Matteo Zanetti

University of Trento - Department of Industrial Engineering
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

11Years (2016-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
13 March 2019 in Entropy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Matteo ZanettiMatteo Zanetti
Matteo Zanetti
Luca FaesLuca Faes
Luca Faes
GNGiandomenico Nollo
Giandomenico Nollo
Mariolino  De Cecco Mariolino De Cecco
Mariolino De Cecco
Riccardo PerniceRiccardo Pernice
Riccardo Pernice
AFAlberto Fornaser
Alberto Fornaser
In this study, an analysis of brain, cardiovascular and respiratory dynamics was conducted combining information-theoretic measures with the Network Physiology paradigm during different levels of mental stress. Starting from low invasive recordings of electroencephalographic, electrocardiographic, respiratory, and blood volume pulse signals, the dynamical activity of seven physiological systems was probed with one-second time resolution measuring the time series of the δ , θ , α and β brain wave amplitudes, the cardiac period (RR interval), the respiratory amplitude, and the duration of blood pressure wave propagation (pulse arrival time, PAT). Synchronous 5-min windows of these time series, obtained from 18 subjects during resting wakefulness (REST), mental stress induced by mental arithmetic (MA) and sustained attention induced by serious game (SG), were taken to describe the dynamics of the nodes composing the observed physiological network. Network activity and connectivity were then assessed in the framework of information dynamics computing the new information generated by each node, the information dynamically stored in it, and the information transferred to it from the other network nodes. Moreover, the network topology was investigated using directed measures of conditional information transfer and assessing their statistical significance. We found that all network nodes dynamically produce and store significant amounts of information, with the new information being prevalent in the brain systems and the information storage being prevalent in the peripheral systems. The transition from REST to MA was associated with an increase of the new information produced by the respiratory signal time series (RESP), and that from MA to SG with a decrease of the new information produced by PAT. Each network node received a significant amount of information from the other nodes, with the highest amount transferred to RR and the lowest transferred to δ , θ , α and β . The topology of the physiological network underlying such information transfer was node- and state-dependent, with the peripheral subnetwork showing interactions from RR to PAT and between RESP and RR, PAT consistently across states, the brain subnetwork resulting more connected during MA, and the subnetwork of brain–peripheral interactions involving different brain rhythms in the three states and resulting primarily activated during MA. These results have both physiological relevance as regards the interpretation of central and autonomic effects on cardiovascular and respiratory variability, and practical relevance as regards the identification of features useful for the automatic distinction of different mental states.

4 February 2021 in Frontiers in Neuroscience
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RPRiccardo Pernice
Riccardo Pernice
YAYuri Antonacci
Yuri Antonacci
Matteo ZanettiMatteo Zanetti
Matteo Zanetti
ABAlessandro Busacca
Alessandro Busacca
DMDaniele Marinazzo
Daniele Marinazzo
GNGiandomenico Nollo
Giandomenico Nollo
In this work, we extend to the multivariate case the classical correlation analysis used in the field of network physiology to probe dynamic interactions between organ systems in the human body. To this end, we define different correlation-based measures of the multivariate interaction (MI) within and between the brain and body subnetworks of the human physiological network, represented, respectively, by the time series of δ, θ, α, and β electroencephalographic (EEG) wave amplitudes, and of heart rate, respiration amplitude, and pulse arrival time (PAT) variability (η, ρ, π). MI is computed: (i) considering all variables in the two subnetworks to evaluate overall brain–body interactions; (ii) focusing on a single target variable and dissecting its global interaction with all other variables into contributions arising from the same subnetwork and from the other subnetwork; and (iii) considering two variables conditioned to all the others to infer the network topology. The framework is applied to the time series measured from the EEG, electrocardiographic (ECG), respiration, and blood volume pulse (BVP) signals recorded synchronously via wearable sensors in a group of healthy subjects monitored at rest and during mental arithmetic and sustained attention tasks. We find that the human physiological network is highly connected, with predominance of the links internal of each subnetwork (mainly η−ρ and δ−θ, θ−α, α−β), but also statistically significant interactions between the two subnetworks (mainly η−β and η−δ). MI values are often spatially heterogeneous across the scalp and are modulated by the physiological state, as indicated by the decrease of cardiorespiratory interactions during sustained attention and by the increase of brain–heart interactions and of brain–brain interactions at the frontal scalp regions during mental arithmetic. These findings illustrate the complex and multi-faceted structure of interactions manifested within and between different physiological systems and subsystems across different levels of mental stress.

14 November 2019 in Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Matteo ZanettiMatteo Zanetti
Matteo Zanetti
TMTeruhiro Mizumoto
Teruhiro Mizumoto
LFLuca Faes
Luca Faes
AFAlberto Fornaser
Alberto Fornaser
MCMariolino De Cecco
Mariolino De Cecco
GNGiandomenico Nollo
Giandomenico Nollo

3 January 2023 in Sensors
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Simone PasinettiSimone Pasinetti
Simone Pasinetti
Cristina NuzziCristina Nuzzi
Cristina Nuzzi
Alessandro LuchettiAlessandro Luchetti
Alessandro Luchetti
Matteo ZanettiMatteo Zanetti
Matteo Zanetti
Matteo LANCINIMatteo LANCINI
Matteo LANCINI
Mariolino  De Cecco Mariolino De Cecco
Mariolino De Cecco
Time-of-flight cameras are widely adopted in a variety of indoor applications ranging from industrial object measurement to human activity recognition. However, the available products may differ in terms of the quality of the acquired point cloud, and the datasheet provided by the constructors may not be enough to guide researchers in the choice of the perfect device for their application. Hence, this work details the experimental procedure to assess time-of-flight cameras’ error sources that should be considered when designing an application involving time-of-flight technology, such as the bias correction and the temperature influence on the point cloud stability. This is the first step towards a standardization of the metrological characterization procedure that could ensure the robustness and comparability of the results among tests and different devices. The procedure was conducted on Kinect Azure, Basler Blaze 101, and Basler ToF 640 cameras. Moreover, we compared the devices in the task of 3D reconstruction following a procedure involving the measure of both an object and a human upper-body-shaped mannequin. The experiment highlighted that, despite the results of the previously conducted metrological characterization, some devices showed evident difficulties in reconstructing the target objects. Thus, we proved that performing a rigorous evaluation procedure similar to the one proposed in this paper is always necessary when choosing the right device.

1 December 2017 in Robotics and Autonomous Systems
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AFA. Fornaser
A. Fornaser
PTP. Tomasin
P. Tomasin
MCM. De Cecco
M. De Cecco
MTM. Tavernini
M. Tavernini
Matteo ZanettiMatteo Zanetti
Matteo Zanetti

3 February 2019
Verified
Book Chapter
Closed access
Matteo ZanettiMatteo Zanetti
Matteo Zanetti
Luca FaesLuca Faes
Luca Faes
MCMariolino De Cecco
Mariolino De Cecco
AFAlberto Fornaser
Alberto Fornaser
MVMartina Valente
Martina Valente
GNGiandomenico Nollo
Giandomenico Nollo