Andrew Lister

Dr. Andrew Lister


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

24Years (2003-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
19 December 2020 in Forests
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ALAndrew Lister
Andrew Lister
Hans AndersenHans Andersen
Hans Andersen
TFTracey Frescino
Tracey Frescino
DGDemetrios Gatziolis
Demetrios Gatziolis
Sean HealeySean Healey
Sean Healey
BWB. Tyler Wilson
B. Tyler Wilson
Globally, forests are a crucial natural resource, and their sound management is critical for human and ecosystem health and well-being. Efforts to manage forests depend upon reliable data on the status of and trends in forest resources. When these data come from well-designed natural resource monitoring (NRM) systems, decision makers can make science-informed decisions. National forest inventories (NFIs) are a cornerstone of NRM systems, but require capacity and skills to implement. Efficiencies can be gained by incorporating auxiliary information derived from remote sensing (RS) into ground-based forest inventories. However, it can be difficult for countries embarking on NFI development to choose among the various RS integration options, and to develop a harmonized vision of how NFI and RS data can work together to meet monitoring needs. The NFI of the United States, which has been conducted by the USDA Forest Service’s (USFS) Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) program for nearly a century, uses RS technology extensively. Here we review the history of the use of RS in FIA, beginning with general background on NFI, FIA, and sampling statistics, followed by a description of the evolution of RS technology usage, beginning with paper aerial photography and ending with present day applications and future directions. The goal of this review is to offer FIA’s experience with NFI-RS integration as a case study for other countries wishing to improve the efficiency of their NFI programs.

8 November 2011 in Carbon Balance and Management
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MKMichael Köhl
Michael Köhl
ALAndrew Lister
Andrew Lister
CSCharles T Scott
Charles T Scott
TBThomas Baldauf
Thomas Baldauf
DPDaniel Plugge
Daniel Plugge
Countries willing to adopt a REDD regime need to establish a national Measurement, Reporting and Verification (MRV) system that provides information on forest carbon stocks and carbon stock changes. Due to the extensive areas covered by forests the information is generally obtained by sample based surveys. Most operational sampling approaches utilize a combination of earth-observation data and in-situ field assessments as data sources.

12 February 2008 in Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ALAndrew Lister
Andrew Lister
CSCharles T. Scott
Charles T. Scott

31 October 2012 in Carbon Balance and Management
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Sean HealeySean Healey
Sean Healey
PPPaul Patterson
Paul Patterson
Sassan SaatchiSassan Saatchi
Sassan Saatchi
MLMichael A Lefsky
Michael A Lefsky
ALAndrew Lister
Andrew Lister
EFElizabeth A Freeman
Elizabeth A Freeman
Lidar height data collected by the Geosciences Laser Altimeter System (GLAS) from 2002 to 2008 has the potential to form the basis of a globally consistent sample-based inventory of forest biomass. GLAS lidar return data were collected globally in spatially discrete full waveform “shots,” which have been shown to be strongly correlated with aboveground forest biomass. Relationships observed at spatially coincident field plots may be used to model biomass at all GLAS shots, and well-established methods of model-based inference may then be used to estimate biomass and variance for specific spatial domains. However, the spatial pattern of GLAS acquisition is neither random across the surface of the earth nor is it identifiable with any particular systematic design. Undefined sample properties therefore hinder the use of GLAS in global forest sampling.

1 January 2005
Verified
Report
Closed access
PDF file
WMWilliam H. McWilliams
William H. McWilliams
BBBrett J. Butler
Brett J. Butler
LCLaurence E. Caldwell
Laurence E. Caldwell
DGDouglas M. Griffith
Douglas M. Griffith
MHMichael L. Hoppus
Michael L. Hoppus
CWChristopher W. Woodall
Christopher W. Woodall

1 April 2021 in Environmental Research Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Lei MaLei Ma
Lei Ma
GHGeorge Hurtt
George Hurtt
HTHao Tang
Hao Tang
RLRachel L Lamb
Rachel L Lamb
ECElliott Campbell
Elliott Campbell
CSCarlos E Silva
Carlos E Silva
The inclusion of forest carbon in climate change mitigation planning requires the development of models able to project potential future carbon stocks—a step beyond traditional monitoring, reporting and verification frameworks. Here, we updated and expanded a high-resolution forest carbon modelling approach previously developed for the state of Maryland to 11 states in the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI) domain, which includes Connecticut, Delaware, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, and Vermont. In this study, we employ an updated version of the Ecosystem Demography (ED) model, an improved lidar initialization strategy, and an expanded calibration/validation approach. High resolution (90 m) wall-to-wall maps of present aboveground carbon, aboveground carbon sequestration potential, aboveground carbon sequestration potential gap (CSPG), and time to reach sequestration potential were produced over the RGGI domain where airborne lidar data were available, including 100% of eight states, 62% of Maine, 12% of New Jersey, and 0.65% of New York. For the eight states with complete data, an area of 228 552 km2, the contemporary forest aboveground carbon stock is estimated to be 1134 Tg C, and the forest aboveground CSPG is estimated to be larger at >1770 Tg C. Importantly, these estimates of the potential for added aboveground carbon sequestration in forests are spatially resolved, are further partitioned between continued growth of existing trees and new afforested/reforested areas, and include time estimates for realization. They are also assessed for sensitivity to potential changes in vegetation productivity and disturbance rate in response to climate change. The results from this study are intended as input into regional, state, and local planning efforts that consider future climate mitigation in forests along with other land-use considerations.