Rajib Sinha

Dr. Rajib Sinha

KTH Royal Institute of Technology
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

18Years (2009-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
17 June 2014 in Waste Management & Research: The Journal for a Sustainable Circular Economy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JSJagdeep Singh
Jagdeep Singh
Rafael LaurentiRafael Laurenti
Rafael Laurenti
Rajib SinhaRajib Sinha
Rajib Sinha
BFBjörn Frostell
Björn Frostell
Rapid economic growth, urbanization and increasing population have caused (materially intensive) resource consumption to increase, and consequently the release of large amounts of waste to the environment. From a global perspective, current waste and resource management lacks a holistic approach covering the whole chain of product design, raw material extraction, production, consumption, recycling and waste management. In this article, progress and different sustainability challenges facing the global waste management system are presented and discussed. The study leads to the conclusion that the current, rather isolated efforts, in different systems for waste management, waste reduction and resource management are indeed not sufficient in a long term sustainability perspective. In the future, to manage resources and wastes sustainably, waste management requires a more systems-oriented approach that addresses the root causes for the problems. A specific issue to address is the development of improved feedback information (statistics) on how waste generation is linked to consumption.

1 December 2015 in Habitat International
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GZGuanghong Zhou
Guanghong Zhou
JSJagdeep Singh
Jagdeep Singh
JWJiechen Wu
Jiechen Wu
Rajib SinhaRajib Sinha
Rajib Sinha
Rafael LaurentiRafael Laurenti
Rafael Laurenti
BFBjörn Frostell
Björn Frostell

1 August 2016 in Building and Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Rajib SinhaRajib Sinha
Rajib Sinha
MLMaria Lennartsson
Maria Lennartsson
BFBjörn Frostell
Björn Frostell

19 February 2015 in Systems Research and Behavioral Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Rafael LaurentiRafael Laurenti
Rafael Laurenti
JSJagdeep Singh
Jagdeep Singh
Rajib SinhaRajib Sinha
Rajib Sinha
JPJosepha Potting
Josepha Potting
BFBjörn Frostell
Björn Frostell

17 July 2021 in Journal of Industrial Ecology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JTJean‐Baptiste E. Thomas
Jean‐Baptiste E. Thomas
Rajib SinhaRajib Sinha
Rajib Sinha
ÅSÅsa Strand
Åsa Strand
TSTore Söderqvist
Tore Söderqvist
JSJohanna Stadmark
Johanna Stadmark
LHLinus Hasselström
Linus Hasselström
A blue‐green bioeconomy revolution is underway in Europe, with particular attention being paid to the development of new or underutilized marine biomass resources. The wild harvest and mariculture of low‐trophic non‐fed species of marine biomass may be contributing to circular economies, the mitigation of environmental problems such as eutrophication and climate change through the uptake of nutrients and carbon, while also recovering finite phosphorus from marine coastal environments, thus contributing to food security. The present study provides a cradle‐to‐gate life cycle perspective on seven established or innovative/emerging marine biomass utilization cases in Sweden: mariculture of sugar kelp, blue mussels, and ascidians and the harvest of invasive Pacific oysters along the Skagerrak coast, the mariculture of blue mussels in the Baltic sea, the harvest of common reed in the Stockholm archipelago, and the harvest of beach‐cast seaweed in Gotland. Results showed that the mariculture cases were found to contribute to eutrophication and climate impact mitigation (at gate). All cases were found to contribute to closing the loop on phosphorus by enabling recovery from marine or coastal environments, bridging marine–land flows, all while performing well from an environmental perspective with a relatively low cumulative energy demand and low carbon and nutrient footprints. This highlights the potential of low‐trophic biomass to contribute to phosphorus security in the future, and demonstrates the value of industrial ecology tools such as LCA in support of this imminent Decade of Ocean Science for Sustainable Development.

17 November 2021 in Buildings
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SWShaozhe Wang
Shaozhe Wang
Rajib SinhaRajib Sinha
Rajib Sinha
In recent years, Sweden has promoted prefabricated buildings supporting the increasing of prefabricated rates in buildings with precast components, in order to reduce the environmental problems caused by the construction sector. This study, focusing on the construction activities, examines how the increasing prefabricated rate could influence the environmental impacts of the construction sector. This study conducts a cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment (LCA) of a reference building with a prefabricated rate of 26% in the Stockholm Royal Seaport, and compares nine scenarios with prefabricated rates, ranging from 6% to 96%. The results indicate the water footprint decreases, but the total energy footprint and carbon footprint increase as the prefabricated rate increases. Among other impacts, terrestrial ecotoxicity shows the biggest increase with an increase of the prefabricated rate. This study reveals that material extraction is the largest influencing factor, causing a water footprint when the prefabricated rate increases. The impact changes in the energy footprint, carbon footprint, and terrestrial ecotoxicity, and are primarily determined by transport and are sensitive to transport distance and vehicle types.