Mark Winterbottom

Dr. Mark Winterbottom

Faculty of Education, University of Cambridge, England CB2 8PQ, United Kingdom
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

28Years (1999-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 March 2009 in Journal of Environmental Psychology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MWMark Winterbottom
Mark Winterbottom
AWArnold J Wilkins
Arnold J Wilkins

1 January 2007 in Computers & Education
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SHSara Hennessy
Sara Hennessy
JWJocelyn Wishart
Jocelyn Wishart
Denise WhitelockDenise Whitelock
Denise Whitelock
RDRosemary Deaney
Rosemary Deaney
RBRichard Brawn
Richard Brawn
MWMark Winterbottom
Mark Winterbottom

1 March 2020 in Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
LMLuke McGuire
Luke McGuire
KMKelly Lynn Mulvey
Kelly Lynn Mulvey
EGEric Goff
Eric Goff
MIMatthew J. Irvin
Matthew J. Irvin
MWMark Winterbottom
Mark Winterbottom
ARAdam Rutland
Adam Rutland
Stereotypes about science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) are associated with reduced STEM engagement amongst girls and women. The present study examined these stereotypes from early childhood through adolescence within informal science learning sites (ISLS; science museums, zoos, aquariums). Further, the study explored whether interactions with male or female educators influenced STEM stereotypes. Participants (n = 997, female = 572) were ISLS visitors in the UK and USA who either interacted with an educator, or no educator. With age participants were more likely to report that “both boys and girls” are “usually”, “should” be, and “can” be good at STEM. Independent of age, male participants reported that their own gender group “should” be good at STEM. Educator interactions did not influence stereotype responses. These results highlight early childhood as a key developmental window in which to challenge ideas about who can and should be proficient in STEM.

8 August 2007 in Learning, Media and Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SHSara Hennessy
Sara Hennessy
RDRosemary Deaney
Rosemary Deaney
KRKenneth Ruthven
Kenneth Ruthven
MWMark Winterbottom
Mark Winterbottom

11 September 2009 in Educational Studies
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HDHelen Demetriou
Helen Demetriou
EWElaine Wilson
Elaine Wilson
MWMark Winterbottom
Mark Winterbottom
Emotions play a crucial role in communication and engagement between people. This paper focuses on the extent to which new teachers consider and value the emotional component of teaching for the engagement and motivation of their students and themselves. Moreover, drawing on the literature on gender and emotion, which consistently cites females of all ages as having a greater capacity to empathise, we looked to see if female teachers are better equipped at engaging their students and whether there are differences in the emotional teaching styles of male and female newly qualified teachers. Both quantitative and qualitative approaches were employed. Analysis of questionnaires revealed significant gender difference in approaches to teaching and perceptions of it, and led us to pursue this issue further by interviewing a selection of the teachers. Teachers’ comments reflected differences between men and women in the ways they visualise the role of emotion in teaching. When faced with challenges and adversities in the classroom, such as disruptive and disengaged students, they employ different strategies to combat them, and typically, female teachers would go to greater lengths, often employing emotion tactics to re‐engage students. The research highlights the importance of focusing on emotional engagement in teaching, the consequences for teacher retention and implications for teacher training.

6 September 2010 in Educational Studies
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JGJonathan Galbraith
Jonathan Galbraith
MWMark Winterbottom
Mark Winterbottom
Drawing on role theory and socio‐constructivist ideas about learning, this study explores how peer‐tutoring can support tutors’ learning. The sample comprised ten 16–17‐year‐old biology tutors, working with twenty‐one 14–15‐year‐old students from a science class over eight weeks. Data were collected through an online wiki, tutor interviews, paired tutor discussions and video recordings. Tutors’ perceptions of their role motivated them to learn the material, and their learning was supported by discussion and explanation, revisiting fundamentals, making links between conceptual areas, testing and clarifying their understanding, and reorganising and building ideas, rehearsing them, and working through them repeatedly, to secure their understanding. When tutors employed long answer questions, there was evidence of reflection on their learning and links made between conceptual areas. When preparing to tutor, tutors could focus on key points and engage with basic ideas from alternative perspectives. Mental rehearsal of peer‐tutoring episodes helped them appreciate weaknesses in their own subject knowledge.