Marcin Zieliński

Prof. Marcin Zieliński

University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Department of Environmental Engineering
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

23Years (2004-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 November 2013 in Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Marcin DębowskiMarcin Dębowski
Marcin Dębowski
Marcin ZielińskiMarcin Zieliński
Marcin Zieliński
AGAnna Grala
Anna Grala
MDMagda Dudek
Magda Dudek

1 July 2008 in Bioresource Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Wojciech JanczukowiczWojciech Janczukowicz
Wojciech Janczukowicz
Marcin ZielińskiMarcin Zieliński
Marcin Zieliński
Marcin DębowskiMarcin Dębowski
Marcin Dębowski

29 November 2020 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Marcin DębowskiMarcin Dębowski
Marcin Dębowski
Marcin ZielińskiMarcin Zieliński
Marcin Zieliński
Joanna KazimierowiczJoanna Kazimierowicz
Joanna Kazimierowicz
NKNatalia Kujawska
Natalia Kujawska
STSzymon Talbierz
Szymon Talbierz
Microalgal biomass is currently considered as a sustainable and renewable feedstock for biofuel production (biohydrogen, biomethane, biodiesel) characterized by lower emissions of hazardous air pollutants than fossil fuels. Photobioreactors for microalgae growth can be exploited using many industrial and domestic wastes. It allows locating the commercial microalgal systems in areas that cannot be employed for agricultural purposes, i.e., near heating or wastewater treatment plants and other industrial facilities producing carbon dioxide and organic and nutrient compounds. Despite their high potential, the large-scale algal biomass production technologies are not popular because the systems for biomass production, separation, drainage, and conversion into energy carriers are difficult to explicitly assess and balance, considering the ecological and economical concerns. Most of the studies presented in the literature have been carried out on a small, laboratory scale. This significantly limits the possibility of obtaining reliable data for a comprehensive assessment of the efficiency of such solutions. Therefore, there is a need to verify the results in pilot-scale and the full technical-scale studies. This study summarizes the strengths and weaknesses of microalgal biomass production technologies for bioenergetic applications.

21 December 2022 in Energies
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Marcin ZielińskiMarcin Zieliński
Marcin Zieliński
Joanna KazimierowiczJoanna Kazimierowicz
Joanna Kazimierowicz
Marcin DębowskiMarcin Dębowski
Marcin Dębowski
Anaerobic wastewater treatment is still a dynamically developing technology ensuring the effective degradation of organic compounds and biogas production. As evidenced in the large scale-up, this technological solution surpasses aerobic methods in many aspects. Its advantages stem from the feasibility of operation at a high organic load rate, the smaller production of difficult-to-manage sewage sludge, the smaller space and cubature required, and the high-methane biogas ultimately produced. The exploitation of anaerobic reactors is in line with the assumption of a circular economy, material recycling by reduced CO2 emissions and energy consumption, and the production of renewable energy. Despite their unquestionable advantages, there is still a need to seek novel approaches and improve the currently exploited installations. The key avenues of research entail improvements in the stability of bioreactor operations and the enhancement of bioreactor adaptability to changing and unfavorable process parameters. The versatility of such systems would also be greatly improved by increasing nitrogen and phosphorus removal rates. Attempts have been made to achieve these goals by setting up separate zones within bioreactors for the individual steps of methane fermentation, incorporating active fillings to promote nutrient removal, and introducing chemical and physical treatments. An interesting solution is also the use of microwave radiation to stimulate temperature conditions and induce non-thermal phenomena, such as enhancing the enzymatic activity of methanogenic microflora. Another prospective approach is to integrate digesters into microalgal biomass production systems. The aim of this review paper is to present the thus-far technological knowledge about anaerobic wastewater treatment, including standard solutions and innovative ones, the effectiveness of which has been corroborated in pilot-scale installations.

12 October 2020 in BioEnergy Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MRMagdalena Rokicka
Magdalena Rokicka
Marcin ZielińskiMarcin Zieliński
Marcin Zieliński
MDMagda Dudek
Magda Dudek
Marcin DębowskiMarcin Dębowski
Marcin Dębowski
The extraction of lipids from microalgae cells of Botryococcus braunii and Chlorella vulgaris after ultrasonic and microwave pretreatment was evaluated. Cell disruption increased the lipid extraction efficiency, and microwave pretreatment was more effective compared with ultrasonic pretreatment. The maximum lipid yield from B. braunii was 56.42% using microwave radiation and 39.61% for ultrasonication, while from C. vulgaris, it was respectively 41.31% and 35.28%. The fatty acid composition in the lipid extracts was also analyzed. The methane yield from the residual extracted biomass pretreated by microwaves ranged from 148 to 185 NmL CH4/g VS for C. vulgaris and from 128 to 142 NmL CH4/g VS for B. braunii. In the case of ultrasonic pretreatment, the methane production was between 168 and 208 NmL CH4/g VS for C. vulgaris, while for B. braunii ranging from 150 to 174 NmL CH4/g VS. Anaerobic digestion showed that lipid-extracted biomass presented lower methane yield than non-lipid-extracted feedstock, and higher amount of lipid obtained in the extraction contributed less methane production. Anyway, anaerobic digestion of the residual extracted biomass can be a suitable method to increase economic viability of energy recovery from microalgae.

1 March 2021 in Bioresource Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Marcin ZielińskiMarcin Zieliński
Marcin Zieliński
MZMagdalena Zielińska
Magdalena Zielińska
Agnieszka Cydzik-KwiatkowskaAgnieszka Cydzik-Kwiatkowska
Agnieszka Cydzik-Kwiatkowska
PRPaulina Rusanowska
Paulina Rusanowska
Marcin DębowskiMarcin Dębowski
Marcin Dębowski