Magnus Stougaard

Dr. Magnus Stougaard


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

20Years (2007-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
29 October 2013 in ACS Nano
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SJSissel Juul
Sissel Juul
Federico IacovelliFederico Iacovelli
Federico Iacovelli
Mattia FalconiMattia Falconi
Mattia Falconi
SKSofie L. Kragh
Sofie L. Kragh
BCBrian Christensen
Brian Christensen
BKBirgitta Knudsen
Birgitta Knudsen

2 November 2012 in ACS Nano
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SJSissel Juul
Sissel Juul
CNChristine J. F. Nielsen
Christine J. F. Nielsen
RLRodrigo Labouriau
Rodrigo Labouriau
ARAmit Roy
Amit Roy
CTCinzia Tesauro
Cinzia Tesauro
BKBirgitta Knudsen
Birgitta Knudsen

29 November 2019 in BMC Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CTCinzia Tesauro
Cinzia Tesauro
ASAnne Katrine Simonsen
Anne Katrine Simonsen
MAMarie Bech Andersen
Marie Bech Andersen
KPKamilla Wandsoe Petersen
Kamilla Wandsoe Petersen
EKEmil Laust Kristoffersen
Emil Laust Kristoffersen
IGIrina Gromova
Irina Gromova
Background: Camptothecin (CPT) and its derivatives are currently used as second- or third-line treatment for patients with endocrine-resistant breast cancer (BC). These drugs convert nuclear enzyme DNA topoisomerase I (TOP1) to a cell poison with the potential to damage DNA by increasing the half-life of TOP1-DNA cleavage complexes (TOP1cc), ultimately resulting in cell death. In small and non-randomized trials for BC, researchers have observed extensive variation in CPT response rates, ranging from 14 to 64%. This variability may be due to the absence of reliable selective parameters for patient stratification. BC cell lines may serve as feasible models for generation of functional criteria that may be used to predict drug sensitivity for patient stratification and, thus, lead to more appropriate applications of CPT in clinical trials. However, no study published to date has included a comparison of multiple relevant parameters and CPT response across cell lines corresponding to specific BC subtypes.Method: We evaluated the levels and possible associations of seven parameters including the status of theTOP1gene (i.e. amplification), TOP1 protein expression level, TOP1 activity and CPT susceptibility, activity of the tyrosyl-DNA phosphodiesterase 1 (TDP1), the cellular CPT response and the cellular growth rate across a representative panel of BC cell lines, which exemplifies three major BC subtypes: Luminal, HER2 and TNBC.Results: In all BC cell lines analyzed (without regard to subtype classification), we observed a significant overall correlation between growth rate and CPT response. In cell lines derived from Luminal and HER2 subtypes, we observed a correlation betweenTOP1gene copy number, TOP1 activity, and CPT response, although the data were too limited for statistical analyses. In cell lines representing Luminal and TNBC subtypes, we observed a direct correlation between TOP1 protein abundancy and levels of enzymatic activity. In all three subtypes (Luminal, HER2, and TNBC), TOP1 exhibits approximately the same susceptibility to CPT. Of the three subtypes examined, the TNBC-like cell lines exhibited the highest CPT sensitivity and were characterized by the fastest growth rate. This indicates that breast tumors belonging to the TNBC subtype, may benefit from treatment with CPT derivatives.Conclusion: TOP1 activity is not a marker for CPT sensitivity in breast cancer.

19 December 2008 in ACS Nano
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MSMagnus Stougaard
Magnus Stougaard
JLJakob S. Lohmann
Jakob S. Lohmann
AMAngelo Mancino
Angelo Mancino
SCSüleyman Celik
Süleyman Celik
FAFelicie F. Andersen
Felicie F. Andersen
BKBirgitta Knudsen
Birgitta Knudsen

1 February 2016 in Journal of Controlled Release
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DVDorthe Viuff
Dorthe Viuff
FAFilipa Antunes
Filipa Antunes
LELeslie Evans
Leslie Evans
JCJason Cameron
Jason Cameron
HDHans Dyrnesli
Hans Dyrnesli
KHKenneth A. Howard
Kenneth A. Howard

22 January 2016 in BMC Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HJHaatisha Jandu
Haatisha Jandu
KAKristina Aluzaite
Kristina Aluzaite
LFLouise Fogh
Louise Fogh
STSebastian Wingaard Thrane
Sebastian Wingaard Thrane
JNJulie B. Noer
Julie B. Noer
Jan StenvangJan Stenvang
Jan Stenvang
Studies in taxane and/or anthracycline refractory metastatic breast cancer (mBC) patients have shown approximately 30 % response rates to irinotecan. Hence, a significant number of patients will experience irinotecan-induced side effects without obtaining any benefit. The aim of this study was to lay the groundwork for development of predictive biomarkers for irinotecan treatment in BC. We established BC cell lines with acquired or de novo resistance to SN-38, by exposing the human BC cell lines MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 to either stepwise increasing concentrations over 6 months or an initial high dose of SN-38 (the active metabolite of irinotecan), respectively. The resistant cell lines were analyzed for cross-resistance to other anti-cancer drugs, global gene expression, growth rates, TOP1 and TOP2A gene copy numbers and protein expression, and inhibition of the breast cancer resistance protein (ABCG2/BCRP) drug efflux pump. We found that the resistant cell lines showed 7–100 fold increased resistance to SN-38 but remained sensitive to docetaxel and the non-camptothecin Top1 inhibitor LMP400. The resistant cell lines were characterized by Top1 down-regulation, changed isoelectric points of Top1 and reduced growth rates. The gene and protein expression of ABCG2/BCRP was up-regulated in the resistant sub-lines and functional assays revealed BCRP as a key mediator of SN-38 resistance. Based on our preclinical results, we suggest analyzing the predictive value of the BCRP in breast cancer patients scheduled for irinotecan treatment. Moreover, LMP400 should be tested in a clinical setting in breast cancer patients with resistance to irinotecan.