Ding Jun

Dr. Ding Jun


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
2 January 2023 in Journal of Computational Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DJDing Jun
Ding Jun
YZYinxuan Zhou
Yinxuan Zhou
XHXia Huang
Xia Huang
KSKun Song
Kun Song
SLShiqing Lu
Shiqing Lu
LWLusheng Wang
Lusheng Wang

11 February 2026 in IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
XHXia Huang
Xia Huang
HXHaomin Xiang
Haomin Xiang
CWChang Wu
Chang Wu
JXJiabin Xu
Jiabin Xu
DJDing Jun
Ding Jun
YFYuki Funabora
Yuki Funabora
Dielectric elastomer actuators (DEA) have emerged as promising candidates for underwater exploration due to their high energy density and flexibility. However, the accumulation of residual charges compromises actuation efficiency, and conventional single-mode discharge strategies struggle to balance dynamic responsiveness with locomotion stability. Therefore, we present CRAB-EDM, a multi-modal underwater soft robot inspired by crab locomotion and powered by temporally modulated electro-discharge control. By integrating the distributed coordination mechanism of crab-like multi-foot motion with the electromechanical coupling behavior of DEA, we design a six-foot soft robotic architecture coupled with a tri-modal control framework: high-frequency fast discharge enhances dynamic actuation response, medium-frequency delayed discharge improves displacement-frequency synergy, and low-frequency coordinated discharge reinforces gait stability. Through ballast–limb coordination mechanism with a multi-modal control strategy, the nine-gram robot demonstrates versatile behaviors such as turning, jumping, and overing obstacle. Experimental results validate that the synergy between bio-inspired morphology and residual charge modulation significantly improves locomotion efficiency and terrain adaptability, offering a low-noise, highly adaptable solution for constrained underwater exploration.

15 December 2020 in Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DJDing Jun
Ding Jun
SZSheng-Lai Zhang
Sheng-Lai Zhang
QTQuan Tong
Quan Tong
LWLu-Sheng Wang
Lu-Sheng Wang
XHXia Huang
Xia Huang
SLShiqing Lu
Shiqing Lu
The effects of grain boundary misorientation angle (θ) on mechanical properties and the mechanism of plastic deformation of the Ni/Ni3Al interface under tensile loading were investigated using molecular dynamics simulations. The results show that the space lattice arrangement at the interface is dependent on grain boundary misorientations, while the interfacial energy is dependent on the arrangement. The interfacial energy varies in a W pattern as the grain boundary misorientation increases from 0° to 90°. Specifically, the interfacial energy first decreases and then increases in both segments of 0–60° and 60–90°. The yield strength, elastic modulus, and mean flow stress decrease as the interfacial energy increases. The mechanism of plastic deformation varies as the grain boundary misorientation angle (θ) increases from 0° to 90°. When θ = 0°, the microscopic plastic deformation mechanisms of the Ni and Ni3Al layers are both dominated by stacking faults induced by Shockley dislocations. When θ = 30°, 60°, and 80°, the mechanisms of plastic deformation of the Ni and Ni3Al layers are the decomposition of stacking faults into twin grain boundaries caused by extended dislocations and the proliferation of stacking faults, respectively. When θ = 90°, the mechanisms of plastic deformation of both the Ni and Ni3Al layers are dominated by twinning area growth resulting from extended dislocations.

1 July 2022 in Computational Materials Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
XYXin Yang
Xin Yang
XZXiangguo Zeng
Xiangguo Zeng
FWFang Wang
Fang Wang
DJDing Jun
Ding Jun
HZHan Zhao
Han Zhao
BXBing Xue
Bing Xue

1 January 2017 in Journal of Nanomaterials
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DJDing Jun
Ding Jun
LWLu-Sheng Wang
Lu-Sheng Wang
KSKun Song
Kun Song
BLBo Liu
Bo Liu
XHXia Huang
Xia Huang
The crack propagation process in single-crystal aluminum plate (SCAP) with central cracks under tensile load was simulated by molecular dynamics method. Further, the effects of model size, crack length, temperature, and strain rate on strength of SCAP and crack growth were comprehensively investigated. The results showed that, with the increase of the model size, crack length, and strain rate, the plastic yield point of SCAP occurred in advance, the limit stress of plastic yield decreased, and the plastic deformability of material increased, but the temperature had less effect and sensitivity on the strength and crack propagation of SCAP. The model size affected the plastic deformation and crack growth of the material. Specifically, at small scale, the plastic deformation and crack propagation in SCAP are mainly affected through dislocation multiplication and slip. However, the plastic deformation and crack propagation are obviously affected by dislocation multiplication and twinning in larger scale.

10 June 2021 in Crystals
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YWYuntian Wang
Yuntian Wang
XZXiangguo Zeng
Xiangguo Zeng
HCHuayan Chen
Huayan Chen
XYXin Yang
Xin Yang
FWFang Wang
Fang Wang
DJDing Jun
Ding Jun
The objective of this study was to develop a micromechanical approach for determining the Mie–Grüneisen EOS parameters of iron under the Hugoniot states. The multiscale shock technique (MSST) coupled with molecular dynamics (MD) simulations was employed to describe the shocked Hugoniot relation of single-crystal (SC) and nanocrystalline (NC) iron under high pressures. The Mie–Grüneisen equation of state (EOS) parameters, the cold pressure (Pc), the cold energy (Ec), the Grüneisen coefficient (γ), and the melting temperature (Tm) are discussed. The error between SC and NC iron results was found to be less than 1.5%. Interestingly, the differences in Hugoniot state (PH) and the internal energy between SC and NC iron were insignificant, which shows that the effect of grain size (GS) under high pressures was not significant. The Pc and Ec of SC and NC iron calculated based on the Morse potential were almost the same with those calculated based on the Born–Mayer potential; however, those calculated based on the Born–Mayer potential were a little larger at high pressures. In addition, several empirical and theoretical models were compared for the calculation of γ and Tm. The Mie–Grüneisen EOSs were shown on the 3D contour space; the pressure obtained with the Hugoniot curves as the reference was larger than that obtained with the cold curves as the reference.