Marcelo Mignoni

Dr. Marcelo Mignoni

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

20Years (2007-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 September 2008 in Applied Clay Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MMMarcelo Mignoni
Marcelo Mignoni

1 February 2010 in Applied Catalysis A: General
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MMMarcelo Mignoni
Marcelo Mignoni
MSMICHELE DE SOUZA
MICHELE DE SOUZA
Sibele PergherSibele Pergher
Sibele Pergher
RSRoberto F. de Souza
Roberto F. de Souza
Katia Bernardo-GusmãoKatia Bernardo-Gusmão
Katia Bernardo-Gusmão

1 March 2017 in Microporous and Mesoporous Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DPDiego Ivan Petkowicz
Diego Ivan Petkowicz
SCSabrine Canal
Sabrine Canal
PFPedro Henrick Finger
Pedro Henrick Finger
MMMarcelo Mignoni
Marcelo Mignoni
JSJoão Henrique Z. dos Santos
João Henrique Z. dos Santos

27 November 2018 in ACS Omega
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
APAriana S. Popiolski
Ariana S. Popiolski
RDRogério Marcos Dallago
Rogério Marcos Dallago
JSJuliana Steffens
Juliana Steffens
MMMarcelo Mignoni
Marcelo Mignoni
LVLuciana D. Venquiaruto
Luciana D. Venquiaruto
FDFábio Andrei Duarte
Fábio Andrei Duarte
In this work, the use of ultrasound energy for chromium removal from residual tannery leather was investigated. The following parameters were evaluated: complexation temperature (60–90 °C), chromium/complexant molar ratio (1:0 to 1:6), complexation time (30–120 min), washing steps (1–14), washing temperature (25–80 °C), and washing time (1–10 min). For all evaluated conditions, chromium removal was monitored by flame atomic absorption spectrometry. The residual tannery leather after different extraction strategies were characterized using a scanning electron microscopy. For the proposed method, the optimized conditions were: 3 g of residual tannery leather to be treated, 100 mL of extraction solution (chromium/complexant molar ratio of 1:3), at 80 °C and 30 min of sonication. To complete the chromium removal, only five washing cycles (50 mL of water at 50 °C) of 3 min were required. Using these conditions, a chromium removal higher than 98% was achieved. Under the same reaction conditions, the results were compared with mechanical stirring (100 rpm), which allowed observing the significant effects of ultrasound for chromium removal. Comparing to the conventional method, the total time of the process (including extraction and washing steps) was decreased from 150 to 45 min and the water volume for the washing was reduced from 450 to 250 mL. Therefore, the proposed ultrasound-assisted process can be considered as a suitable alternative for chromium removal from residual tannery leather.

1 September 2015 in Microporous and Mesoporous Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CLChristian Wittee Lopes
Christian Wittee Lopes
PFPedro Henrick Finger
Pedro Henrick Finger
MMMarcelo Mignoni
Marcelo Mignoni
DEDaniel J. Emmerich
Daniel J. Emmerich
FMFabiana Magalhães Teixeira Mendes
Fabiana Magalhães Teixeira Mendes
Sibele PergherSibele Pergher
Sibele Pergher

8 March 2021 in Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AFAline Matuella Moreira Ficanha
Aline Matuella Moreira Ficanha
COCarolina Elisa Demaman Oro
Carolina Elisa Demaman Oro
EFElton Franceschi
Elton Franceschi
RDRogério Marcos Dallago
Rogério Marcos Dallago
MMMarcelo Mignoni
Marcelo Mignoni