Addressing the hypothesis that anaesthetic-analgesic technique during cancer surgery might influence recurrence or metastatic spread is a research priority. Propofol, which has anti-inflammatory properties in vitro, is clinically associated with reduced risk of cancer recurrence compared with sevoflurane anaesthesia in retrospective studies. Amide local anaesthetics, such as lidocaine, have cancer inhibiting effects in vitro. Steroids have anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive effects and are associated with improved recovery after major non-cancer surgery. We compared the effects of propofol, lidocaine and methylprednisolone on postoperative metastasis in a murine model of breast cancer surgery under sevoflurane anaesthesia. 4T1 tumour cells were introduced into the mammary fat-pad of female BALB/c mice and the resulting tumour resected seven days later under general anaesthesia with sevoflurane. Mice (n = 72) were randomized to four treatment groups: Sevoflurane alone (control); Propofol group received 5 mg.kg⁻¹; Lidocaine group received 1.5 mg.kg⁻¹ followed by 2 mg.kg⁻¹.h⁻¹ infusion; Methylprednisolone group received 30 mg.kg⁻¹ methylprednisolone. The primary outcome measure was pulmonary metastasis colony count, as assessed by in-vitro proliferation, two weeks post-operatively. This was achieved by treating the post-mortem lung tissue with collagenase IV, straining and culturing for 14 days prior to colony count. Compared with control, lidocaine and propofol each individually reduced pulmonary metastasis colonies; mean (SD) 846 (±581) vs. 88 (±52) vs. 34 (±44) respectively, (p = 0.0001 and p = 0.0001). Methylprednisolone increased lung metastasis, 2555 (±609) vs. 846 (±581), p = 0.0001. Post-operative hepatic metastatic disease and serum interleukin-6 and vascular endothelial growth factor levels were similar in all groups. In conclusion, in a murine model of breast cancer surgery during sevoflurane anaesthesia, propofol and lidocaine each decreased pulmonary metastasis, while methylprednisolone increased it.

Background/Aim: Mortality from breast cancer is usually attributable to metastasis. In vitro data suggest that amide local anaesthetics, e.g. lidocaine, inhibit metastasis by multiple mechanisms and recent in vivo data support this. Experimental data also suggest that opioids may inhibit cisplatin chemotherapy. Whether lidocaine would influence cisplatin chemotherapy has not been evaluated. Materials and Methods: 4T1 cells were injected into the mammary gland of immunocompetent female BALB/c mice, with resection of the tumour under sevoflurane anaesthesia one week later. Mice (n=45) were randomized into one of three groups: The cisplatin group received 3 mg.kg⁻¹ cisplatin; cisplatin and lidocaine group received 3 mg.kg⁻¹ cisplatin and lidocaine bolus of 1.5 mg.kg⁻¹ followed by an infusion of 2 mg.kg-1.h⁻¹. The control group received sevoflurane only. All agents were given perioperatively. After 14 postoperative days, post-mortem lung, serum and liver samples were collected. Primary outcome measure was lung metastasis colony count. Results: During sevoflurane anaesthesia, the addition of lidocaine to cisplatin significantly decreased metastatic lung colony count [(mean±SD) (157±87)] compared to control [846±581, (p=0.001)], and cisplatin alone [580±383, (p=0.018)]. However, liver metastasis colony count was not reduced with the combination of cisplatin and lidocaine (9.3±13.9) when compared to control (74.7±257.3), p=0.78 or to cisplatin alone (110±388.8), p=0.569. Serum VEGF and interleukin-6 concentrations were not significantly different. Conclusion: In a 4T1 murine model of breast cancer surgery, under sevoflurane anaesthesia, lidocaine enhanced the metastasis-inhibiting action of cisplatin. Clinical evaluation of the hypothesis that co-administration of systemic lidocaine during cisplatin chemotherapy seems warranted.