Masae Iwasaki

Dr. Masae Iwasaki

Nippon Medical School Graduate School of Medicine

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

8Years (2019-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 May 2019 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JFJames Freeman
James Freeman
PCPeter D. Crowley
Peter D. Crowley
AFAndrew G. Foley
Andrew G. Foley
HGHelen Gallagher
Helen Gallagher
MIMasae Iwasaki
Masae Iwasaki
DBDonal J. Buggy
Donal J. Buggy
Addressing the hypothesis that anaesthetic-analgesic technique during cancer surgery might influence recurrence or metastatic spread is a research priority. Propofol, which has anti-inflammatory properties in vitro, is clinically associated with reduced risk of cancer recurrence compared with sevoflurane anaesthesia in retrospective studies. Amide local anaesthetics, such as lidocaine, have cancer inhibiting effects in vitro. Steroids have anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive effects and are associated with improved recovery after major non-cancer surgery. We compared the effects of propofol, lidocaine and methylprednisolone on postoperative metastasis in a murine model of breast cancer surgery under sevoflurane anaesthesia. 4T1 tumour cells were introduced into the mammary fat-pad of female BALB/c mice and the resulting tumour resected seven days later under general anaesthesia with sevoflurane. Mice (n = 72) were randomized to four treatment groups: Sevoflurane alone (control); Propofol group received 5 mg.kg−1; Lidocaine group received 1.5 mg.kg−1 followed by 2 mg.kg−1.h−1 infusion; Methylprednisolone group received 30 mg.kg−1 methylprednisolone. The primary outcome measure was pulmonary metastasis colony count, as assessed by in-vitro proliferation, two weeks post-operatively. This was achieved by treating the post-mortem lung tissue with collagenase IV, straining and culturing for 14 days prior to colony count. Compared with control, lidocaine and propofol each individually reduced pulmonary metastasis colonies; mean (SD) 846 (±581) vs. 88 (±52) vs. 34 (±44) respectively, (p = 0.0001 and p = 0.0001). Methylprednisolone increased lung metastasis, 2555 (±609) vs. 846 (±581), p = 0.0001. Post-operative hepatic metastatic disease and serum interleukin-6 and vascular endothelial growth factor levels were similar in all groups. In conclusion, in a murine model of breast cancer surgery during sevoflurane anaesthesia, propofol and lidocaine each decreased pulmonary metastasis, while methylprednisolone increased it.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MIMasashi Ishikawa
Masashi Ishikawa
MIMasae Iwasaki
Masae Iwasaki
Hailin ZhaoHailin Zhao
Hailin Zhao
JSJunichi Saito
Junichi Saito
Cong HuCong Hu
Cong Hu
Daqing MaDaqing Ma
Daqing Ma
Inhalational anaesthetics were previously reported to promote ovarian cancer malignancy, but underlying mechanisms remain unclear. The present study aims to investigate the role of sevoflurane- or desflurane-induced microRNA (miRNA) changes on ovarian cancer cell behaviour. The cultured SKOV3 cells were exposed to 3.6% sevoflurane or 10.3% desflurane for 2 h. Expression of miR-138, -210 and -335 was determined with qRT-PCR. Cell proliferation and migration were assessed with wound healing assay, Ki67 staining and Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK8) assay with or without mimic miR-138/-210 transfections. The miRNA downstream effector, hypoxia inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α), was also analysed with immunofluorescent staining. Sevoflurane or desflurane exposure to cancer cells enhanced their proliferation and migration. miR-138 expression was suppressed by both sevoflurane and desflurane, while miR-210 expression was suppressed only by sevoflurane. miR-335 expression was not changed by either sevoflurane or desflurane exposure. The administration of mimic miR-138 or -210 reduced the promoting effects of sevoflurane and desflurane on cancer cell proliferation and migration, in line with the HIF-1α expression changes. These data indicated that inhalational agents sevoflurane and desflurane enhanced ovarian cancer cell malignancy via miRNA deactivation and HIF-1α. The translational value of this work needs further study.

7 February 2023 in European Journal of Pharmacology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JSJunichi Saito
Junichi Saito
Hailin ZhaoHailin Zhao
Hailin Zhao
LWLingzhi Wu
Lingzhi Wu
MIMasae Iwasaki
Masae Iwasaki
QSQizhe Sun
Qizhe Sun
Daqing MaDaqing Ma
Daqing Ma
Ketamine, a N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist, is commonly used to induce anaesthesia during cancer surgery and relieve neuropathic and cancer pain. This study was conducted to assess whether ketamine has any inhibiting effects on neuroglioma (H4) and lung cancer cells (A549) in vitro. The cultured H4 and A549 cells were treated with ketamine and MK801 (0.1, 1, 10, 100, or 1000 μM) for 24 h. The expressions of glutamate receptors on both types of cancer cells were assessed with qRT-PCR. In addition, cell proliferation and migration were assessed with cell counting Kit-8 and wound healing assays. Cyclin D1, matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP9), phosphorylation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase (pERK), and cleaved-caspase-3 expression together with reactive oxygen species (ROS) were also assessed with Western blot, immunostaining, and/or flowcytometry. NMDA and α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole propionic acid receptors were expressed on both H4 and A549 cells. Ketamine inhibited cancer cell proliferation and migration in a dose-dependent manner by suppressing the cell cycle and inducing apoptosis. Ketamine decreased cyclin D1, pERK, and MMP9 expression. In addition, ketamine increased ROS and cleaved caspase-3 expression and induced apoptosis. The anti-cancer effect of ketamine was more pronounced in A549 cells when compared with H4 cells. MK801 showed similar effects to those of ketamine. Ketamine suppressed cell proliferation and migration in both neuroglioma and lung cancer cells, likely through the antagonization of NMDA receptors.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MIMasashi Ishikawa
Masashi Ishikawa
MIMasae Iwasaki
Masae Iwasaki
Hailin ZhaoHailin Zhao
Hailin Zhao
JSJunichi Saito
Junichi Saito
Cong HuCong Hu
Cong Hu
Daqing MaDaqing Ma
Daqing Ma
Inhalational anesthetics was previously reported to suppress glioma cell malignancy but underlying mechanisms remain unclear. The present study aims to investigate the effects of sevoflurane and desflurane on glioma cell malignancy changes via microRNA (miRNA) modulation. The cultured H4 cells were exposed to 3.6% sevoflurane or 10.3% desflurane for 2 h. The miR-138, -210 and -335 expression were determined with qRT-PCR. Cell proliferation and migration were assessed with wound healing assay, Ki67 staining and cell count kit 8 (CCK8) assay with/without miR-138/-210/-335 inhibitor transfections. The miRNA downstream proteins, hypoxia inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α) and matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP9), were also determined with immunofluorescent staining. Sevoflurane and desflurane exposure to glioma cells inhibited their proliferation and migration. Sevoflurane exposure increased miR-210 expression whereas desflurane exposure upregulated both miR-138 and miR-335 expressions. The administration of inhibitor of miR-138, -210 or -335 inhibited the suppressing effects of sevoflurane or desflurane on cell proliferation and migration, in line with the HIF-1α and MMP9 expression changes. These data indicated that inhalational anesthetics, sevoflurane and desflurane, inhibited glioma cell malignancy via miRNAs upregulation and their downstream effectors, HIF-1α and MMP9, downregulation. The implication of the current study warrants further study.

12 August 2022 in Cell Biology and Toxicology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MIMasae Iwasaki
Masae Iwasaki
HZHailin Zhao
Hailin Zhao
CHCong Hu
Cong Hu
JSJunichi Saito
Junichi Saito
LWLingzhi Wu
Lingzhi Wu
Daqing MaDaqing Ma
Daqing Ma
Anaesthetics may modify colorectal cancer cell biology which potentially affects long-term survival. This study aims to compare propofol and sevoflurane regarding with the direct anaesthetic effects on cancer malignancy and the indirect effects on host immunity in a cancer xenograft mode of mice. Cultured colon cancer cell (Caco-2) was injected subcutaneously to nude mice (day 1). Mice were exposed to either 1.5% sevoflurane for 1.5 h or propofol (20 μg g−1; ip injection) with or without 4 μg g−1 lipopolysaccharide (LPS; ip) from days 15 to 17, compared with those without anaesthetic exposure as controls. The clinical endpoints including tumour volumes over 70 mm3 were closely monitored up to day 28. Tumour samples from the other cohorts were collected on day 18 for PCR array, qRT-PCR, western blotting and immunofluorescent assessment. Propofol treatment reduced tumour size (mean ± SD; 23.0 ± 6.2mm3) when compared to sevoflurane (36.0 ± 0.3mm3) (p = 0.008) or control (23.6 ± 4.7mm3). Propofol decreased hypoxia inducible factor 1α (HIF1α), interleukin 1β (IL1β), and hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) gene expressions and increased tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases 2 (TIMP-2) gene and protein expression in comparison to sevoflurane in the tumour tissue. LPS suppressed tumour growth in any conditions whilst increased TIMP-2 and anti-cancer neutrophil marker expressions and decreased macrophage marker expressions compared to those in the LPS-untreated groups. Our data indicated that sevoflurane increased cancer development when compared with propofol in vivo under non-surgical condition. Anaesthetics tested in this study did not alter the effects of LPS as an immune modulator in changing immunocyte phenotype and suppressing cancer development.

25 June 2022 in Journal of Nippon Medical School
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MIMasae Iwasaki
Masae Iwasaki
MIMasashi Ishikawa
Masashi Ishikawa
DNDai Namizato
Dai Namizato
ASAtsuhiro Sakamoto
Atsuhiro Sakamoto
Background: A growing number of older patients are undergoing surgeries. The reliable pre-operative predictive factors of surgical mortality among older patients remained unclear. This study compared the predictive factors for 30-day survival in patients over 90 years old after their non-cardiac surgery. Methods: A retrospective study at Nippon Medical School hospital was performed for patients aged >90 years who underwent non-cardiac surgeries between 2010 and 2020. Measurements included age, gender, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status (ASA-PS), pre-operative Charlson score, pre-operative fall risk assessment, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG-PS), the modified 5-item frailty index (mFI-5), the presence of intra-operative transfusion, post-operative complications, and 30-day survival post-surgery. Results: A total of 327 cases of elective surgery and 149 cases of emergency surgery were examined. The non-survival group (n=20, 4.2%) had significantly worse pre-operative ASA-PS in emergency cases (non-survival vs. survivor group, 2.8 [2-3] vs. 2.3 [1-4], p=0.045), ECOG-PS (3.0 [2-4] vs. 1.0 [0-4], p<0.001), and mFI-5 values (3.0 [1-4] vs. 1.0 [0-3], p<0.001), more emergency cases (75.0% vs. 36.2%, p=0.004), and a greater need for intra-operative transfusion (55.0% vs. 13.4%, p<0.001). Among the frailty assessment methods, ECOG-PS was the most efficient for 30-day mortality (area under curve, ECOG-PS: 0.98, p<0.001; mFI-5: 0.86, p3 was significantly associated with 30-day mortality (ECOG-PS: Kaplan-Maier curve, p<0.001, Log-rank test; odds ratio 1.71, 95%CI: 1.35-2.16, p90 years old, ECOG-PS>3 was significantly correlated with 30-day mortality.