Darren Ghent

Dr. Darren Ghent

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications

26 February 2019 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MMMaria Anna Martin
Maria Anna Martin
DGDarren Ghent
Darren Ghent
APAna Cordeiro Pires
Ana Cordeiro Pires
Frank-Michael GöttscheFrank-Michael Göttsche
Frank-Michael Göttsche
JCJan Cermak
Jan Cermak
JRJohn J. Remedios
John J. Remedios
Global land surface temperature (LST) data derived from satellite-based infrared radiance measurements are highly valuable for various applications in climate research. While in situ validation of satellite LST data sets is a challenging task, it is needed to obtain quantitative information on their accuracy. In the standardised approach to multi-sensor validation presented here for the first time, LST data sets obtained with state-of-the-art retrieval algorithms from several sensors (AATSR, GOES, MODIS, and SEVIRI) are matched spatially and temporally with multiple years of in situ data from globally distributed stations representing various land cover types in a consistent manner. Commonality of treatment is essential for the approach: all satellite data sets are projected to the same spatial grid, and transformed into a common harmonized format, thereby allowing comparison with in situ data to be undertaken with the same methodology and data processing. The large data base of standardised satellite LST provided by the European Space Agency’s GlobTemperature project makes previously difficult to perform LST studies and applications more feasible and easier to implement. The satellite data sets are validated over either three or ten years, depending on data availability. Average accuracies over the whole time span are generally within ±2.0 K during night, and within ± 4.0 K during day. Time series analyses over individual stations reveal seasonal cycles. They stem, depending on the station, from surface anisotropy, topography, or heterogeneous land cover. The results demonstrate the maturity of the LST products, but also highlight the need to carefully consider their temporal and spatial properties when using them for scientific purposes.

22 November 2017 in Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DGDarren Ghent
Darren Ghent
GCG. K. Corlett
G. K. Corlett
Frank-Michael GöttscheFrank-Michael Göttsche
Frank-Michael Göttsche
JRJ. J. Remedios
J. J. Remedios
The Leicester Along‐Track Scanning Radiometer (ATSR) and Sea and Land Surface Temperature Radiometer (SLSTR) Processor for LAnd Surface Temperature (LASPLAST) provides global land surface temperature (LST) products from thermal infrared radiance data. In this paper, the state‐of‐the‐art version of LASPLAST, as deployed in the GlobTemperature project, is described and applied to data from the Advanced Along‐Track Scanning Radiometer (AATSR). The LASPLAST retrieval formulation for LST is a nadir‐only, two‐channel, split‐window algorithm, based on biome classification, fractional vegetation, and across‐track water vapor dependences. It incorporates globally robust retrieval coefficients derived using highly sampled atmosphere profiles. LASPLAST benefits from appropriate spatial resolution auxiliary information and a new probabilistic‐based cloud flagging algorithm. For the first time for a satellite‐derived LST product, pixel‐level uncertainties characterized in terms of random, locally correlated, and systematic components are provided. The new GlobTemperature GT_ATS_2P Version 1.0 product has been validated for 1 year of AATSR data (2009) against in situ measurements acquired from “gold standard reference” stations: Gobabeb, Namibia, and Evora, Portugal; seven Surface Radiation Budget stations, and the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement station at Southern Great Plains. These data show average absolute biases for the GT_ATS_2P Version 1.0 product of 1.00 K in the daytime and 1.08 K in the nighttime. The improvements in data provenance including better accuracy, fully traceable retrieval coefficients, quantified uncertainty, and more detailed information in the new harmonized format of the GT_ATS_2P product will allow for more significant exploitation of the historical LST data record from the ATSRs and a valuable near‐real‐time service from the Sea and Land Surface Temperature Radiometers (SLSTRs).

7 October 2010 in Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DGDarren Ghent
Darren Ghent
JKJörg Kaduk
Jörg Kaduk
JRJ. Remedios
J. Remedios
JAJonas Ardö
Jonas Ardö
Heiko BalzterHeiko Balzter
Heiko Balzter

30 April 2019 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DGDarren Ghent
Darren Ghent
KVKaren L. Veal
Karen L. Veal
TTTim Trent
Tim Trent
EDEmma Dodd
Emma Dodd
HSHarjinder Sembhi
Harjinder Sembhi
JRJohn Remedios
John Remedios
The accuracy of land surface temperature (LST) observations is critical to many applications. Any observation of LST is subject to incomplete knowledge, so an accurate assessment of the uncertainty budget is critical. We present a comprehensive and consistent approach to determining an uncertainty budget for LST products. We apply this approach to the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) instrument on-board the Aqua satellite. In order to generate the uncertainty model, a new implementation of the generalised split-window algorithm is applied, in which retrieval coefficients are categorised by viewing angle and water vapour. Validation of the LST against in situ data shows a mean absolute bias of 0.37 K for daytime and 0.73 K for nighttime. The average standard deviation per site is 1.53 K for daytime and 1.21 K for nighttime. Uncertainties from the implemented model are estimates in their own right and are also validated. We do this by comparing the standard deviation of the differences between the satellite and in situ LSTs, and the total uncertainties of the validation matchups. We show that the uncertainty model provides a good fit. Our approach offers a framework for quantifying uncertainties for LST that is equally applicable across different sensors and different retrieval approaches.

17 March 2019 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YZYitong Zheng
Yitong Zheng
Huazhong RenHuazhong Ren
Huazhong Ren
JGJinxin Guo
Jinxin Guo
DGDarren Ghent
Darren Ghent
Kevin TanseyKevin Tansey
Kevin Tansey
SCShanshan Chen
Shanshan Chen
Land surface temperature (LST) is a crucial parameter in the interaction between the ground and the atmosphere. The Sentinel-3A Sea and Land Surface Temperature Radiometer (SLSTR) provides global daily coverage of day and night observation in the wavelength range of 0.55 to 12.0 μm. LST retrieved from SLSTR is expected to be widely used in different fields of earth surface monitoring. This study aimed to develop a split-window (SW) algorithm to estimate LST from two-channel thermal infrared (TIR) and one-channel middle infrared (MIR) images of SLSTR observation. On the basis of the conventional SW algorithm, using two TIR channels for the daytime observation, the MIR data, with a higher atmospheric transmittance and a lower sensitivity to land surface emissivity, were further used to develop a modified SW algorithm for the nighttime observation. To improve the retrieval accuracy, the algorithm coefficients were obtained in different subranges, according to the view zenith angle, column water vapor, and brightness temperature. The proposed algorithm can theoretically estimate LST with an error lower than 1 K on average. The algorithm was applied to northern China and southern UK, and the retrieved LST captured the surface features for both daytime and nighttime. Finally, ground validation was conducted over seven sites (four in the USA and three in China). Results showed that LST could be estimated with an error mostly within 1.5 to 2.5 K from the algorithm, and the error of the nighttime algorithm involved with MIR data was about 0.5 K lower than the daytime algorithm.