Sheryl A. Tittlemier

Sheryl A. Tittlemier


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
14 July 2015 in Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
STSheryl A. Tittlemier
Sheryl A. Tittlemier
DDDainna Drul
Dainna Drul
MRMike Roscoe
Mike Roscoe
TMTwylla McKendry
Twylla McKendry

31 May 2013 in Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
STSheryl A. Tittlemier
Sheryl A. Tittlemier
MRMike Roscoe
Mike Roscoe
RTRobert Trelka
Robert Trelka
DGDon Gaba
Don Gaba
JCJason M. Chan
Jason M. Chan
TGTom Gräfenhan
Tom Gräfenhan

3 February 2021 in World Mycotoxin Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
STSheryl A. Tittlemier
Sheryl A. Tittlemier
JBJ. Brunkhorst
J. Brunkhorst
BCB. Cramer
B. Cramer
MDM.C. DeRosa
M.C. DeRosa
VLV.M.T. Lattanzio
V.M.T. Lattanzio
MSM.W. Sumarah
M.W. Sumarah
This review summarises developments on the analysis of various matrices for mycotoxins published in the period from mid-2019 to mid-2020. Notable developments in all aspects of mycotoxin analysis, from sampling and quality assurance/quality control of analytical results, to the various detection and quantitation technologies ranging from single mycotoxin biosensors to comprehensive instrumental methods are presented and discussed. Aside from sampling and quality control, discussion of this past year’s developments is organised by detection and quantitation technology and covers chromatography with targeted or non-targeted high resolution mass spectrometry, tandem mass spectrometry, detection other than mass spectrometry, biosensors, as well as assays that use alternatives to antibodies. This critical review aims to briefly present the most important recent developments and trends in mycotoxin determination as well as to address limitations of the presented methodologies.

6 February 2020 in World Mycotoxin Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
STSheryl A. Tittlemier
Sheryl A. Tittlemier
BCB. Cramer
B. Cramer
CDChiara Dall'Asta
Chiara Dall'Asta
MIM.H. Iha
M.H. Iha
VLV.M.T. Lattanzio
V.M.T. Lattanzio
MSM. Sumarah
M. Sumarah
This review summarises developments on the analysis of various matrices for mycotoxins that have been published in the period from mid-2018 to mid-2019. Analytical methods to determine aflatoxins,Alternaria toxins, ergot alkaloids, fumonisins, ochratoxins, patulin, trichothecenes, and zearalenone are covered in individual sections. Advances in sampling strategies are also discussed in a dedicated section. In addition, developments in multi-mycotoxin methods – including comprehensive mass spectrometric-based methods as well as simple immunoassays – are also reviewed. This critical review aims to briefly present the most important recent developments and trends in mycotoxin determination as well as to address limitations of the presented methodologies.

27 May 2011 in Food Additives & Contaminants: Part A
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
STSheryl A. Tittlemier
Sheryl A. Tittlemier
Elisabeth VargaElisabeth Varga
Elisabeth Varga
PSP.M. Scott
P.M. Scott
RKR. Krska
R. Krska
The mycotoxin ochratoxin A (OTA) is known to be heterogeneously distributed both intrinsically (from one individual food item to the next) as well as distributionally (throughout a sample of individual food items) in cereals and cereal-based foods. Therefore, proper sampling and sample comminution are special challenges, but are prerequisites for obtaining sound analytical data. This paper outlines the issue of the sampling process for cereals and cereal-based foods, starting with the planning phase, followed by the sampling step itself and the formation of analytical samples. The sampling of whole grain and retail-level cereal-based foods will be discussed. Furthermore, possibilities to reduce sampling variance are presented.

5 June 2019 in Toxins
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JTJames Tucker
James Tucker
ABAna Badea
Ana Badea
RBRichard Blagden
Richard Blagden
KPKerri Pleskach
Kerri Pleskach
STSheryl A. Tittlemier
Sheryl A. Tittlemier
Dilantha FernandoDilantha Fernando
Dilantha Fernando
Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) is a multipurpose crop that can be harvested as grain or cut prior to maturity for use as forage. Fusarium head blight (FHB) is a devastating disease of barley that reduces quality of grain. FHB can also result in the accumulation of mycotoxins such as deoxynivalenol (DON). Breeding FHB resistant varieties has been a long-term goal of many barley-producing countries, including Canada. While the genetic basis of DON detoxification via production of less-phytotoxic conjugates such as DON-3-glucoside (DON3G) is well documented in barley, little information exists in reference to varietal response. Over two years, 16 spring, two-row barley genotypes, of importance to western Canadian barley breeding programs, were grown as short-rows and inoculated following spike emergence with a Fusarium graminearum conidia suspension. Half of the plots were harvested at soft dough stage and then dissected into rachis and grain components, whereas the remainder was harvested at maturity. Multiple Fusarium-mycotoxins were assayed using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Mycotoxin content was elevated at the earlier harvest point, especially in the rachis tissue. DON3G constituted a significant percentage (26%) of total trichothecene content and thus its co-occurrence with DON should be considered by barley industries. DON3G was highly correlated with DON and 3-acetyl-deoxynivalenol (3ADON). The ratio of D3G/DON exhibited consistency across genotypes, however more-resistant genotypes were characterized by a higher ratio at the soft-dough stage followed by a decrease at maturity. Plant breeding practices that use DON content as a biomarker for resistance would likely result in the development of barley cultivars with lower total DON-like compounds.