Sheng-Yang Lee

Dr. Sheng-Yang Lee

Director, Department of Orthodontists, Taipei Municipal Wanfang Hospital
+2

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

26Years (2001-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 February 2002 in Clinical Oral Implants Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
HHHaw‐Ming Huang
Haw‐Ming Huang
Sheng-Yang LeeSheng-Yang Lee
Sheng-Yang Lee
CYChing‐Ying Yeh
Ching‐Ying Yeh
CLChe‐Tong Lin
Che‐Tong Lin


29 March 2015 in BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CYChing-Yu Yen
Ching-Yu Yen
MHMing-Feng Hou
Ming-Feng Hou
ZYZhi-Wen Yang
Zhi-Wen Yang
JTJen-Yang Tang
Jen-Yang Tang
KLKun-Tzu Li
Kun-Tzu Li
HCHsueh-Wei Chang
Hsueh-Wei Chang
Grape seeds extract (GSE) is a famous health food supplement for its antioxidant property. Different concentrations of GSE may have different impacts on cellular oxidative/reduction homeostasis. Antiproliferative effect of GSE has been reported in many cancers but rarely in oral cancer. The aim of this study is to examine the antioral cancer effects of different concentrations of GSE in terms of cell viability, apoptosis, reactive oxygen species (ROS), mitochondrial function, and DNA damage. High concentrations (50–400 μg/ml) of GSE dose-responsively inhibited proliferation of oral cancer Ca9-22 cells but low concentrations (1–10 μg/ml) of GSE showed a mild effect in a MTS assay. For apoptosis analyses, subG1 population and annexin V intensity in high concentrations of GSE-treated Ca9-22 cells was increased but less so at low concentrations. ROS generation and mitochondrial depolarization increased dose-responsively at high concentrations but showed minor changes at low concentrations of GSE in Ca9-22 cells. Additionally, high concentrations of GSE dose-responsively induced more γH2AX-based DNA damage than low concentrations. Differential concentrations of GSE may have a differentially antiproliferative function against oral cancer cells via differential apoptosis, oxidative stress and DNA damage.

1 October 2005 in Journal of Endodontics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
HHHaw-Ming Huang
Haw-Ming Huang
KOKeng-Liang Ou
Keng-Liang Ou
WWWei-Nang Wang
Wei-Nang Wang
WCWen-Ta Chiu
Wen-Ta Chiu
CLChe-Tong Lin
Che-Tong Lin
Sheng-Yang LeeSheng-Yang Lee
Sheng-Yang Lee

18 July 2018 in Oncology Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
HCHsueh‑Wei Chang
Hsueh‑Wei Chang
CYChing‑Yu Yen
Ching‑Yu Yen
CCChung‑Ho Chen
Chung‑Ho Chen
JTJun‑Hsu Tsai
Jun‑Hsu Tsai
JTJen‑Yang Tang
Jen‑Yang Tang
Sheng-Yang LeeSheng-Yang Lee
Sheng-Yang Lee
Integrin signaling may modulate several different functions involved in cell migration, invasion, proliferation and motility, and is a potential candidate biomarker for oral cancer. In the present study, a total of four integrin genes were evaluated as potential biomarkers of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). Gene expression was determined using the reverse transcription‑quantitative polymerase chain reaction in 55 OSCC and 55 matched normal oral tissues. The performance of individual and combined biomarkers was analyzed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis based on the relative mRNA expression (OSCC vs. matched oral tissue from the tumor‑free margin), which was calculated using the ΔΔCq value (ΔCq of OSCC‑ΔCq of oral tissue from the tumor‑free margin of the same patient). In the individual ROC analysis, the areas under the ROC curve (AUCs) of relative mRNA expression (ΔΔCq) of integrin subunit α3 (ITGA3), integrin subunit α5 (ITGA5), integrin subunit β1 (ITGB1) and integrin subunit β6 (ITGB6) in all tumor locations were 0.724, 0.698, 0.640 and 0.657, respectively. For locations 2 (tongue/mouth part) and 3 (edentulous ridge), their individual AUC values were 0.840, 0.765, 0.725 and 0.763, respectively. In the cumulative ROC analysis, ITGA3, ITGA5 and ITGB1 genes exhibited the highest combined AUC values (0.809 and 0.871 for all locations and locations 2 and 3 combined, respectively) compared with other biomarker combinations. In conclusion, the results of the present study identified that higher mRNA expressions of ITGA3, ITGA5, ITGB1 and ITGB6 genes are suitable for OSCC diagnosis biomarkers. Cumulative ROC analysis indicated an improved overall performance compared with the best individual integrin biomarker of OSCC.

5 October 2021 in Cells
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
WLWei-Zhen Lew
Wei-Zhen Lew
SFSheng-Wei Feng
Sheng-Wei Feng
Sheng-Yang LeeSheng-Yang Lee
Sheng-Yang Lee
Haw-Ming HuangHaw-Ming Huang
Haw-Ming Huang
Magnets have been widely used in dentistry for orthodontic tooth movement and denture retention. Nevertheless, criticisms have arisen regarding the biosafety of static magnetic field (SMF) effects on surrounding tissues. Various controversial pieces of evidence have been discussed regarding SMFs on cellular biophysics, but little consensus has been reached, especially in the field of dentistry. Thus, the present paper will first review the safe use of SMFs in the oral cavity and as an additive therapy to orthodontic tooth movement and periodontium regeneration. Then, studies regarding SMF-incorporated implants are reviewed to investigate the advantageous effects of SMFs on osseointegration and the underlying mechanisms. Finally, a review of current developments in dentistry surrounding the combination of magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) and SMFs is made to clarify potential future clinical applications.