Goran Janackovic

Dr. Goran Janackovic

University of Nis, Faculty of Occupational Safety, Niš, Serbia
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
26 November 2013 in South African Journal of Industrial Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GJGoran Janackovic
Goran Janackovic
SSSuzana M. Savic
Suzana M. Savic
Miomir StankovicMiomir Stankovic
Miomir Stankovic
Selection and ranking of occupational safety indicators based on fuzzy AHP: A case study in road construction companies

1 May 2020 in Safety Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GJGoran Janackovic
Goran Janackovic
ESEvica Stojiljkovic
Evica Stojiljkovic
MGMiroljub Grozdanovic
Miroljub Grozdanovic

22 July 2016 in Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MGMiroljub Grozdanovic
Miroljub Grozdanovic
GJGoran Janackovic
Goran Janackovic
ESEvica Stojiljkovic
Evica Stojiljkovic
This paper presents an analytical–synthetic model of ergonomic research of the abilities of the dispatcher/operator in the control room for the automatic control of railway transportation. Twenty performance indicators describing the operators’ performance (work capacity and perceptive abilities) and the main characteristics of the control room (work organization and ergo-technical analysis) are identified. A group fuzzy analytic hierarchy process is applied in the process of ranking and selection of key performance indicators of railway control rooms. The selected key performance indicators (the operator’s hand movement, visual symptoms of fatigue, device error analysis, location and dimensions of the control desk) are analysed in detail.

1 December 2016 in South African Journal of Industrial Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SKSrdja Kovacevic
Srdja Kovacevic
LPLjubisa Papic
Ljubisa Papic
GJGoran Janackovic
Goran Janackovic
SSSuzana Savic
Suzana Savic
THE ANALYSIS OF HUMAN ERROR AS CAUSES IN THE MAINTENANCE OF MACHINES: A CASE STUDY IN MINING COMPANIES

1 January 2018 in International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MGMiroljub Grozdanovic
Miroljub Grozdanovic
GJGoran Janackovic
Goran Janackovic

13 July 2025 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GJGoran Janackovic
Goran Janackovic
ZVZarko Goran Vranjanac
Zarko Goran Vranjanac
Dejan M. VasovićDejan M. Vasović
Dejan M. Vasović
Hazards stemming from extreme natural events have exhibited heightened prominence in recent years. The natural hazard management process adopts a comprehensive approach that encompasses all stakeholders involved in the disaster management cycle. “Actions for Resilience” (A4R) represents a standardised concept derived from ISO/TR 22370:2020 that integrates principles from various scientific disciplines to enhance resilience in systems, whether they are socio-ecological systems, communities, or organisations. A4R emphasises proactive measures and interventions aimed at fostering resilience rather than merely reacting to crises or disruptions. It recognises that resilience is a multifaceted concept influenced by various factors, including social, economic, environmental, and institutional dimensions. Central to A4R is the understanding of complex system dynamics. Also, A4R involves rigorous risk assessment to identify potential threats and vulnerabilities within a system, as well as to build adaptive capacity within systems. A4R advocates for the development of resilience metrics and monitoring systems to assess the effectiveness of interventions and track changes in resilience over time. These metrics may include indicators related to social cohesion, ecosystem health, economic stability, and public infrastructure resilience. In this context, the study aims to apply the proposed hierarchy of factors and group decision-making using fuzzy numbers to identify strategic priorities for improving the urban resilience of the pilot area. The identified priority factors are then analysed across different scenarios, and corresponding actions are described in detail.