Matteo Claudio Palpacelli

Prof. Matteo Claudio Palpacelli

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

21Years (2006-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 September 2014 in Mechanism and Machine Theory
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LCLuca Carbonari
Luca Carbonari
Massimo CallegariMassimo Callegari
Massimo Callegari
Giacomo PalmieriGiacomo Palmieri
Giacomo Palmieri
MPMatteo Claudio Palpacelli
Matteo Claudio Palpacelli

20 November 2014 in IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MPMatteo Claudio Palpacelli
Matteo Claudio Palpacelli
LCLuca Carbonari
Luca Carbonari
Giacomo PalmieriGiacomo Palmieri
Giacomo Palmieri
Massimo CallegariMassimo Callegari
Massimo Callegari
This paper presents the design of a reconfigurable 3-DoF parallel kinematics manipulator. The main feature of the device is the ability to change the mobility of its moving platform from pure translation to pure rotation. The manipulator kinematics is conceived so that, when a particular configuration of the manipulator is reached, the transition between the two working modes is possible by changing the configuration of a metamorphic universal joint, which is used to connect the legs of the manipulator with the moving platform. The mechanical design of the joint, which is in fact a lockable spherical joint, is illustrated. With the joint integrated into the robot architecture, an instantaneous overconstrained kinematics is exploited to manage the phase of reconfiguration of the whole mechatronic device. A kineto-static analysis provides information about the influence of geometric parameters on its functional design. The manipulator shows simple kinematics and statics models, as well as good kinematic and static performances. Eventually, the versatility of the manipulator is shown by proposing some advanced manufacturing applications in which it could find use.

1 December 2006 in Mechatronics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Massimo CallegariMassimo Callegari
Massimo Callegari
MPMatteo Claudio Palpacelli
Matteo Claudio Palpacelli
MPMarco Principi
Marco Principi

3 June 2021 in Machines
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GCGiorgia Chiriatti
Giorgia Chiriatti
Giacomo PalmieriGiacomo Palmieri
Giacomo Palmieri
CSCecilia Scoccia
Cecilia Scoccia
MPMatteo Claudio Palpacelli
Matteo Claudio Palpacelli
Massimo CallegariMassimo Callegari
Massimo Callegari
In a human–robot collaboration scenario, operator safety is the main problem and must be guaranteed under all conditions. Collision avoidance control techniques are essential to improve operator safety and robot flexibility by preventing impacts that can occur between the robot and humans or with objects inadvertently left within the operational workspace. On this basis, collision avoidance algorithms for moving obstacles are presented in this paper: inspired by algorithms already developed by the authors for planar manipulators, algorithms are adapted for the 6-DOF collaborative manipulators by Universal Robots, and some new contributions are introduced. First, in this work, the safety region wrapping each link of the manipulator assumes a cylindrical shape whose radius varies according to the speed of the colliding obstacle, so that dynamical obstacles are avoided with increased safety regions in order to reduce the risk, whereas fixed obstacles allow us to use smaller safety regions, facilitating the motion of the robot. In addition, three different modalities for the collision avoidance control law are proposed, which differ in the type of motion admitted for the perturbation of the end-effector: the general mode allows for a 6-DOF perturbation, but restrictions can be imposed on the orientation part of the avoidance motion using 4-DOF or 3-DOF modes. In order to demonstrate the effectiveness of the control strategy, simulations with dynamic and fixed obstacles are presented and discussed. Simulations are also used to estimate the required computational effort in order to verify the transferability to a real system.

30 September 2020 in Biomimetics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Daniele CostaDaniele Costa
Daniele Costa
Giacomo PalmieriGiacomo Palmieri
Giacomo Palmieri
MPMatteo Claudio Palpacelli
Matteo Claudio Palpacelli
David ScaradozziDavid Scaradozzi
David Scaradozzi
Massimo CallegariMassimo Callegari
Massimo Callegari
Bio-inspired solutions devised for autonomous underwater robots are currently being investigated by researchers worldwide as a way to improve propulsion. Despite efforts to harness the substantial potential payoffs of marine animal locomotion, biological system performance still has far to go. In order to address this very ambitious objective, the authors of this study designed and manufactured a series of ostraciiform swimming robots over the past three years. However, the pursuit of the maximum propulsive efficiency by which to maximize robot autonomy while maintaining acceptable maneuverability ultimately drove us to improve our design and move from ostraciiform to carangiform locomotion. In order to comply with the tail motion required by the aforementioned swimmers, the authors designed a transmission system capable of converting the continuous rotation of a single motor in the travelling wave-shaped undulations of a multijoint serial mechanism. The propulsive performance of the resulting thruster (i.e., the caudal fin), which constitutes the mechanism end effector, was investigated by means of computational fluid dynamics techniques. Finally, in order to compute the resulting motion of the robot, numerical predictions were integrated into a multibody model that also accounted for the mass distribution inside the robotic swimmer and the hydrodynamic forces resulting from the relative motion between its body and the surrounding fluid. Dynamic analysis allowed the performance of the robotic propulsion to be computed while in the cruising condition.

16 May 2012 in Journal of Robotics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Giacomo PalmieriGiacomo Palmieri
Giacomo Palmieri
MPMatteo Claudio Palpacelli
Matteo Claudio Palpacelli
MBM. Battistelli
M. Battistelli
Massimo CallegariMassimo Callegari
Massimo Callegari
Two different visual servoing controls have been developed to govern a translating parallel manipulator with an eye-in-hand configuration, That is, a position-based and an image-based controller. The robot must be able to reach and grasp a target randomly positioned in the workspace; the control must be adaptive to compensate motions of the target in the 3D space. The trajectory planning strategy ensures the continuity of the velocity vector for both PBVS and IBVS controls, whereas a replanning event is needed. A comparison between the two approaches is given in terms of accuracy, fastness, and stability in relation to the robot peculiar characteristics.