David Lesbarrères

David Lesbarrères


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

25Years (2002-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 July 2012 in Trends in Ecology & Evolution
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DLDavid Lesbarrères
David Lesbarrères
LFLenore Fahrig
Lenore Fahrig

6 October 2015 in Journal of Insect Conservation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JBJames H. Baxter-Gilbert
James H. Baxter-Gilbert
JRJulia L. Riley
Julia L. Riley
CNChristopher J. H. Neufeld
Christopher J. H. Neufeld
JLJacqueline D. Litzgus
Jacqueline D. Litzgus
DLDavid Lesbarrères
David Lesbarrères

2 November 2011 in Biology Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
DLDavid Lesbarrères
David Lesbarrères
ABAna Balseiro
Ana Balseiro
JBJ. Brunner
J. Brunner
VCV. G. Chinchar
V. G. Chinchar
Amanda Linda Jean DuffusAmanda Linda Jean Duffus
Amanda Linda Jean Duffus
MGM. J. Gray
M. J. Gray
Emerging infectious diseases are a significant threat to global biodiversity. While historically overlooked, a group of iridoviruses in the genus Ranavirus has been responsible for die-offs in captive and wild amphibian, reptile and fish populations around the globe over the past two decades. In order to share contemporary information on ranaviruses and identify critical research directions, the First International Symposium on Ranaviruses was held in July 2011 in Minneapolis, MN, USA. Twenty-three scientists and veterinarians from nine countries examined the ecology and evolution of ranavirus–host interactions, potential reservoirs, transmission dynamics, as well as immunological and histopathological responses to infection. In addition, speakers discussed possible mechanisms for die-offs, and conservation strategies to control outbreaks.

4 March 2009 in Molecular Ecology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AKA. G. Kidd
A. G. Kidd
JBJ. Bowman
J. Bowman
DLDavid Lesbarrères
David Lesbarrères
ASA. I. Schulte‐Hostedde
A. I. Schulte‐Hostedde

25 March 2015 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JBJames H. Baxter-Gilbert
James H. Baxter-Gilbert
JRJulia L. Riley
Julia L. Riley
DLDavid Lesbarrères
David Lesbarrères
JLJacqueline D. Litzgus
Jacqueline D. Litzgus
Roadways pose serious threats to animal populations. The installation of roadway mitigation measures is becoming increasingly common, yet studies that rigorously evaluate the effectiveness of these conservation tools remain rare. A highway expansion project in Ontario, Canada included exclusion fencing and ecopassages as mitigation measures designed to offset detrimental effects to one of the most imperial groups of vertebrates, reptiles. Taking a multispecies approach, we used a Before-After-Control-Impact study design to compare reptile abundance on the highway before and after mitigation at an Impact site and a Control site from 1 May to 31 August in 2012 and 2013. During this time, radio telemetry, wildlife cameras, and an automated PIT-tag reading system were used to monitor reptile movements and use of ecopassages. Additionally, a willingness to utilize experiment was conducted to quantify turtle behavioral responses to ecopassages. We found no difference in abundance of turtles on the road between the un-mitigated and mitigated highways, and an increase in the percentage of both snakes and turtles detected dead on the road post-mitigation, suggesting that the fencing was not effective. Although ecopassages were used by reptiles, the number of crossings through ecopassages was lower than road-surface crossings. Furthermore, turtle willingness to use ecopassages was lower than that reported in previous arena studies, suggesting that effectiveness of ecopassages may be compromised when alternative crossing options are available (e.g., through holes in exclusion structures). Our rigorous evaluation of reptile roadway mitigation demonstrated that when exclusion structures fail, the effectiveness of population connectivity structures is compromised. Our project emphasizes the need to design mitigation measures with the biology and behavior of the target species in mind, to implement mitigation designs in a rigorous fashion, and quantitatively evaluate road mitigation to ensure allow for adaptive management and optimization of these increasingly important conservation tools.

1 February 2014 in Biological Conservation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DLDavid Lesbarrères
David Lesbarrères
SASara L. Ashpole
Sara L. Ashpole
CBChristine A. Bishop
Christine A. Bishop
GBGabriel Blouin-Demers
Gabriel Blouin-Demers
RBRonald J. Brooks
Ronald J. Brooks
SLStephen C. Lougheed
Stephen C. Lougheed