Andrey Kiselev

Mr. Andrey Kiselev


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

8Years (2019-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
8 May 2019 in Resources
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AKAndrey Kiselev
Andrey Kiselev
E.R. MagarilE.R. Magaril
E.R. Magaril
RMRomen Magaril
Romen Magaril
Deborah PanepintoDeborah Panepinto
Deborah Panepinto
Marco RavinaMarco Ravina
Marco Ravina
MariaChiara ZanettiMariaChiara Zanetti
MariaChiara Zanetti
Today it is obvious that the existing linear model of the economy does not correlate with the principles of sustainable development. The circular economy model can replace the current linear economy whilst addressing the issues of environmental deterioration, social equity and long-term economic growth. In the context of effectively implementing circular economy objectives, particular importance should be attributed to wastewater treatment sludge management, due to the possibility of recovering valuable raw materials and using its energy potential. Anaerobic digestion is one of the methods of recovering energy from sewage sludge. The main goal of this study is to make a preliminary evaluation of possible sewage sludge biogas and biomethane solutions using a computation model called MCBioCH4 and compare its results with laboratory tests of sewage sludge fermentation from the northern wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) of Ekaterinburg (Russian Federation). Laboratory experiments were conducted to determine the volume and qualitative composition of biogas produced throughout anaerobic fermentation of raw materials coming from the WWTP. The specific productivity of samples ranged between 308.46 Nm3/tvs and 583.08 Nm3/tvs depending if mesophilic or thermophilic conditions were analyzed, or if the experiment was conducted with or without sludge pre-treatment. Output values from the laboratory were used as input for MCBioCH4 to calculate the flow of biogas or biomethane produced. For the case study of Ekaterinburg two possible energy conversion options were selected: B-H (biogas combustion with cogeneration of electrical and thermal energy) and M-T (biomethane to be used in transports). The results of the energy module showed a net energy content of the biogas between 6575 MWh/year and 7200 MWh/year. Both options yielded a favorable greenhouse gas (GHG) balance, meaning that avoided emissions are higher than produced emissions. The results discussion also showed that, in this case, the B-H option is preferable to the M-T option. The implementation of the biogas/biomethane energy conversion system in Ekaterinburg WWTP necessitates further investigations to clarify the remaining technical and economic aspects

1 January 2019 in Bulletin of Ural Federal University. Series Economics and Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AKAndrey Kiselev
Andrey Kiselev
UYUral Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin
Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin
E.R. MagarilE.R. Magaril
E.R. Magaril