Joris Quik

Joris Quik

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

20Years (2007-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
8 May 2009 in Environmental Science & Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KHKaren Van Hoecke
Karen Van Hoecke
JQJoris Quik
Joris Quik
JMJoanna Dorota Mankiewicz-Boczek
Joanna Dorota Mankiewicz-Boczek
KSKarel A.C. De Schamphelaere
Karel A.C. De Schamphelaere
AEAndreas Elsaesser
Andreas Elsaesser
CJColin Janssen
Colin Janssen

1 January 2014 in Water Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JQJoris Quik
Joris Quik
IVI. Velzeboer
I. Velzeboer
MWM. Wouterse
M. Wouterse
AKAlbert Koelmans
Albert Koelmans
DMD. van de Meent
D. van de Meent

25 April 2014 in Environmental Science & Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JMJohannes A. J. Meesters
Johannes A. J. Meesters
AKAlbert Koelmans
Albert Koelmans
JQJoris Quik
Joris Quik
AHA. Jan Hendriks
A. Jan Hendriks
DMDik van de Meent
Dik van de Meent
Screening level models for environmental assessment of engineered nanoparticles (ENP) are not generally available. Here, we present SimpleBox4Nano (SB4N) as the first model of this type, assess its validity, and evaluate it by comparisons with a known material flow model. SB4N expresses ENP transport and concentrations in and across air, rain, surface waters, soil, and sediment, accounting for nanospecific processes such as aggregation, attachment, and dissolution. The model solves simultaneous mass balance equations (MBE) using simple matrix algebra. The MBEs link all concentrations and transfer processes using first-order rate constants for all processes known to be relevant for ENPs. The first-order rate constants are obtained from the literature. The output of SB4N is mass concentrations of ENPs as free dispersive species, heteroaggregates with natural colloids, and larger natural particles in each compartment in time and at steady state. Known scenario studies for Switzerland were used to demonstrate the impact of the transport processes included in SB4N on the prediction of environmental concentrations. We argue that SB4N-predicted environmental concentrations are useful as background concentrations in environmental risk assessment.

3 February 2015 in Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
WPWillie Peijnenburg
Willie Peijnenburg
Mohammed BaaloushaMohammed Baalousha
Mohammed Baalousha
Jingwen ChenJingwen Chen
Jingwen Chen
QCQasim Chaudry
Qasim Chaudry
FKFrank von der Kammer
Frank von der Kammer
AKAlbert Koelmans
Albert Koelmans
Proper understanding of the basic processes and specific properties of engineered nanomaterials (NMs) that modify the fate and effects of NMs is crucial for NM-tailored risk assessment. This in turn requires developers of NMs and for regulators to consider the most important parameters governing the properties, behavior and toxicity of NMs. As fate and effect studies are commonly performed in laboratory settings, mimicking to a varying extent realistic exposure conditions, it is important to be able to extrapolate results of fate and effect studies in synthetic media to realistic environmental conditions. This requires detailed understanding of the processes controlling the fate and behavior of NMs in terrestrial and aquatic media, as dependent on the composition of the medium. It is the aim of this contribution to provide background reading to the NM and media specific properties and processes that affect the fate and behavior of NMs in aquatic environments, focusing on the specific properties of NMs that modulate the interactions in the aquatic environment. A general introduction on the dominant fate determining processes of NMs is supplemented by case studies on specific classes of NMs: metal NMs, stable oxides, iron oxides, and carbon nanotubes. Based on the synthesis of the current knowledge base toward essential data and information needs, the review provides a description of the particle specific properties and the water characteristics that need monitoring in order to allow for future quantification and extrapolation of fate and behavior properties of NMs in freshwater compartments of varying composition.

1 October 2010 in Chemosphere
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JQJoris Quik
Joris Quik
Iseult LynchIseult Lynch
Iseult Lynch
KHKaren Van Hoecke
Karen Van Hoecke
CMCornelis J.H. Miermans
Cornelis J.H. Miermans
KSKarel A.C. De Schamphelaere
Karel A.C. De Schamphelaere
DMDik Van De Meent
Dik Van De Meent

7 January 2024 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BGBarouch Giechaskiel
Barouch Giechaskiel
Theodoros GrigoratosTheodoros Grigoratos
Theodoros Grigoratos
Marcel MathissenMarcel Mathissen
Marcel Mathissen
JQJoris Quik
Joris Quik
PTPeter Tromp
Peter Tromp
PDPanagiota Dilara
Panagiota Dilara
Tyre particles are generated by shear forces between the tread and the road or by volatilisation. Tyre abrasion (wear) contributes from one-third to half of microplastics unintentionally released into the environment. The major part ends up in the soil, a considerable amount is released into the aquatic environment, and a small percentage becomes airborne. Nevertheless, tyre abrasion contributes to 5–30% of road transport particulate matter (PM) emissions. This corresponds to approximately 5% of total ambient PM emissions. The particle mass size distribution peak at around 20 to 100 μm, with a second peak in the 2–10 μm range. A nucleation mode has been reported in some studies. The absolute abrasion levels depend on the tyre, vehicle, and road characteristics, but also on environmental conditions and driving style. Most tyre particle emission factors in the literature are based on data prior to the year 2000. We aggregated recent studies and found a mean abrasion of 110 mg/km per vehicle or 68 mg/km/t for passenger cars (based on approximately 300 measurements). Based on a limited number of studies, the PM10 emissions were 1.4–2.2 mg/km per tyre. On the other hand, the particle number emissions were in the order of 1010 #/km per tyre. The ratio of PM10 to total abrasion was found to be 2.5% on average. Finally, the ratio of PM2.5 to PM10 was calculated to be around 40%. Various mitigation measures for tyre particle pollution could be envisaged; the most direct is the limitation of the tyre abrasion rate, as proposed by the European Commission for the Euro 7 regulation. Other regulatory initiatives are also discussed.