Hamid Bokhary

Dr. Hamid Bokhary

University Medical Center, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah 24243, Saudi Arabia
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

7Years (2020-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HBHamid Bokhary
Hamid Bokhary
KPKrisna Nur Andriana Pangesti
Krisna Nur Andriana Pangesti
Harunor RashidHarunor Rashid
Harunor Rashid
MGMoataz Abd El Ghany
Moataz Abd El Ghany
GHGrant Hill-Cawthorne
Grant Hill-Cawthorne
There is increasing evidence that human movement facilitates the global spread of resistant bacteria and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) genes. We systematically reviewed the literature on the impact of travel on the dissemination of AMR. We searched the databases Medline, EMBASE and SCOPUS from database inception until the end of June 2019. Of the 3052 titles identified, 2253 articles passed the initial screening, of which 238 met the inclusion criteria. The studies covered 30,060 drug-resistant isolates from 26 identified bacterial species. Most were enteric, accounting for 65% of the identified species and 92% of all documented isolates. High-income countries were more likely to be recipient nations for AMR originating from middle- and low-income countries. The most common origin of travellers with resistant bacteria was Asia, covering 36% of the total isolates. Beta-lactams and quinolones were the most documented drug-resistant organisms, accounting for 35% and 31% of the overall drug resistance, respectively. Medical tourism was twice as likely to be associated with multidrug-resistant organisms than general travel. International travel is a vehicle for the transmission of antimicrobial resistance globally. Health systems should identify recent travellers to ensure that adequate precautions are taken.

13 October 2020 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MAMohammad Alfelali
Mohammad Alfelali
EHElizabeth A. Haworth
Elizabeth A. Haworth
Osamah BarasheedOsamah Barasheed
Osamah Barasheed
ABAl-Mamoon Badahdah
Al-Mamoon Badahdah
HBHamid Bokhary
Hamid Bokhary
Yasser H HadiYasser H Hadi
Yasser H Hadi
In this large-scale cluster-randomized controlled trial (cRCT) we sought to assess the effectiveness of facemasks against viral respiratory infections. Over three consecutive Hajj seasons (2013, 2014, 2015) pilgrims’ tents in Makkah were allocated to ‘facemask’ or ‘no facemask’ group. Fifty facemasks were offered to participants in intervention tents, to be worn over four days, and none were offered to participants in control tents. All participants recorded facemask use and respiratory symptoms in health diaries. Nasal swabs were collected from the symptomatic for virus detection by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. Clinical symptoms and laboratory results were analyzed by ‘intention- to-treat’ and ‘per-protocol’. A total of 7687 adult participants from 318 tents were randomized: 3864 from 149 tents to the intervention group, and 3823 from 169 tents to the control group. Participants were aged 18 to 95 (median 34, mean 37) years, with a male to female ratio of 1:1.2. Overall, respiratory viruses were detected in 277 of 650 (43%) nasal/pharyngeal swabs collected from symptomatic pilgrims. Common viruses were rhinovirus (35.1%), influenza (4.5%) and parainfluenza (1.7%). In the intervention arm, respectively 954 (24.7%) and 1842 (47.7%) participants used facemasks daily and intermittently, while in the control arm, respectively 546 (14.3%) and 1334 (34.9%) used facemasks daily and intermittently. By intention-to-treat analysis, facemask use did not seem to be effective against laboratory-confirmed viral respiratory infections (odds ratio [OR], 1.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.9 to 2.1, p = 0.18) nor against clinical respiratory infection (OR, 1.1; 95% CI, 0.9 to 1.4, p = 0.40). Similarly, in a per-protocol analysis, facemask use did not seem to be effective against laboratory-confirmed viral respiratory infections (OR 1.2, 95% CI 0.9–1.7, p = 0.26) nor against clinical respiratory infection (OR 1.3, 95% CI 1.0–1.8, p = 0.06). This trial was unable to provide conclusive evidence on facemask efficacy against viral respiratory infections most likely due to poor adherence to protocol.

SASara Alreeme
Sara Alreeme
HBHamid Bokhary
Hamid Bokhary
Adam T CraigAdam T Craig
Adam T Craig
Background: The Hajj is an annual religious mass gathering event held in Makkah, Saudi Arabia. With millions of participants from across the globe attending the Hajj, the risk of importation, transmission, and global spread of infectious diseases is high. The emergence of antimicrobial resistant (AMR) bacteria is of worldwide concern and the Hajj poses a serious risk to its dissemination. This review aims to synthesize published literature on AMR bacteria acquisition and transmission associated with the Hajj. Methods: We searched electronic databases to identify literature published between January 1990 and December 2021. The search strategy included medical subject headings and keyword terms related to AMR bacteria and the Hajj. Results: After screening 2214 search results, 51 studies were included in the analysis. The review found 6455 AMR bacteria transmissions related to the Hajj. Thirty predominantly enteric or respiratory disease-causing AMR bacterial species were reported with isolates identified in cases on five continents. Most were male, aged above 50 years and were diagnosed in Makkah. Most cases were identified through hospital-based research; few cases were detected in community or primary health care settings. Conclusions: This review provides a contemporary account of knowledge related to AMR transmission at the Hajj. It emphasizes the need for the enhancement of surveillance for AMR bacteria globally.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HBHamid Bokhary
Hamid Bokhary
Osamah BarasheedOsamah Barasheed
Osamah Barasheed
MGMoataz Abd El Ghany
Moataz Abd El Ghany
AKAmeneh Khatami
Ameneh Khatami
GHGrant Hill-Cawthorne
Grant Hill-Cawthorne
AKAmeneh Khatami
Ameneh Khatami
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a global public health issue. Upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs) are common illnesses during Hajj, for which antibiotics are often inappropriately prescribed. Hajj healthcare workers’ (HCW) knowledge, attitudes and perceptions (KAP) about AMR and antibiotic use for URTIs are not known. We conducted a survey among HCWs during Hajj to explore their KAP regarding antibiotic use for URTIs in pilgrims. Electronic or paper-based surveys were distributed to HCWs during the Hajj in 2016 and 2017. A total of 85 respondents aged 25 to 63 (median 40) years completed the surveys. Most participants were male (78.8%) and were physicians by profession (95.3%). Around 85% and 19% of respondents claimed to have heard about AMR and antimicrobial stewardship programs, respectively, among whom most had obtained their knowledge during their qualification. Implementation of URTI treatment guidelines was very low. In conclusion, HCWs at Hajj have significant knowledge gaps regarding AMR, often do not use standard clinical criteria to diagnose URTIs and display a tendency to prescribe antibiotics for URTIs.

25 April 2022 in Access Microbiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
HBHamid Bokhary
Hamid Bokhary
HTHajj Research Team
Hajj Research Team
OBOsamah Barasheed
Osamah Barasheed
HOHala B. Othman
Hala B. Othman
BSBurhanudin Saha
Burhanudin Saha
MGMoataz Abd El Ghany
Moataz Abd El Ghany
Hajj is associated with an increased risk of the transmission of infectious diseases including upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs). It can be a focal point for the emergence, persistence and dissemination of antimicrobial-resistant (AMR) bacteria. The overuse of antibiotics during Hajj can promote the development of antimicrobial resistance. Little information is known regarding the true appropriateness of prescribing antibiotics for treating URTIs during Hajj. Here we studied the rate, patterns and appropriateness of antibiotic prescription among a cohort of pilgrims who were treated for URTIs during the 2018 Hajj season. Adult pilgrims who sought medical services for URTIs [presenting with coryza, runny nose, nasal irritation, nasal congestion, cough, sore throat, headache or fever (even if subjective)] within the Holy sites were enrolled in this study and consented to provide swabs and medical information. A total of 121 pilgrims were enrolled, with the majority (60.3 %) originating from North African Arab countries. Most were male (89.3 %) with a median age of 45 years. Bacterial infections were detected in 7.3 % (n=9) of the URTI cases. The identified bacteria included Haemophilus influenzae (n=6, all resistant to ampicillin), Streptococcus pneumoniae (n=2), Staphylococcus aureus (n=1, resistant to oxacillin) and Moraxella catarrhalis (n=1, resistant to ampicillin and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole). The antibiotic prescription rate was 52.1%, most of which was amoxicillin (81 %). The data demonstrated that the proportion of appropriate practices in treating bacterial URTIs in this cohort was 45.5 %. This study highlights the need for implementing laboratory identification of the aetiological agents and related AMR profiles when treating URTIs in Hajj, rather than relying on clinical assessment alone.

1 October 2021 in Saudi Journal of Health Systems Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HBHamid Bokhary
Hamid Bokhary
Osamah BarasheedOsamah Barasheed
Osamah Barasheed
Monitoring medication and antibiotic prescription has been in the World Health Organization (WHO)’s agenda since the end of the 20th century [1]. As monitoring such prescriptions would provide indicators for irresponsible use of drugs, follow-up on related policy effects, and quality control. However, most guidance on the matter requires updating, due to improvements in health services in most parts of the world since then, such as the availability of hospital information systems (HIS) for developing countries [2]. The WHO suggested some indicators for investigating drug use within health facilities, in 1993 [3]. Now, nearly 3 decades away, this guidance was not updated as there are still no indicators that utilize the potential reporting by HIS. Moreover, the WHO considers HIS an important building block for any health system and has devised a manual for monitoring them, which is more recent than the previously mentioned guidance [4]. As an appropriate practice in investigating drug use in health facilities, the WHO should include the ability of HIS to assess the utilization patterns of medication and commodities in their HIS assessment tool [4]. However, not all localities have installed HIS within their facilities, such with some countries in the middle east [5]. Therefore, further studies are required to update indicators for medication and antibiotic use, considering the specificities of local health profiles or contexts, such as Hajj.