Ascensión Marcos

Prof. Dr. Ascensión Marcos

Immunonutrition Group, Department of Metabolism and Nutrition, Institute of Food Science, Technology and Nutrition (ICTAN), Spanish National Research Council (CSIC), C/Jose Antonio Novais, 28040 Madrid, Spain

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
15 June 2020 in Nutrients
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NUNOEMI REDONDO USEROS
NOEMI REDONDO USEROS
EREsther Nova Rebato
Esther Nova Rebato
NGNatalia González-Zancada
Natalia González-Zancada
LPLigia Esperanza Díaz Prieto
Ligia Esperanza Díaz Prieto
SGSonia Gómez-Martínez
Sonia Gómez-Martínez
Ascensión MarcosAscensión Marcos
Ascensión Marcos
It is widely known that a good balance and healthy function for bacteria groups in the colon are necessary to maintain homeostasis and preserve health. However, the lack of consensus on what defines a healthy gut microbiota and the multitude of factors that influence human gut microbiota composition complicate the development of appropriate dietary recommendations for our gut microbiota. Furthermore, the varied response to the intake of probiotics and prebiotics observed in healthy adults suggests the existence of potential inter- and intra-individual factors, which might account for gut microbiota changes to a greater extent than diet. The changing dietary habits worldwide involving consumption of processed foods containing artificial ingredients, such as sweeteners; the coincident rise in emotional disorders; and the worsening of other lifestyle habits, such as smoking habits, drug consumption, and sleep, can together contribute to gut dysbiosis and health impairment, as well as the development of chronic diseases. This review summarizes the current literature on the effects of specific dietary ingredients (probiotics, prebiotics, alcohol, refined sugars and sweeteners, fats) in the gut microbiota of healthy adults and the potential inter- and intra-individual factors involved, as well as the influence of other potential lifestyle factors that are dramatically increasing nowadays.

1 March 2016 in BMC Public Health
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
OTon behalf of the PREOBE team
on behalf of the PREOBE team
SBStaffan K Berglund
Staffan K Berglund
LGLuz Garcia-Valdes
Luz Garcia-Valdes
FTFrancisco J. Torres-Espínola
Francisco J. Torres-Espínola
MSMaria Teresa Segura
Maria Teresa Segura
Cristina CampoyCristina Campoy
Cristina Campoy
Maternal overweight, obesity, and gestational diabetes (GD) have been negatively associated with offspring development. Further knowledge regarding metabolic and nutritional alterations in these mother and their offspring are warranted. In an observational cohort study we included 331 pregnant women from Granada, Spain. The mothers were categorized into four groups according to BMI and their GD status; overweight (n:56), obese (n:64), GD (n:79), and healthy normal weight controls (n:132). We assessed maternal growth and nutritional biomarkers at 24 weeks (n = 269), 34 weeks (n = 310) and at delivery (n = 310) and the perinatal characteristics including cord blood biomarkers. Obese and GD mothers had significantly lower weight gain during pregnancy and infant birth weight, waist circumference, and placental weight were higher in the obese group, including a significantly increased prevalence of macrosomia. Except for differences in markers of glucose metabolism (glucose, HbA1c, insulin and uric acid) we found at some measures that overweight and/or obese mothers had lower levels of transferrin saturation, hemoglobin, Vitamin B12 and folate and higher levels of C-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, ferritin, and cortisol. GD mothers had similar differences in hemoglobin and C-reactive protein but higher levels of folate. The latter was seen also in cord blood. We identified several metabolic alterations in overweight, obese and GD mothers compared to controls. Together with the observed differences in infant anthropometrics, these may be important biomarkers in future research regarding the programming of health and disease in children. The trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov, identifier ( NCT01634464 ).

18 April 2022 in Nutrients
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SCSusana del Pozo de La Calle
Susana del Pozo de La Calle
SGSonia Gómez-Martínez
Sonia Gómez-Martínez
LPLigia Esperanza Díaz Prieto
Ligia Esperanza Díaz Prieto
EREsther Nova Rebato
Esther Nova Rebato
RURafael Urrialde
Rafael Urrialde
Ascensión MarcosAscensión Marcos
Ascensión Marcos
Artificial sweeteners are additives widely used in our diet. Although there is no consensus, current evidence indicates that sucralose and saccharin could influence the gut microbiota. The aim of this study was to analyze the existing scientific evidence on the effects of saccharin and sucralose consumption on gut microbiota in humans. Different databases were used with the following search terms: sweeteners, non-caloric-sweeteners, sucralose, splenda, saccharin, sugartwin, sweet’n low, microbiota, gut microbiota, humans, animal model, mice, rats, and/or in vitro studies. In vitro and animal model studies indicate a dose-dependent relationship between the intake of both sweeteners and gut microbiota affecting both diversity and composition. In humans, long-term study suggests the existence of a positive correlation between sweetener consumption and some bacterial groups; however, most short-term interventions with saccharin and sucralose, in amounts below the ADI, found no significant effect on those groups, but there seems to be a different basal microbiota-dependent response of metabolic markers. Although studies in vitro and in animal models seem to relate saccharin and sucralose consumption to changes in the gut microbiota, more long-term studies are needed in humans considering the basal microbiota of participants and their dietary and lifestyle habits in all population groups. Toxicological and basal gut microbiota effects must be included as relevant factors to evaluate food safety and nutritional consequences of non-calorie sweeteners. In humans, doses, duration of interventions, and number of subjects included in the studies are key factors to interpret the results.

5 October 2012 in International Journal of Behavioral Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Palma ChillónPalma Chillón
Palma Chillón
DMDavid Martínez-Gómez
David Martínez-Gómez
FOFrancisco B. Ortega
Francisco B. Ortega
Isaac J. Pérez-LópzIsaac J. Pérez-Lópz
Isaac J. Pérez-Lópz
LPLigia Esperanza Díaz Prieto
Ligia Esperanza Díaz Prieto
MDManuel Delgado-Fernández
Manuel Delgado-Fernández

10 July 2020 in Nutrients
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EREsther Nova Rebato
Esther Nova Rebato
NUNOEMI REDONDO USEROS
NOEMI REDONDO USEROS
RMRosa M. Martínez
Rosa M. Martínez
SGSonia Gómez-Martínez
Sonia Gómez-Martínez
LPLigia Esperanza Díaz Prieto
Ligia Esperanza Díaz Prieto
Ascensión MarcosAscensión Marcos
Ascensión Marcos
Moringa oleifera (MO) is a multipurpose plant consumed as food and known for its medicinal uses, among others. Leaves, seeds and pods are the main parts used as food or food supplements. Nutritionally rich and with a high polyphenol content in the form of phenolic acids, flavonoids and glucosinolates, MO has been shown to exert numerous in vitro activities and in vivo effects, including hypoglycemic activity. A systematic search was carried out in the PubMed database and reference lists on the effects of MO on glucose metabolism. Thirty-three animal studies and eight human studies were included. Water and organic solvent extracts of leaves and, secondly, seeds, have been extensively assayed in animal models, showing the hypoglycemic effect, both under acute conditions and in long-term administrations and also prevention of other metabolic changes and complications associated to the hyperglycemic status. In humans, clinical trials are scarce, with variable designs and testing mainly dry leaf powder alone or mixed with other foods or MO aqueous preparations. Although the reported results are encouraging, especially those from postprandial studies, more human studies are certainly needed with more stringent inclusion criteria and a sufficient number of diabetic or prediabetic subjects. Moreover, trying to quantify the bioactive substances administered with the experimental material tested would facilitate comparison between studies.

9 March 2021 in Nutrients
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Ascensión MarcosAscensión Marcos
Ascensión Marcos
Lluis Serra-MajemLluis Serra-Majem
Lluis Serra-Majem
CMCarmen Marin
Carmen Marin
VPVicente Pascual
Vicente Pascual
FTFrancisco Tinahones
Francisco Tinahones
Ramon EstruchRamon Estruch
Ramon Estruch
There is growing interest in the potential health-related effects of moderate alcohol consumption and, specifically, of beer. This review provides an assessment of beer-associated effects on cardiovascular and metabolic risk factors to identify a consumption level that can be considered “moderate”. We identified all prospective clinical studies and systematic reviews that evaluated the health effects of beer published between January 2007 and April 2020. Five of six selected studies found a protective effect of moderate alcohol drinking on cardiovascular disease (beer up to 385 g/week) vs. abstainers or occasional drinkers. Four out of five papers showed an association between moderate alcohol consumption (beer intake of 84 g alcohol/week) and decreased mortality risk. We concluded that moderate beer consumption of up to 16 g alcohol/day (1 drink/day) for women and 28 g/day (1–2 drinks/day) for men is associated with decreased incidence of cardiovascular disease and overall mortality, among other metabolic health benefits.