Luís Filipe Lages Martins

Dr. Luís Filipe Lages Martins

National Laboratory for Civil Engineering (LNEC), Av. do Brasil 101, 1700-066 Lisboa, Portugal
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

16Years (2011-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
4 July 2015 in International Journal of Thermophysics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Álvaro Silva RibeiroÁlvaro Silva Ribeiro
Álvaro Silva Ribeiro
JSJoão Alves Alves e Sousa
João Alves Alves e Sousa
MCMaurice Cox
Maurice Cox
AFAlistair Forbes
Alistair Forbes
LML. Cordeiro Matias
L. Cordeiro Matias
Luís Filipe Lages MartinsLuís Filipe Lages Martins
Luís Filipe Lages Martins

31 May 2011 in International Journal of Thermophysics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Luís Filipe Lages MartinsLuís Filipe Lages Martins
Luís Filipe Lages Martins
ARA. Silva Ribeiro
A. Silva Ribeiro
JSJoão Alves Alves e Sousa
João Alves Alves e Sousa
AFAlistair B. Forbes
Alistair B. Forbes

6 May 2024 in Metrology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EBElsa Batista
Elsa Batista
JSJoão Alves Alves e Sousa
João Alves Alves e Sousa
FSFernanda Saraiva
Fernanda Saraiva
ALAndré Lopes
André Lopes
Vania SilverioVania Silverio
Vania Silverio
Luís Filipe Lages MartinsLuís Filipe Lages Martins
Luís Filipe Lages Martins
Dimensional measurements are fundamental in microfluidic device manufacturing and performance. The main focus of this study is the measurement of the connection port sizes in microfluidic devices and components and, accordingly, the possible existence of fluid leaks determined using the flow rate error. The sizes associated with three different microfluidic systems were determined using laser interferometry and through an optical measuring instrument, with metrological traceability to national length standards. It was possible to infer the method with the greatest accuracy and lowest measurement uncertainty for characterizing this kind of system. In conclusion, the results of this work directly address the current lack of dimensions measuring methods of microfluidic components by providing a comprehensive comparison of different protocols, ultimately suggesting a preferred option for immediate application within the microfluidic industry.

1 April 2014 in International Journal of Thermophysics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Luís Filipe Lages MartinsLuís Filipe Lages Martins
Luís Filipe Lages Martins
JRJosé Manuel Rebordão
José Manuel Rebordão
Álvaro Silva RibeiroÁlvaro Silva Ribeiro
Álvaro Silva Ribeiro

31 December 2024 in Thin-Walled Structures
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Joao Alfredo De LazzariJoao Alfredo De Lazzari
Joao Alfredo De Lazzari
André Rafael Dias MartinsAndré Rafael Dias Martins
André Rafael Dias Martins
JCJ.R. Correia
J.R. Correia
Luís Filipe Lages MartinsLuís Filipe Lages Martins
Luís Filipe Lages Martins
Álvaro Silva RibeiroÁlvaro Silva Ribeiro
Álvaro Silva Ribeiro
NSNuno Silvestre
Nuno Silvestre

1 August 2018 in Journal of Physics: Conference Series
Verified
Conference Paper
Open access
PDF file
EBElsa Batista
Elsa Batista
JSJoão Alves Alves e Sousa
João Alves Alves e Sousa
ÁRÁ Ribeiro
Á Ribeiro
Luís Filipe Lages MartinsLuís Filipe Lages Martins
Luís Filipe Lages Martins
MPM Pereira
M Pereira
HNH. Navas
H. Navas
Nowadays, infusion pumps such as syringe pumps and peristaltic pumps are commonly used for drug delivery, in situations where the delivery dose has stringent limits and high risk impact. In order to ensure the metrological traceability of these flow and volume measuring equipment it is necessary to use suitable calibration methods and standards. One of the methods typically used in hospitals is relying on an Infusion Device Analyser (IDA). This is a secondary method, and consists on comparing directly the flow generated by the infusion pump with the IDA. The IDA can be calibrated by gravimetric or by the use of a precision syringe pump. In this paper the results of the two calibration methods are compared. Moreover, a new calibration method using a Coriolis meter is evaluated. The uncertainty budgets of the three methods are described in detail.