Ajmer Brar

Dr. Ajmer Brar


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

35Years (1992-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications

10 May 2021 in Plants
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RKRamanpreet Kaur
Ramanpreet Kaur
SKSimerjeet Kaur
Simerjeet Kaur
JDJasdev Singh Deol
Jasdev Singh Deol
RSRajni Sharma
Rajni Sharma
TKTarundeep Kaur
Tarundeep Kaur
OCOm Parkash Choudhary
Om Parkash Choudhary
The rice–wheat cropping system (RWCS) has substantially contributed in making India self-sufficient in food grain production; however, rice residue management is of great concern, threatening the sustainability of this system. Rice residue is invariably disposed of by farmers through open burning. In addition to environmental pollution, residue burning of rice also leads to loss of soil nutrients. One of the alternatives to overcome these problems and sustain the RWCS is managing the rice residues in the field itself. Rice residue retention has variable effects on agricultural pests (namely, weeds, insect pests, diseases, and rodents) in the RWCS. High weed infestation in the RWCS results in high consumption of herbicides, which leads to several ecological problems and evolution of herbicide resistance. The shift from intensive tillage to conservation tillage causes major changes in weed dynamics and herbicide efficacy. Incorporation of rice residue reduces weed density and helps in improving soil physical, chemical, and biological properties. Rice residue retention on the surface or mulching reduces weed density and the biomass of both grass and broadleaf weeds in wheat crop as compared to its removal. Long-term field studies involving the use of rice residue as a component of integrated weed management strategies are needed to be done in the RWCS.

18 June 2022 in Journal of Cleaner Production
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Kulvir SinghKulvir Singh
Kulvir Singh
SMSUDHIR KUMAR MISHRA
SUDHIR KUMAR MISHRA
MSMANPREET SINGH
MANPREET SINGH
KSKuldeep Singh
Kuldeep Singh
ABAjmer Brar
Ajmer Brar

9 June 2018 in Paddy and Water Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ABAjmer Brar
Ajmer Brar
GBG. S. Buttar
G. S. Buttar
RSRajni Sharma
Rajni Sharma

6 June 2019 in Potato Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ABAjmer Brar
Ajmer Brar
GBG. S. Buttar
G. S. Buttar
HTH. S. Thind
H. S. Thind
KSK. B. Singh
K. B. Singh

1 February 1992 in The Journal of Agricultural Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DSDhanwinder Singh
Dhanwinder Singh
MBM. S. Brar
M. S. Brar
ABAjmer Brar
Ajmer Brar
SUMMARY: Potassium concentrations in various plant parts of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) at different growth stages were determined in field experiments in Punjab, India, in 1987, for plots fertilized at sowing and flowering, and these were compared with the final seed cotton yield. The optimum time of sampling for predicting relative yield depends on the time of K fertilizer application: if applied at sowing, plants should be sampled before the peak flowering stage (70 days after sowing, DAS); if applied at flowering (50 DAS), plants should be sampled 90–115 DAS. Critical K concentrations (% K. in dry matter) in the plant parts measured at different growth stages were 3·26 in the petioles of the third leaf from the top at flower initiation; 0·69 and 0·90 in blades and petioles of a lower leaf (first or second healthy leaf from the bottom of plant) respectively, and 2·60 in the petioles of the third leaf (young, fully mature leaf from the top of the plant) at peak flowering stage; 0·85 in blades of the third leaf, 0·53 and 0·50 in blades and petioles of a lower leaf, respectively, at the boll development stage; 0·70 and 2·85 in blades and petioles of the third leaf and 0·68 in petioles of a lower leaf at boll opening stage.