Luisa Lanfrancone

Dr. Luisa Lanfrancone

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

45Years (1982-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
18 November 1999 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
EMEnrica Migliaccio
Enrica Migliaccio
MGMarco Giorgio
Marco Giorgio
SMSimonetta Mele
Simonetta Mele
GPGiuliana Pelicci
Giuliana Pelicci
PRPaolo Reboldi
Paolo Reboldi
PPPier Giuseppe Pelicci
Pier Giuseppe Pelicci

1 July 1992 in Cell
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GPGiuliana Pelicci
Giuliana Pelicci
LLLuisa Lanfrancone
Luisa Lanfrancone
FGFrancesco Grignani
Francesco Grignani
JMJane McGlade
Jane McGlade
FCFederica Cavallo
Federica Cavallo
PPPier Giuseppe Pelicci
Pier Giuseppe Pelicci

20 January 2017 in Nature Reviews Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ABAnnette T Byrne
Annette T Byrne
DADenis G. Alférez
Denis G. Alférez
FAFrédéric Amant
Frédéric Amant
DADaniela Annibali
Daniela Annibali
Joaquín ArribasJoaquín Arribas
Joaquín Arribas
LTLivio Trusolino
Livio Trusolino
Patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) have emerged as an important platform to elucidate new treatments and biomarkers in oncology. PDX models are used to address clinically relevant questions, including the contribution of tumour heterogeneity to therapeutic responsiveness, the patterns of cancer evolutionary dynamics during tumour progression and under drug pressure, and the mechanisms of resistance to treatment. The ability of PDX models to predict clinical outcomes is being improved through mouse humanization strategies and the implementation of co-clinical trials, within which patients and PDXs reciprocally inform therapeutic decisions. This Opinion article discusses aspects of PDX modelling that are relevant to these questions and highlights the merits of shared PDX resources to advance cancer medicine from the perspective of EurOPDX, an international initiative devoted to PDX-based research.

15 October 1994 in Journal of Cell Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
FRF Re
F Re
AZAdriana Zanetti
Adriana Zanetti
MSM Sironi
M Sironi
NPN Polentarutti
N Polentarutti
LLLuisa Lanfrancone
Luisa Lanfrancone
FCF Colotta
F Colotta
When cultivated on substrates that prevent cell adhesion (the polymer polyhydroxyethylmethacrylate, bovine serum albumin, and Teflon), human endothelial cells (EC) rapidly lost viability with a half-life of approximately 10 h. Dying EC showed the morphological and biochemical characteristics of apoptosis. The apoptotic process of suspended EC was delayed by the protein synthesis inhibitor cycloheximide. To obtain information as to the mechanism involved in the apoptosis of suspended EC, we investigated whether adhesion to matrix proteins or integrin occupancy in EC retaining a round shape may affect EC suicide. EC bound to low coating concentration of either fibronectin or vitronectin, retaining a round shape and failing to organize actin microfilaments, underwent to rapid cell death; by contrast, cells on high substrate concentrations became flattened, showed actin microfilament organization, and retained viability. Addition of saturating amounts of soluble vitronectin to suspended round-shaped EC did not reduce the process of apoptosis. Finally, when suspended EC bound Gly-Arg-Gly-Asp-Ser-coated microbeads (approximately 10 microbeads/cell), yet retaining a round shape, the apoptotic process was not affected. Oncogene-transformed EC in suspension were less susceptible to cell death and apoptosis than normal EC. Overall, these data indicate that cell attachment to matrix or integrin binding per se is not sufficient for maintaining cell viability, and that cells need to undergo some minimal degree of shape change to survive. Modulation of interaction with the extracellular matrix can, therefore, be an important target for the control of angiogenesis.

28 May 2002 in Oncogene
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MTMirella Trinei
Mirella Trinei
MGMarco Giorgio
Marco Giorgio
ACAngelo Cicalese
Angelo Cicalese
SBSara Barozzi
Sara Barozzi
AVAndrea Ventura
Andrea Ventura
PPPier Giuseppe Pelicci
Pier Giuseppe Pelicci

15 February 1997 in The EMBO Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EMEnrica Migliaccio
Enrica Migliaccio
SMSimonetta Mele
Simonetta Mele
ASAnna E. Salcini
Anna E. Salcini
GPGiuliana Pelicci
Giuliana Pelicci
KLKa‐Man Venus Lai
Ka‐Man Venus Lai
PPPier Giuseppe Pelicci
Pier Giuseppe Pelicci
Shc proteins are targets of activated tyrosine kinases and are implicated in the transmission of activation signals to Ras. The p46shc and p52shc isoforms share a C‐terminal SH2 domain, a proline‐ and glycine‐rich region (collagen homologous region 1; CH1) and a N‐terminal PTB domain. We have isolated cDNAs encoding for a third Shc isoform, p66shc. The predicted amino acid sequence of p66shc overlaps that of p52shc and contains a unique N‐terminal region which is also rich in glycines and prolines (CH2). p52shc/p46shc is found in every cell type with invariant reciprocal relationship, whereas p66shc expression varies from cell type to cell type. p66shc differs from p52shc/p46shc in its inability to transform mouse fibroblasts in vitro . Like p52shc/p46shc, p66shc is tyrosine‐phosphorylated upon epidermal growth factor (EGF) stimulation, binds to activated EGF receptors (EGFRs) and forms stable complexes with Grb2. However, unlike p52shc/p46shc it does not increase EGF activation of MAP kinases, but inhibits fos promoter activation. The isolated CH2 domain retains the inhibitory effect of p66shc on the fos promoter. p52shc/p46shc and p66shc, therefore, appear to exert different effects on the EGFR‐MAP kinase and other signalling pathways that control fos promoter activity. Regulation of p66shc expression might, therefore, influence the cellular response to growth factors.