With the increasing penetration of distributed photovoltaic-energy storage system (PV-ESS) access distribution networks, the safe and stable operation of the system has brought a huge impact, in which the voltage regulation of PV-ESS distribution networks is more prominent. This paper comprehensively reviews the voltage over-run mechanism in the PV-ESS distribution network and combs through the current mainstream voltage regulation strategies, of which two strategies of direct voltage regulation and current optimization are summarized. At the same time, this paper discusses the advantages and limitations of centralized, distributed, multi-timescale, voltage-reactive joint optimization and other regulation methods and focuses on the analysis of heuristic algorithms and algorithms based on deep reinforcement learning in the voltage regulation of the relevant research progress. Finally, this paper points out the main challenges currently facing voltage regulation in PV-ESS distribution networks, including cluster dynamic partitioning technologies, multi-timescale control of hybrid voltage regulation devices, and synergistic problems of demand-side resources, such as electric vehicle participation in voltage regulation, etc., and gives an outlook on future research directions. The aim of this paper is to provide a theoretical basis and practical guidance for voltage regulation of PV-ESS distribution networks and to promote the intelligent construction and sustainable development of power grids.

The direct current circuit breakers are considered a promising option to protect the transmission line against commonly appearing line-to-ground fault. However, the challenges of losses in the nonoperational stage, escalation of response against fault current, and large fault current handling capability remain the debatable issues for direct current circuit breakers. This paper introduces a novel topology of the hybrid circuit breaker with fault-current-limiting characteristics, which contains three branches: the main branch, fault-current-limiting branch, and energy absorption branch. The main branch includes a mechanical switch, breaker impedance, and bidirectional power electronics switches. In the fault-current-limiting branch, a fault-current-limiting circuit is introduced which contains n numbers of bidirectional switches and current-limiting inductors, which are connected in series to make the design modular in nature. During the normal working stage, the current flows through the main branch of the breaker. Once a fault in the system is confirmed, the fault current is transferred to the fault-current-limiting branch. At this stage, the intensity of the fault current is reduced significantly using the fault-current-limiting circuit, and finally, the residual current is shifted to the energy absorption branch. The working principle, design considerations, and parametric analysis concerning the design of hybrid circuit breakers are incorporated in this paper. The performance of the proposed breaker is evaluated using a three-terminal voltage-source converter-based high-voltage direct current transmission network; for this purpose, a PSCAD/EMTDC simulation tool is used. The performance of the proposed breaker is also compared with other topologies. The comparative analysis shows that the proposed breaker is a good alternative considering high fault current interruption requirements, response time against fault current, and power losses.

A conventional hybrid circuit breaker (HCB) is used to protect a voltage source converter-based high voltage direct current transmission system (VSC-HVDC) from a short circuit fault. With the increased converter capacity, the DC protection equipment also requires a regular upgrade. This paper adopts a novel type of HCB with a fault current limiter circuit (FCLC), and focuses on the responses of voltage and current during DC faults, which are associated with parameter selection. PSCAD/EMTDC based simulation of a three-terminal VSC-HVDC system confirms the effectiveness and value of HCB with FCLC, by using an equivalent circuit modelling approach. Laboratory experimental tests validate the simulation results. The peak fault current is reduced according to the current limiting inductor (CLI) increase, and can be isolated more quickly. By adopting parallel metal oxide arrester (MOA) with the main branch of HCB, voltage stresses across the breaker components decrease during transient and continuous operation, and less energy needs to be dissipated by the MOA. The remnant current for all cases is transmitted to power dissipating resistor (PDR) in the final stage, and the fault current is reduced to the lowest possible value. When the current from the main branch is transferred to the FCLC branch, transient voltage spikes occur, while smaller PDR is required to absorb current in the final stage.