Chih-Hung Hsu

Chih-Hung Hsu


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

34Years (1993-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 November 2019 in The Lancet Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KKKen Kato
Ken Kato
BCByoung Chul Cho
Byoung Chul Cho
MTMasanobu Takahashi
Masanobu Takahashi
MOMorihito Okada
Morihito Okada
CLChen-Yuan Lin
Chen-Yuan Lin
YKYuko Kitagawa
Yuko Kitagawa

1 October 2013 in Journal of Clinical Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PJPhilip J. Johnson
Philip J. Johnson
SQShukui Qin
Shukui Qin
JPJoong-Won Park
Joong-Won Park
RPRonnie T.P. Poon
Ronnie T.P. Poon
JRJean-Luc Raoul
Jean-Luc Raoul
LCLi-Tzong Chen
Li-Tzong Chen
Purpose: Brivanib is a dual inhibitor of vascular-endothelial growth factor and fibroblast growth factor receptors that are implicated in the pathogenesis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Our multinational, randomized, double-blind, phase III trial compared brivanib with sorafenib as first-line treatment for HCC. Patients and Methods: Advanced HCC patients who had no prior systemic therapy were randomly assigned (ratio, 1:1) to receive sorafenib 400 mg twice daily orally (n = 578) or brivanib 800 mg once daily orally (n = 577). Primary end point was overall survival (OS). Secondary end points included time to progression (TTP), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) based on modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST), and safety. Results: The primary end point of OS noninferiority for brivanib versus sorafenib in the per-protocol population (n = 1,150) was not met (hazard ratio [HR], 1.06; 95.8% CI, 0.93 to 1.22), based on the prespecified margin (upper CI limit for HR ≤ 1.08). Median OS was 9.9 months for sorafenib and 9.5 months for brivanib. TTP, ORR, and DCR were similar between the study arms. Most frequent grade 3/4 adverse events for sorafenib and brivanib were hyponatremia (9% and 23%, respectively), AST elevation (17% and 14%), fatigue (7% and 15%), hand-foot-skin reaction (15% and 2%), and hypertension (5% and 13%). Discontinuation as a result of adverse events was 33% for sorafenib and 43% for brivanib; rates for dose reduction were 50% and 49%, respectively. Conclusion: Our study did not meet its primary end point of OS noninferiority for brivanib versus sorafenib. However, both agents had similar antitumor activity, based on secondary efficacy end points. Brivanib had an acceptable safety profile, but was less well-tolerated than sorafenib.

20 November 2001
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LCLi-Tzong Chen
Li-Tzong Chen
CHChih-Hung Hsu
Chih-Hung Hsu
JLJ K Lin
J K Lin
MHM M Hsu
M M Hsu
YHYunn-fang Ho
Yunn-fang Ho
CHC Y Hsieh
C Y Hsieh

1 February 2020 in Journal of Hepatology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LCLi-Tzong Chen
Li-Tzong Chen
CHChih-Hung Hsu
Chih-Hung Hsu
SCStephen L. Chan
Stephen L. Chan
SCSu-Pin Choo
Su-Pin Choo
MKMasatoshi Kudo
Masatoshi Kudo

1 January 2007
Verified
Book Chapter
Closed access
PDF file
CHChih-Hung Hsu
Chih-Hung Hsu
LCLi-Tzong Chen
Li-Tzong Chen

1 April 2011 in The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KCKuen-Feng Chen
Kuen-Feng Chen
HCHui-Ling Chen
Hui-Ling Chen
WTWei-Tien Tai
Wei-Tien Tai
WFWen-Chi Feng
Wen-Chi Feng
CHChih-Hung Hsu
Chih-Hung Hsu
LCLi-Tzong Chen
Li-Tzong Chen
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common potentially lethal human malignancies worldwide. Sorafenib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor, was recently approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration for HCC. In this study, we established two sorafenib-resistant HCC cell lines from Huh7, a human HCC cell line, by long-term exposure of cells to sorafenib. Sorafenib induced significant apoptosis in Huh7 cells; however, Huh7-R1 and Huh7-R2 showed significant resistance to sorafenib-induced apoptosis at the clinical relevant concentrations (up to 10 μM). Thorough comparisons of the molecular changes between Huh7 and resistant cells showed that the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/Akt signaling pathway played a significant role in mediating acquired resistance to sorafenib in Huh7-R1 and Huh7-R2 cells. Phospho-Akt and p85 (a regulatory subunit of PI3K) were up-regulated, whereas tumor suppressor phosphatase and tensin homolog were down-regulated in these resistant cells. In addition, ectopic expression of constitutive Akt in Huh7 demonstrated similar resistance to sorafenib. The knockdown of Akt by RNA interference reversed resistance to sorafenib in Huh7-R1 cells, indicating the importance of Akt in drug sensitivity. Furthermore, the combination of 8-[4-(1-aminocyclobutyl)phenyl]-9-phenyl-1,2,4-triazolo[3,4-f][1,6]naphthyridin-3(2H)-one dihydrochloride (MK-2206), a novel allosteric Akt inhibitor, and sorafenib restored the sensitivity of resistant cells to sorafenib-induced apoptosis. In conclusion, activation of PI3K/Akt signaling pathway mediates acquired resistance to sorafenib in HCC, and the combination of sorafenib and MK-2206, an Akt inhibitor, overcomes the resistance at clinical achievable concentrations.