Paolo Magni

Dr. Paolo Magni

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

29Years (1998-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2005 in Marine Ecology Progress Series
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JHJ. Hyland
J. Hyland
LBL. Balthis
L. Balthis
IKIoannis Karakassis
Ioannis Karakassis
PMPaolo Magni
Paolo Magni
APA. Petrov
A. Petrov
RWR. Warwick
R. Warwick

24 September 2015 in Microchimica Acta
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JBJohn Barton
John Barton
MGMaría Begoña González García
María Begoña González García
DSDavid Hernández Santos
David Hernández Santos
PFPablo Fanjul-Bolado
Pablo Fanjul-Bolado
Alberto RibottiAlberto Ribotti
Alberto Ribotti
PMPaolo Magni
Paolo Magni

1 December 2010 in Marine Pollution Bulletin
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GHGert Van Hoey
Gert Van Hoey
BABorja Angel
Borja Angel
SBSilvana Birchenough
Silvana Birchenough
LBLene Buhl-Mortensen
Lene Buhl-Mortensen
SDSteven Degraer
Steven Degraer
Michael Lothar ZettlerMichael Lothar Zettler
Michael Lothar Zettler

6 December 2017 in Global Change Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TGTamar Guy-Haim
Tamar Guy-Haim
DLDevin A. Lyons
Devin A. Lyons
Jonne KottaJonne Kotta
Jonne Kotta
HOHenn Ojaveer
Henn Ojaveer
AQAna M. Queirós
Ana M. Queirós
Gil RilovGil Rilov
Gil Rilov
Invasive ecosystem engineers (IEE) are potentially one of the most influential types of biological invaders. They are expected to have extensive ecological impacts by altering the physical–chemical structure of ecosystems, thereby changing the rules of existence for a broad range of resident biota. To test the generality of this expectation, we used a global systematic review and meta‐analysis to examine IEE effects on the abundance of individual species and communities, biodiversity (using several indices) and ecosystem functions, focusing on marine and estuarine environments. We found that IEE had a significant effect (positive and negative) in most studies testing impacts on individual species, but the overall (cumulative) effect size was small and negative. Many individual studies showed strong IEE effects on community abundance and diversity, but the direction of effects was variable, leading to statistically non‐significant overall effects in most categories. In contrast, there was a strong overall effect on most ecosystem functions we examined. IEE negatively affected metabolic functions and primary production, but positively affected nutrient flux, sedimentation and decomposition. We use the results to develop a conceptual model by highlighting pathways whereby IEE impact communities and ecosystem functions, and identify several sources of research bias in the IEE‐related invasion literature. Only a few of the studies simultaneously quantified IEE effects on community/diversity and ecosystem functions. Therefore, understanding how IEE may alter biodiversity–ecosystem function relationships should be a primary focus of future studies of invasion biology. Moreover, the clear effects of IEE on ecosystem functions detected in our study suggest that scientists and environmental managers ought to examine how the effects of IEE might be manifested in the services that marine ecosystems provide to humans.

1 June 2004 in Chemistry and Ecology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Giovanni De FalcoGiovanni De Falco
Giovanni De Falco
PMPaolo Magni
Paolo Magni
LTL. M. H. Teräsvuori
L. M. H. Teräsvuori
GMG. Matteucci
G. Matteucci
The aim of this work was to investigate the spatial variability of sediment bulk properties in the surface sediments as well as down-core trends, and to assess the relationship between sediment distribution and levels of total organic carbon (TOC), in the Cabras lagoon, Sardinia. Grain size distributions and TOC contents were measured in the surface sediments (0–2 cm horizon) in a grid of 31 stations. Vertical profiles along the 0–24 cm depth horizon were also measured in three stations. In the superficial horizon, TOC content was very high, up to 43 mg g−1, with a mean of 33 mg g−1. Core profiles showed a marked reduction of TOC content with depth to ∼20–25 mg g−1 and a concomitant shift in particles size towards a sandier composition (mud content decreasing from 95–100% to 70–85%) at 3–7 cm core depth. Total organic carbon contents in the uppermost layers were associated with the grain size fraction <8 µm. The results suggest that a major change in the sedimentary regime of the lagoon, associated with internal trapping and re-distribution of organic C-bounding fine particles, has been occurring in the last few decades. The cause would appear to be the construction of a dam at the lagoon mouth rising up to the high tide level in order to maintain a constant lagoonal water level.

16 October 2013 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Michael Lothar ZettlerMichael Lothar Zettler
Michael Lothar Zettler
CPC. Edward Proffitt
C. Edward Proffitt
ADAlexander Darr
Alexander Darr
SDSteven Degraer
Steven Degraer
LDLisa Devriese
Lisa Devriese
TYTom Ysebaert
Tom Ysebaert
The use of static indicator species, in which species are expected to have a similar sensitivity or tolerance to either natural or human-induced stressors, does not account for possible shifts in tolerance along natural environmental gradients and between biogeographic regions. Their indicative value may therefore be considered at least questionable. In this paper we demonstrate how species responses (i.e. abundance) to changes in sediment grain size and organic matter (OM) alter along a salinity gradient and conclude with a plea for prudency when interpreting static indicator-based quality indices. Six model species (three polychaetes, one amphipod and two bivalves) from the North Sea, Baltic Sea and the Mediterranean Sea region were selected. Our study demonstrated that there were no generic relationships between environment and biota and half of the studied species showed different responses in different seas. Consequently, the following points have to be carefully considered when applying static indicator-based quality indices: (1) species tolerances and preferences may change along environmental gradients and between different biogeographic regions, (2) as environment modifies species autecology, there is a need to adjust indicator species lists along major environmental gradients and (3) there is a risk of including sibling or cryptic species in calculating the index value of a species.