Michael Lothar Zettler

Dr. Michael Lothar Zettler

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

33Years (1994-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
24 July 2018 in Global Ecology and Biogeography
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MDMaria Dornelas
Maria Dornelas
LALaura H. Antão
Laura H. Antão
FMFaye Moyes
Faye Moyes
ABAmanda E. Bates
Amanda E. Bates
AMAnne Magurran
Anne Magurran
Michael Lothar ZettlerMichael Lothar Zettler
Michael Lothar Zettler
Motivation: The BioTIME database contains raw data on species identities and abundances in ecological assemblages through time. These data enable users to calculate temporal trends in biodiversity within and amongst assemblages using a broad range of metrics. BioTIME is being developed as a community‐led open‐source database of biodiversity time series. Our goal is to accelerate and facilitate quantitative analysis of temporal patterns of biodiversity in the Anthropocene.Main types of variables included: The database contains 8,777,413 species abundance records, from assemblages consistently sampled for a minimum of 2 years, which need not necessarily be consecutive. In addition, the database contains metadata relating to sampling methodology and contextual information about each record.Spatial location and grain: BioTIME is a global database of 547,161 unique sampling locations spanning the marine, freshwater and terrestrial realms. Grain size varies across datasets from 0.0000000158 km2(158 cm2) to 100 km2(1,000,000,000,000 cm2).Time period and grain: BioTIME records span from 1874 to 2016. The minimal temporal grain across all datasets in BioTIME is a year.Major taxa and level of measurement: BioTIME includes data from 44,440 species across the plant and animal kingdoms, ranging from plants, plankton and terrestrial invertebrates to small and large vertebrates.Software format: .csv and .SQL.

1 September 2010 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HOHenn Ojaveer
Henn Ojaveer
AJAndres Jaanus
Andres Jaanus
BMBrian MacKenzie
Brian MacKenzie
GMGeorg Martin
Georg Martin
SOSergej Olenin
Sergej Olenin
AZAnastasija Zaiko
Anastasija Zaiko
The brackish Baltic Sea hosts species of various origins and environmental tolerances. These immigrated to the sea 10,000 to 15,000 years ago or have been introduced to the area over the relatively recent history of the system. The Baltic Sea has only one known endemic species. While information on some abiotic parameters extends back as long as five centuries and first quantitative snapshot data on biota (on exploited fish populations) originate generally from the same time, international coordination of research began in the early twentieth century. Continuous, annual Baltic Sea-wide long-term datasets on several organism groups (plankton, benthos, fish) are generally available since the mid-1950s. Based on a variety of available data sources (published papers, reports, grey literature, unpublished data), the Baltic Sea, incl. Kattegat, hosts altogether at least 6,065 species, including at least 1,700 phytoplankton, 442 phytobenthos, at least 1,199 zooplankton, at least 569 meiozoobenthos, 1,476 macrozoobenthos, at least 380 vertebrate parasites, about 200 fish, 3 seal, and 83 bird species. In general, but not in all organism groups, high sub-regional total species richness is associated with elevated salinity. Although in comparison with fully marine areas the Baltic Sea supports fewer species, several facets of the system's diversity remain underexplored to this day, such as micro-organisms, foraminiferans, meiobenthos and parasites. In the future, climate change and its interactions with multiple anthropogenic forcings are likely to have major impacts on the Baltic biodiversity.

1 December 2010 in Marine Pollution Bulletin
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GHGert Van Hoey
Gert Van Hoey
BABorja Angel
Borja Angel
SBSilvana Birchenough
Silvana Birchenough
LBLene Buhl-Mortensen
Lene Buhl-Mortensen
SDSteven Degraer
Steven Degraer
Michael Lothar ZettlerMichael Lothar Zettler
Michael Lothar Zettler

19 June 2014 in ICES Journal of Marine Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HRHenning Reiss
Henning Reiss
SBSilvana Birchenough
Silvana Birchenough
BABorja Angel
Borja Angel
LBLene Buhl-Mortensen
Lene Buhl-Mortensen
JCJohan Craeymeersch
Johan Craeymeersch
SDSteven Degraer
Steven Degraer
Marine benthic ecosystems are difficult to monitor and assess, which is in contrast to modern ecosystem-based management requiring detailed information at all important ecological and anthropogenic impact levels. Ecosystem management needs to ensure a sustainable exploitation of marine resources as well as the protection of sensitive habitats, taking account of potential multiple-use conflicts and impacts over large spatial scales. The urgent need for large-scale spatial data on benthic species and communities resulted in an increasing application of distribution modelling (DM). The use of DM techniques enables to employ full spatial coverage data of environmental variables to predict benthic spatial distribution patterns. Especially, statistical DMs have opened new possibilities for ecosystem management applications, since they are straightforward and the outputs are easy to interpret and communicate. Mechanistic modelling techniques, targeting the fundamental niche of species, and Bayesian belief networks are the most promising to further improve DM performance in the marine realm. There are many actual and potential management applications of DMs in the marine benthic environment, these are (i) early warning systems for species invasion and pest control, (ii) to assess distribution probabilities of species to be protected, (iii) uses in monitoring design and spatial management frameworks (e.g. MPA designations), and (iv) establishing long-term ecosystem management measures (accounting for future climate-driven changes in the ecosystem). It is important to acknowledge also the limitations associated with DM applications in a marine management context as well as considering new areas for future DM developments. The knowledge of explanatory variables, for example, setting the basis for DM, will continue to be further developed: this includes both the abiotic (natural and anthropogenic) and the more pressing biotic (e.g. species interactions) aspects of the ecosystem. While the response variables on the other hand are often focused on species presence and some work undertaken on species abundances, it is equally important to consider, e.g. biological traits or benthic ecosystem functions in DM applications. Tools such as DMs are suitable to forecast the possible effects of climate change on benthic species distribution patterns and hence could help to steer present-day ecosystem management.

1 January 2007 in Marine Pollution Bulletin
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Michael Lothar ZettlerMichael Lothar Zettler
Michael Lothar Zettler
DSDoris Schiedek
Doris Schiedek
BBBernd Bobertz
Bernd Bobertz

20 September 2013 in Helgoland Marine Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Michael Lothar ZettlerMichael Lothar Zettler
Michael Lothar Zettler
AKAnna Karlsson
Anna Karlsson
TKTytti Kontula
Tytti Kontula
PGPiotr Gruszka
Piotr Gruszka
ALAri O. Laine
Ari O. Laine
JHJannica Haldin
Jannica Haldin