Olga Shamova

Dr. Olga Shamova

General Pathology and Pathophysiology, Institute of Experimental Medicine, Saint Petersburg, Sankt-Peterburg, Russia
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

39Years (1988-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
26 July 1993 in FEBS Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
VKVladimir N. Kokryakov
Vladimir N. Kokryakov
SHSylvia S.L. Harwig
Sylvia S.L. Harwig
EPElena A. Panyutich
Elena A. Panyutich
ASAndrei A. Shevchenko
Andrei A. Shevchenko
GAGalina M. Aleshina
Galina M. Aleshina
RLRobert I. Lehrer
Robert I. Lehrer

30 April 2019 in Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MZMaria Zharkova
Maria Zharkova
DODmitriy S. Orlov
Dmitriy S. Orlov
Olga Yu. GolubevaOlga Yu. Golubeva
Olga Yu. Golubeva
OCOleg B. Chakchir
Oleg B. Chakchir
IEIgor Eliseev
Igor Eliseev
Olga ShamovaOlga Shamova
Olga Shamova
Rapidly growing resistance of pathogenic bacteria to conventional antibiotics leads to inefficiency of traditional approaches of countering infections and determines the urgent need for a search of fundamentally new anti-infective drugs. Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) of the innate immune system are promising candidates for a role of such novel antibiotics. However, some cytotoxicity of AMPs toward host cells limits their active implementation in medicine and forces attempts to design numerous structural analogs of the peptides with optimized properties. An alternative route for the successful AMPs introduction may be their usage in combination with conventional antibiotics. Synergistic antibacterial effects have been reported for a number of such combinations, however, the molecular mechanisms of the synergy remain poorly understood and little is known whether AMPs cytotoxicy for the host cells increases upon their application with antibiotics. Our study is directed to examination of a combined action of natural AMPs with different structure and mode of action (porcine protegrin 1, caprine bactenecin ChBac3.4, human alpha- and beta-defensins (HNP-1, HNP-4, hBD-2, hBD-3), human cathelicidin LL-37), and egg white lysozyme with varied antibiotic agents (gentamicin, ofloxacin, oxacillin, rifampicin, polymyxin B, silver nanoparticles) toward selected bacteria, including drug-sensitive and drug-resistant strains, as well as toward some mammalian cells (human erythrocytes, PBMC, neutrophils, murine peritoneal macrophages and Ehrlich ascites carcinoma cells). Using “checkerboard titrations” for fractional inhibitory concentration indexes evaluation, it was found that synergy in antibacterial action mainly occurs between highly membrane-active AMPs (e.g., protegrin 1, hBD-3) and antibiotics with intracellular targets (e.g., gentamicin, rifampcin), suggesting bioavailability increase as the main model of such interaction. In some combinations modulation of dynamics of AMP-bacterial membrane interaction in presence of the antibiotic was also shown. Cytotoxic effects of the same combinations toward normal eukaryotic cells were rarely synergistic. The obtained data approve that combined application of antimicrobial peptides with antibiotics or other antimicrobials is a promising strategy for further development of new approach for combating antibiotic-resistant bacteria by usage of AMP-based therapeutics. Revealing the conventional antibiotics that increase the activity of human endogenous AMPs against particular pathogens is also important for cure strategies elaboration.

1 June 2010 in Infection and Immunity
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
VSVera Sass
Vera Sass
TSTanja Schneider
Tanja Schneider
MWMiriam Wilmes
Miriam Wilmes
CKChristian Körner
Christian Körner
SPSabrina Pacor
Sabrina Pacor
HSHans-Georg Sahl
Hans-Georg Sahl
Human β-defensin 3 (hBD3) is a highly charged (+11) cationic host defense peptide, produced by epithelial cells and neutrophils. hBD3 retains antimicrobial activity against a broad range of pathogens, including multiresistantStaphylococcus aureus, even under high-salt conditions. Whereas antimicrobial host defense peptides are assumed to act by permeabilizing cell membranes, the transcriptional response pattern of hBD3-treated staphylococcal cells resembled that of vancomycin-treated cells (V. Sass, U. Pag, A. Tossi, G. Bierbaum, and H. G. Sahl, Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 298:619-633, 2008) and suggested that inhibition of cell wall biosynthesis is a major component of the killing process. hBD3-treated cells, inspected by transmission electron microscopy, showed localized protrusions of cytoplasmic contents, and analysis of the intracellular pool of nucleotide-activated cell wall precursors demonstrated accumulation of the final soluble precursor, UDP-MurNAc-pentapeptide. Accumulation is typically induced by antibiotics that inhibit membrane-bound steps of cell wall biosynthesis and also demonstrates that hBD3 does not impair the biosynthetic capacity of cells and does not cause gross leakage of small cytoplasmic compounds. Inin vitroassays of individual membrane-associated cell wall biosynthesis reactions (MraY, MurG, FemX, and penicillin-binding protein 2 [PBP2]), hBD3 inhibited those enzymes which use the bactoprenol-bound cell wall building block lipid II as a substrate; quantitative analysis suggested that hBD3 may stoichiometrically bind to lipid II. We report that binding of hBD3 to defined, lipid II-rich sites of cell wall biosynthesis may lead to perturbation of the biosynthesis machinery, resulting in localized lesions in the cell wall as demonstrated by electron microscopy. The lesions may then allow for osmotic rupture of cells when defensins are tested under low-salt conditions.

11 April 1994 in FEBS Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SHSylvia S.L. Harwig
Sylvia S.L. Harwig
KSKristine M. Swiderek
Kristine M. Swiderek
VKVladimir N. Kokryakov
Vladimir N. Kokryakov
LTLeonie Tan
Leonie Tan
TLTerry D. Lee
Terry D. Lee
RLRobert I. Lehrer
Robert I. Lehrer

3 January 2008 in Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
UPU. Pag
U. Pag
MOM. Oedenkoven
M. Oedenkoven
VSV. Sass
V. Sass
YSY. Shai
Y. Shai
Olga ShamovaOlga Shamova
Olga Shamova
HSH.-G. Sahl
H.-G. Sahl
Objectives Cationic antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are indispensable components of innate immune systems and promising candidates for novel anti-infective strategies. We rationally designed a series of peptides based on a template derived from known α-helical AMPs, which were then analysed regarding efficacy against clinical isolates and antibiotic mechanisms.

17 December 2021 in Frontiers in Microbiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MZMaria S. Zharkova
Maria S. Zharkova
OGOlga Yu. Golubeva
Olga Yu. Golubeva
DODmitriy S. Orlov
Dmitriy S. Orlov
EVElizaveta V. Vladimirova
Elizaveta V. Vladimirova
ADAlexander V. Dmitriev
Alexander V. Dmitriev
Olga ShamovaOlga Shamova
Olga Shamova
Silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) and antimicrobial peptides or proteins (AMPs/APs) are both considered as promising platforms for the development of novel therapeutic agents effective against the growing number of drug-resistant pathogens. The observed synergy of their antibacterial activity suggested the prospect of introducing antimicrobial peptides or small antimicrobial proteins into the gelatinized coating of AgNPs. Conjugates with protegrin-1, indolicidin, protamine, histones, and lysozyme were comparatively tested for their antibacterial properties and compared with unconjugated nanoparticles and antimicrobial polypeptides alone. Their toxic effects were similarly tested against both normal eukaryotic cells (human erythrocytes, peripheral blood mononuclear cells, neutrophils, and dermal fibroblasts) and tumor cells (human erythromyeloid leukemia K562 and human histiocytic lymphoma U937 cell lines). The AMPs/APs retained their ability to enhance the antibacterial activity of AgNPs against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, including drug-resistant strains, when conjugated to the AgNP surface. The small, membranolytic protegrin-1 was the most efficient, suggesting that a short, rigid structure is not a limiting factor despite the constraints imposed by binding to the nanoparticle. Some of the conjugated AMPs/APs clearly affected the ability of nanoparticle to permeabilize the outer membrane of Escherichia coli, but none of the conjugated AgNPs acquired the capacity to permeabilize its cytoplasmic membrane, regardless of the membranolytic potency of the bound polypeptide. Low hemolytic activity was also found for all AgNP-AMP/AP conjugates, regardless of the hemolytic activity of the free polypeptides, making conjugation a promising strategy not only to enhance their antimicrobial potential but also to effectively reduce the toxicity of membranolytic AMPs. The observation that metabolic processes and O2 consumption in bacteria were efficiently inhibited by all forms of AgNPs is the most likely explanation for their rapid and bactericidal action. AMP-dependent properties in the activity pattern of various conjugates toward eukaryotic cells suggest that immunomodulatory, wound-healing, and other effects of the polypeptides are at least partially transferred to the nanoparticles, so that functionalization of AgNPs may have effects beyond just modulation of direct antibacterial activity. In addition, some conjugated nanoparticles are selectively toxic to tumor cells. However, caution is required as not all modulatory effects are necessarily beneficial to normal host cells.