The automatic detection of gait events (i.e., Initial Contact (IC) and Final Contact (FC)) is crucial for the characterisation of gait from Inertial Measurements Units. In this article, we present a method for detecting steps (i.e., IC and FC) from signals of gait sequences of individuals recorded with a gyrometer. The proposed approach combines the use of a dictionary of templates and a Dynamic Time Warping (DTW) measure of fit to retrieve these templates into input signals. Several strategies for choosing and learning the adequate templates from annotated data are also described. The method is tested on thirteen healthy subjects and compared to gold standard. Depending of the template choice, the proposed algorithm achieves average errors from 0.01 to 0.03 s for the detection of IC, FC and step duration. Results demonstrate that the use of DTW allows achieving these performances with only one single template. DTW is a convenient tool to perform pattern recognition on gait gyrometer signals. This study paves the way for new step detection methods: it shows that using one single template associated with non-linear deformations may be sufficient to model the gait of healthy subjects.

Gait assessment and quantification have received an increased interest in recent years. Embedded technologies and low-cost sensors can be used for the longitudinal follow-up of various populations (neurological diseases, elderly, etc.). However, the comparison of two gait trials remains a tricky question as standard gait features may prove to be insufficient in some cases. This article describes a new algorithm for comparing two gait trials recorded with inertial measurement units (IMUs). This algorithm uses a library of step templates extracted from one trial and attempts to detect similar steps in the second trial through a greedy template matching approach. The output of our method is a similarity index (SId) comprised between 0 and 1 that reflects the similarity between the patterns observed in both trials. Results on healthy and multiple sclerosis subjects show that this new comparison tool can be used for both inter-individual comparison and longitudinal follow-up.