Background: There have been substantial improvements in the management of chronic pancreatitis, leading to the publication of several national guidelines during recent years. In collaboration with United European Gastroenterology, the working group on ‘Harmonizing diagnosis and treatment of chronic pancreatitis across Europe’ (HaPanEU) developed these European guidelines using an evidence‐based approach.Methods: Twelve multidisciplinary review groups performed systematic literature reviews to answer 101 predefined clinical questions. Recommendations were graded using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system and the answers were assessed by the entire group in a Delphi process online. The review groups presented their recommendations during the 2015 annual meeting of United European Gastroenterology. At this one‐day, interactive conference, relevant remarks were voiced and overall agreement on each recommendation was quantified using plenary voting (Test and Evaluation Directorate). After a final round of adjustments based on these comments, a draft version was sent out to external reviewers.Results: The 101 recommendations covered 12 topics related to the clinical management of chronic pancreatitis: aetiology (working party (WP)1), diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis with imaging (WP2 and WP3), diagnosis of pancreatic exocrine insufficiency (WP4), surgery in chronic pancreatitis (WP5), medical therapy (WP6), endoscopic therapy (WP7), treatment of pancreatic pseudocysts (WP8), pancreatic pain (WP9), nutrition and malnutrition (WP10), diabetes mellitus (WP11) and the natural course of the disease and quality of life (WP12). Using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system, 70 of the 101 (70%) recommendations were rated as ‘strong' and plenary voting revealed ‘strong agreement' for 99 (98%) recommendations.Conclusions: The 2016 HaPanEU/United European Gastroenterology guidelines provide evidence‐based recommendations concerning key aspects of the medical and surgical management of chronic pancreatitis based on current available evidence. These recommendations should serve as a reference standard for existing management of the disease and as a guide for future clinical research.

Objective: To develop a new international classification of acute pancreatitis severity on the basis of a sound conceptual framework, comprehensive review of published evidence, and worldwide consultation. Background: The Atlanta definitions of acute pancreatitis severity are ingrained in the lexicon of pancreatologists but suboptimal because these definitions are based on empiric description of occurrences that are merely associated with severity. Methods: A personal invitation to contribute to the development of a new international classification of acute pancreatitis severity was sent to all surgeons, gastroenterologists, internists, intensivists, and radiologists who are currently active in clinical research on acute pancreatitis. The invitation was not limited to members of certain associations or residents of certain countries. A global Web-based survey was conducted and a dedicated international symposium was organized to bring contributors from different disciplines together and discuss the concept and definitions. Result: The new international classification is based on the actual local and systemic determinants of severity, rather than description of events that are correlated with severity. The local determinant relates to whether there is (peri)pancreatic necrosis or not, and if present, whether it is sterile or infected. The systemic determinant relates to whether there is organ failure or not, and if present, whether it is transient or persistent. The presence of one determinant can modify the effect of another such that the presence of both infected (peri)pancreatic necrosis and persistent organ failure have a greater effect on severity than either determinant alone. The derivation of a classification based on the above principles results in 4 categories of severity—mild, moderate, severe, and critical. Conclusions: This classification is the result of a consultative process amongst pancreatologists from 49 countries spanning North America, South America, Europe, Asia, Oceania, and Africa. It provides a set of concise up-to-date definitions of all the main entities pertinent to classifying the severity of acute pancreatitis in clinical practice and research. This ensures that the determinant-based classification can be used in a uniform manner throughout the world.

Early aggressive hydration is widely recommended for the management of acute pancreatitis, but evidence for this practice is limited.

Minimal hepatic encephalopathy (MHE) is mainly diagnosed using psychometric tests such as the psychometric hepatic encephalopathy score (PHES). Despite the clinical and social relevance of MHE, psychometric testing is not widespread in routine clinical care. We assessed the usefulness of the critical flicker frequency (CFF), for the diagnosis of MHE and for the prediction of the development of overt episodes of HE. The normal range of PHES in the Spanish population was evaluated in a control group. Subsequently, 114 patients with cirrhosis and 103 healthy controls underwent both PHES and CFF tests. A diagnosis of MHE was made when the PHES was lower than −4 points. Patients were followed‐up every 6 months for a total of 1 year. CFF did not correlate with age, education, or sex in the control group. The mean CFF was significantly lower in patients with MHE versus non‐MHE or controls. Mean CFF correlated with individual psychometric tests as well as PHES (r = 0.54; P < 0.001). CFF <38 Hz was predictive of further bouts of overt HE (log‐rank: 14.2; P < 0.001). There was a weak correlation between mean CFF and Child‐Pugh score but not with model for end‐stage liver disease score. In multivariate analysis using Cox regression, CFF together with Child‐Pugh score was independently associated with the development of overt HE. Conclusion: CFF is a simple, reliable, and accurate method for the diagnosis of MHE. It is not influenced by age or education and could predict the development of overt HE. (HEPATOLOGY 2007;45:879–885.)

Obesity is considered a risk factor in patients with acute pancreatitis. However, the relationship between obesity and mortality in this disease has not been confirmed definitively even in a previous meta-analysis. Since the publication of our previous meta-analysis, one study has been reported about the prognostic value of obesity in acute pancreatitis. We have performed a new meta-analysis to confirm the relationship between obesity and the outcome of acute pancreatitis. A MEDLINE search using 'pancreatitis', 'obesity' and 'body mass index' as search terms. Clinical studies which investigated the prognostic value of obesity in acute pancreatitis with the following criteria: (a) inclusion of mild and severe acute pancreatitis; (b) use of body mass index (BMI) as the measure of obesity; (c) definition of obesity as BMI >or=30 kg/m(2); (d) definition of severity of acute pancreatitis according to the criteria established in the Atlanta Symposium. Five studies including patients with mild and severe acute pancreatitis and obesity measured by BMI were analyzed. The end points of the meta-analysis were the severity of acute pancreatitis, local complications, systemic complications and mortality. Pooled odds ratio (OR) and confidence intervals (CI) were calculated according to the Mantel-Haenszel method, and heterogeneity was assessed by the multiplicative inverse variance method. Seven hundred and thirty-nine patients were included. There was no heterogeneity for the variables severity, systemic complications, local complications and mortality among the included studies. Severe acute pancreatitis was significantly more frequent in obese patients (OR 2.9, 95% CI 1.8-4.6). Furthermore, those patients developed significantly more systemic (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.4-3.8) and especially local complications (OR 3.8, 95% CI 2.4-6.6). In this new analysis, mortality was also higher in obese patients (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.0-4.8). Obesity is not only a risk factor for the development of local and systemic complications in acute pancreatitis: it also increases the mortality of this disease.

The overall objective of these guidelines is to provide evidence‐based recommendations for the diagnosis and management of immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4)‐related digestive disease in adults and children. IgG4‐related digestive disease can be diagnosed only with a comprehensive work‐up that includes histology, organ morphology at imaging, serology, search for other organ involvement, and response to glucocorticoid treatment. Indications for treatment are symptomatic patients with obstructive jaundice, abdominal pain, posterior pancreatic pain, and involvement of extra‐pancreatic digestive organs, including IgG4‐related cholangitis. Treatment with glucocorticoids should be weight‐based and initiated at a dose of 0.6–0.8 mg/kg body weight/day orally (typical starting dose 30‐40 mg/day prednisone equivalent) for 1 month to induce remission and then be tapered within two additional months. Response to initial treatment should be assessed at week 2–4 with clinical, biochemical and morphological markers. Maintenance treatment with glucocorticoids should be considered in multi‐organ disease or history of relapse. If there is no change in disease activity and burden within 3 months, the diagnosis should be reconsidered. If the disease relapsed during the 3 months of treatment, immunosuppressive drugs should be added.