Quoc Thien Bui

Quoc Thien Bui


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

8Years (2019-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
3 August 2021 in Thyroid®
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HVHuy Gia Vuong
Huy Gia Vuong
DCDuy Giang Bao Chung
Duy Giang Bao Chung
LNLuan Minh Ngo
Luan Minh Ngo
QBQuoc Thien Bui
Quoc Thien Bui
LHLewis Hassell
Lewis Hassell
Andrey BychkovAndrey Bychkov
Andrey Bychkov
Background: Little is known about the application of the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (TBSRTC) in pediatric thyroid nodules. This meta-analysis was aimed to investigate the use of TBSRTC in the pediatric population. Methods: Relevant articles were searched in PubMed and Web of Science. Meta-analysis of proportion and its 95% confidence interval (CI) were computed utilizing the random-effect model. We used subgroup analyses and meta-regression to explore the sources of heterogeneities. Egger's regression test and funnel plot visualization were used to examine publication bias. Results: We included 17 articles comprising of 3687 pediatric thyroid nodules for meta-analyses. TBSRTC outputs including frequency and risk of malignancy (ROM) for the majority of categories were not statistically different from recently published meta-analysis of 145,066 thyroid nodules in adult patients. The resection rate (RR) in the pediatric group was significantly higher in most of the categories compared with published adult data: benign, 23.2% [CI = 18.6–27.9] vs. 13.0% [CI = 9.5–16.5]; atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance, 62.6% [CI = 50.3–74.9] vs. 36.2% [CI = 29.9–42.5]; follicular neoplasm/suspicious for follicular neoplasm, 84.3% [CI = 75.2–93.4] vs. 60.5% [CI = 54.5–66.5]; and suspicious for malignancy, 93.8% [CI = 90.1–97.6] vs. 69.7% [CI = 64.0–75.5]. Conclusion: TBSRTC is a valuable tool to make clinical decisions for pediatric patients with thyroid nodules. Pediatric patients with benign and indeterminate thyroid nodules had a higher RR than adult counterpart, but ROM of these categories in adults and children was not statistically different suggesting a potential risk of overtreatment in pediatric patients. Determining the best treatment guidelines and additional tools for risk stratification must be a top priority to precisely identify the target patient groups for surgical intervention.

QBQuoc Thien Bui
Quoc Thien Bui
QBQuoc Van Phu Bui
Quoc Van Phu Bui
DNDávid Németh
Dávid Németh
Peter HegyiPeter Hegyi
Peter Hegyi
ZSZsolt Szakács
Zsolt Szakács
OVOrsolya Varga
Orsolya Varga
Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are one the common complications of diabetes mellitus. Many trials were performed to evaluate the effect of recombinant human epidermal growth factor (rhEGF) in healing DFUs. This meta-analysis was performed to synthesize the evidence of rhEGF treatment in DFUs in comparison to placebo. Databases included for the search were PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, EBSCOhost, ScienceDirect, and Scopus (up to January 2019). The outcome of interest was the complete healing rate of DFUs. We performed random effects meta-analysis stratified by the types of administration route (intralesional injection and topical apply) by calculating the odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI). A total of six studies involving 530 patients were eligible for analysis. The combined OR (intralesional injection and topical apply) was 4.005 (95% CI: (2.248; 7.135), p < 0.001). The ORs for intralesional injection and topical application were 3.599 (95% CI: (1.213; 10.677), p = 0.021) and 4.176 (95% CI: (2.112; 8.256), p < 0.001), respectively. Statistical heterogeneity might not be important in overall treatment (I2 = 15.17, p = 0.317) and both of the subgroups (I2: 24.56, p = 0.25 and I2: 33.26, p = 0.213, respectively). Our results support the use of rhEGF in the treatment of DFUs.

16 February 2021 in Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NFNuno Franco
Nuno Franco
SMSónia Miranda
Sónia Miranda
NKNóra Kovács
Nóra Kovács
ANAttila Nagy
Attila Nagy
QBQuoc Thien Bui
Quoc Thien Bui
OVOrsolya Varga
Orsolya Varga
Although there is a wide range of animal models of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) used in research; we have limited evidence on their translation value. This paper provides a) a comparison of preclinical animal and clinical results on the effect of five dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP4) inhibitors by comparing the pharmaceutical caused glucose changes, and b) an evaluation of methodological and reporting standards in T2DM preclinical animal studies. DPP4 inhibitors play an important role in the clinical management of T2DM: if metformin alone is not sufficient enough to control the blood sugar levels, DPP4 inhibitors are often used as second-line therapy; additionally, DPP-4 inhibitors are also used in triple therapies with metformin and sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors or with metformin and insulin. In our analysis of 124 preclinical studies and 47 clinical trials, (1) we found no evidence of species differences in glucose change response to DPP4 inhibitors, which may suggest that, for this drug class, studies in mice and rats may be equally predictive of how well a drug will work in humans; and (2) there is good reporting of group size, sex, age, euthanasia method and self-reported compliance with animal welfare regulations in animal studies but poor reporting of justification of group size, along with a strong bias towards the use of male animals and young animals. Instead of the common non-transparent model selection, we call for a reflective and evidenced-based assessment of predictive validity of the animal models currently available.