Joanne M, Dickson

Prof. Joanne M, Dickson

School of Arts and Humanities (Psychology), Edith Cowan University, Perth, WA 6027, Australia
orcid
PhD

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

23Years (2004-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 February 2018 in Journal of Affective Disorders
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PTPeter Taylor
Peter Taylor
KJKhowla Jomar
Khowla Jomar
KDKatie Dhingra
Katie Dhingra
RFRebecca Forrester
Rebecca Forrester
USUjala Shahmalak
Ujala Shahmalak
Joanne M, DicksonJoanne M, Dickson
Joanne M, Dickson
A broad variety of different functions can underlie acts of Non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI). Whilst research so far has identified many of the commonly reported functions, no reliable estimates of prevalence currently exist for these different NSSI functions. Understanding the prevalence of NSSI functions represents a key to better understanding the phenomenology of NSSI and addressing the differing needs of the NSSI population. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the prevalence of NSSI functions in community and clinical samples. A literature search of electronic databases PsycINFO, Medline, and Web of Science from date of inception to March 2017 was undertaken. A pre-specified framework for categorising different functions of NSSI was used to collate data from across studies. A random-effects meta-analysis of prevalence was then undertaken on these data. Intrapersonal functions (66-81%), and especially those concerning emotion regulation were most commonly reported by individuals who engage in NSSI (63-78%). Interpersonal functions (e.g., expressing distress) were less common (33-56%). The review was limited to English-language articles. Reviewed articles were inconsistent in their measurement of NSSI. Inconsistency within pooled prevalence estimates was high when moderators were not accounted for. Findings indicate that intrapersonal functions of NSSI are most common and are present for the majority of participants. This finding supports dominant emotion-regulation models of NSSI, and the use of interventions that work to improve emotion-regulation ability. However, interpersonal functions remain endorsed by a substantial portion of participants.

1 June 2004 in Cognitive Therapy and Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Joanne M, DicksonJoanne M, Dickson
Joanne M, Dickson
AMAndrew K. MacLeod
Andrew K. MacLeod

28 February 2019 in Obesity
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JSJade Spinosa
Jade Spinosa
PCPaul Christiansen
Paul Christiansen
Joanne M, DicksonJoanne M, Dickson
Joanne M, Dickson
VLValentina Lorenzetti
Valentina Lorenzetti
CHCharlotte Hardman
Charlotte Hardman
Objective: Lower socioeconomic status is robustly associated with obesity; however, the underpinning psychological mechanisms remain unclear. The current study sought to determine whether the relationship between lower socioeconomic status and obesity is explained by psychological distress and subsequent emotional eating as a coping strategy. It also examined whether psychological resilience plays a protective role in this pathway.Methods: Participants (N = 150) from a range of socioeconomic backgrounds completed questionnaire measures of psychological distress, emotional eating, and resilience. They reported their income and education level as an indicator of socioeconomic status and their height and weight in order to calculate BMI.Results: There was a significant indirect effect of socioeconomic status on BMI via psychological distress and emotional eating; specifically, lower socioeconomic status was associated with higher distress, higher distress was associated with higher emotional eating, and higher emotional eating was associated with higher BMI (b [SE] = −0.02 [0.01]; 95% CI: −0.04 to −0.01). However, resilience was not a significant moderator of this association.Conclusions: Psychological distress and subsequent emotional eating represent a serial pathway that links lower socioeconomic status with obesity. Targeting these maladaptive coping behaviors may be one strategy to reduce obesity in low‐income populations.

4 September 2018 in Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SBSuzanne P. M. Blythin
Suzanne P. M. Blythin
HNHannah L. Nicholson
Hannah L. Nicholson
VMVanessa Macintyre
Vanessa Macintyre
Joanne M, DicksonJoanne M, Dickson
Joanne M, Dickson
JFJohn R. E. Fox
John R. E. Fox
PTPeter Taylor
Peter Taylor

1 March 2017 in Journal of Affective Disorders
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RMRay P.C. Manning
Ray P.C. Manning
Joanne M, DicksonJoanne M, Dickson
Joanne M, Dickson
JPJasper Palmier-Claus
Jasper Palmier-Claus
ACAlexandra Cunliffe
Alexandra Cunliffe
PTPeter J. Taylor
Peter J. Taylor

13 September 2017 in Archives of Sexual Behavior
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RSRebekah Shallcross
Rebekah Shallcross
Joanne M, DicksonJoanne M, Dickson
Joanne M, Dickson
DNDavid Nunns
David Nunns
CMCatharine Mackenzie
Catharine Mackenzie
GKGundi Kiemle
Gundi Kiemle
Vulvodynia, the experience of an idiopathic pain in the form of burning, soreness, or throbbing in the vulval area, affects around 4–16% of the population. The current review used systematic search strategies and meta-ethnography as a means of identifying, analyzing, and synthesizing the existing literature pertaining to women’s subjective experiences of living with vulvodynia. Four key concepts were identified: (1) Social Constructions: Sex, Women, and Femininity: Women experienced negative consequences of social narratives around womanhood, sexuality, and femininity, including the prioritization of penetrative sex, the belief that it is the role of women to provide sex for men, and media portrayals of sex as easy and natural. (2) Seeking Help: Women experienced the healthcare system as dismissive, sometimes being prescribed treatments that exacerbated the experience of pain. (3) Psychological and Relational Impact of Vulvodynia: Women experienced feeling shame and guilt, which in turn led to the experience of psychological distress, low mood, anxiety, and low self-esteem. Moreover, women reported feeling silenced which in turn affected their heterosexual relationships and their peer relationships by feeling social isolated. (4) A Way Forward: Women found changing narratives, as well as group and individual multidisciplinary approaches, helpful in managing vulvodynia. The findings of the review conclude that interventions at the individual level, as well as interventions aimed at equipping women to challenge social narratives, may be helpful for the psychological well-being of women with vulvodynia.