Paragangliomas and pheochromytomas (PPGLs) exhibit variable malignancy, advanced/hormonally active/progressive need therapy. PRRT (Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy) could be an option for these patients. To evaluate the effectiveness of PRRT (90Y DOTATATE), based on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), in patients with PPGLs, related to SDHx gene mutation, we conducted a prospective open-label, single-center, phase II study. Thirteen patients were observed, eight PGL1 and five PGL4, all with advanced, non-resectable tumors, and eight had metastases. All were treated with 90Y DOTATATE. Efficacy was based on OS and PFS, and radiological response was based on RECIST. Hormonal activity was evaluated using serum-fractionated free catecholamines. Eight subjects had a clinical response, three were stable, and two exhibited disease progression. Among four patients with hormonally-active PPGLs, three showed a reduction and one showed normalization. OS for all was 68.0 months; PFS was 35.0 months. OS in PGL4 = 25.0 vs. N.R. (not reached) in PGL1. PFS in PGL4 = 12.0 vs. N.R. in PGL1. A difference was seen in the OS and PFS in patients who did not respond clinically, compared to those who did, OS = 22.0 vs. N.R. PFS = 7.0 vs. N.R. A difference in the OS and PFS was noted in patients with liver and bone involvement compared to those without. PRRT is an effective therapy in selected population of patients with SDHx, in those with locally-advanced, non-resectable tumors. Furthermore, it is effective regardless of the secretory status.

Background: Acute aortic dissection is a rare but potentially lethal disease characterized by high early mortality when left untreated. However, survival may be significantly improved by the timely institution of appropriate medical and/or surgical therapy. Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is one of the most common hereditary disorders, accounting for 8-10% of the cases of end-stage renal disease. Hypertension occurs frequently and is an early manifestation of ADPKD in approximately 50-70% of non-azotemic patients. ADPKD, often caused by mutations in the PKD1 gene, is associated with life-threatening vascular abnormalities that are commonly attributed to the frequent occurrence of hypertension. Methods: We present two cases of hypertensive patients with acute aortic dissection (type A Stanford) coexisting with ADPKD. Results: A 54-year-old male hypertensive patient and a 47-year-old male hypertensive patient, both with known ADPKD were diagnosed and operated with acute dissection of ascending aorta. Both patients were characterized by severe hypertension; therefore, in both cases, degree of hypertension is likely to be causative for this vascular complication. However, since ADPKD is associated with the vascular complications mentioned above, abnormality of the structure of the arterial wall of the thoracic aorta cannot be ruled out. Conclusion: Aortic dissection is a rare but potentially disastrous complication, and clinicians should always consider this when dealing with patients with ADPKD who present with chest pain or collapse.

Carcinoid heart disease (CHD) is a severe complication of carcinoid syndrome (CS) found primarily in patients with small intestine neuroendocrine neoplasms (SI-NENs). Patients who develop CHD have significantly worse morbidity and mortality outcomes, highlighting the importance of clinical practice recommendations for CHD screening, diagnosis, and treatment that are both consistent and practical. CHD is characterized by white plaque-like deposits on the endocardial surface of heart structures, generally affecting the right heart valves, causing tricuspid and pulmonary regurgitation and, less commonly, valve stenosis. Cardiac imaging is essential for both the diagnosis and management of CHD. Previously, imaging for CHD was mostly achieved by echocardiography, but more recently, imaging has become multimodal. N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid in the urine (u5-HIAA) are currently the most effective markers used in screening CS patients and evaluating CHD severity. Managing patients with CHD is challenging since both systemic malignant disease and cardiac involvement must be treated concurrently. Early diagnosis and surgical intervention when required are critical to patient prognosis, especially in those without primary tumor resection. Valve replacement surgery is the most effective treatment for patients with advanced carcinoid heart disease for alleviating cardiac symptoms and contributing to survival outcomes. To deliver effective patient treatment, multidisciplinary team collaboration is needed. This review summarizes current research findings on CHD pathogenesis, clinical and epidemiological features, useful biomarkers and imaging modalities, and treatment strategies.

Neuroendocrine neoplasms of the small intestine (SI-NENs) are one of the most commonly recognized gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs). Carcinoid heart disease (CHD) is the primary cause of death in patients with the carcinoid syndrome (CS). The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate possible factors impacting upon overall survival (OS) in subjects with both neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) G1/G2 of the small intestine (SI-NET) and CHD. Enrolled in our study of 275 patients with confirmed G1/G2 SI-NET, were 28 (10%) individuals with CHD. Overall survival was assessed using the Kaplan–Meier method. The Cox–Mantel test was used to determine how OS varied between groups. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to conduct univariate analyses of predictive factors for OS and estimate hazard ratios (HRs). Of the 28 individuals with confirmed carcinoid heart disease, 12 (43%) were found to have NET G1 and 16 (57%) were found to have NET G2. Univariate analysis revealed that subjects with CHD and without resection of the primary tumor had a lower OS. Our retrospective study observed that patients who presented with CHD and without resection of primary tumor had worse prognosis of survival. These results suggest that primary tumors may need to be removed when feasible, but further research is needed. However, no solid recommendations can be issued on the basis of our single retrospective study.