Federico Ferrari

Mr. Federico Ferrari


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

8Years (2019-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
14 October 2020 in Membranes
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Gaetan BlandinGaetan Blandin
Gaetan Blandin
FFFederico Ferrari
Federico Ferrari
Geoffroy LesageGeoffroy Lesage
Geoffroy Lesage
Pierre LeClechPierre LeClech
Pierre LeClech
MHMarc Heran
Marc Heran
XMXavier Martínez-Lladó
Xavier Martínez-Lladó
In the past few years, osmotic membrane systems, such as forward osmosis (FO), have gained popularity as “soft” concentration processes. FO has unique properties by combining high rejection rate and low fouling propensity and can be operated without significant pressure or temperature gradient, and therefore can be considered as a potential candidate for a broad range of concentration applications where current technologies still suffer from critical limitations. This review extensively compiles and critically assesses recent considerations of FO as a concentration process for applications, including food and beverages, organics value added compounds, water reuse and nutrients recovery, treatment of waste streams and brine management. Specific requirements for the concentration process regarding the evaluation of concentration factor, modules and design and process operation, draw selection and fouling aspects are also described. Encouraging potential is demonstrated to concentrate streams more than 20-fold with high rejection rate of most compounds and preservation of added value products. For applications dealing with highly concentrated or complex streams, FO still features lower propensity to fouling compared to other membranes technologies along with good versatility and robustness. However, further assessments on lab and pilot scales are expected to better define the achievable concentration factor, rejection and effective concentration of valuable compounds and to clearly demonstrate process limitations (such as fouling or clogging) when reaching high concentration rate. Another important consideration is the draw solution selection and its recovery that should be in line with application needs (i.e., food compatible draw for food and beverage applications, high osmotic pressure for brine management, etc.) and be economically competitive.

25 April 2022 in Water Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
FFFederico Ferrari
Federico Ferrari
MPMaite Pijuan
Maite Pijuan
SMSam Molenaar
Sam Molenaar
NDNick Duinslaeger
Nick Duinslaeger
Tom SleutelsTom Sleutels
Tom Sleutels
JRJelena Radjenovic
Jelena Radjenovic
Ammonia recovery from centrate of an anaerobic digester was investigated using an onsite bipolar-electrodialysis (BP-ED) pilot scale plant coupled to two liquid/liquid membrane contactor (LLMC) modules. To investigate the process performance and robustness, the pilot plant was operated at varying current densities, load ratio (current to nitrogen loading), and in continuous and intermittent current (Donnan) mode. A higher load ratio led to higher total ammonium nitrogen (TAN, sum of ammonia and ammonium) removal efficiency, whereas the increase in the applied current did not have a significant impact the TAN removal efficiency. Continuous current application resulted in the higher TAN removal compared with the Donnan dialysis mode. The lowest specific energy consumption of 6.3 kWh kgN-1 was recorded in the Donnan mode, with the load ratio of 1.4, at 200 L h-1 flowrate and current density of 75 A m-2. Lower energy demand observed in the Donnan mode was likely due to the lower scaling and fouling of the ion exchange membranes. Nevertheless, scaling and fouling limited the operation of the BP-ED stack in all operational modes, which had to be interrupted by the daily cleaning procedures. The LLMC module enabled a highly selective recovery of ammonia as ammonium sulfate ((NH4)2SO4), with the concentration of ammonia ranging from 19 to 33 gN L-1. However, the analysis of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) in the obtained (NH4)2SO4 product revealed the presence of 212-253 ng L-1 of 6:2 fluorotelomer sulfonate (FTS), a common substitute of legacy PFAS. Given the very low concentrations of 6:2 FTS (i.e., < 2 ng L-1) encountered in the concentrated stream, 6:2 FTS was likely released from the Teflon-based components in the sulfuric acid dosage line. Thus, careful selection of the pilot plant tubing, pumps and other components is required to avoid any risks associated with the PFAS presence and ensure safe use of the final product as fertilizer.

5 August 2019 in Membranes
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FFFederico Ferrari
Federico Ferrari
MPMaite Pijuan
Maite Pijuan
IRIgnasi Rodriguez-Roda
Ignasi Rodriguez-Roda
Gaetan BlandinGaetan Blandin
Gaetan Blandin
Applying forward osmosis directly on raw municipal wastewater is of high interest for the simultaneous production of a high quality permeate for water reuse and pre-concentrating wastewater for anaerobic digestion. This pilot scale study investigates, for the first time, the feasibility of concentrating real raw municipal wastewater using a submerged plate and frame forward osmosis module (0.34 m2) to reach 70% water recovery. Membrane performance, fouling behavior, and effective concentration of wastewater compounds were examined. Two different draw solutions (NaCl and MgCl2), operating either with constant draw concentration or in batch with draw dilution over time, were evaluated. Impact of gas sparging on fouling and external concentration polarization was also assessed. Water fluxes up to 15 L m−2 h−1 were obtained with clean water and 35 g NaCl/L as feed and draw solution, respectively. When using real wastewater, submerged forward osmosis proved to be resilient to clogging, demonstrating its suitability for application on municipal or other complex wastewater; operating with 11.7 g NaCl/L constant draw solution, water and reverse salt fluxes up to 5.1 ± 1.0 L m−2 h−1 and 4.8 ± 2.6 g m−2 h−1 were observed, respectively. Positively, total and soluble chemical oxygen demand concentration factors of 2.47 ± 0.15 and 1.86 ± 0.08, respectively, were achieved, making wastewater more suitable for anaerobic treatment.

1 June 2019 in Science of The Total Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FFFederico Ferrari
Federico Ferrari
JBJose Luis Balcazar
Jose Luis Balcazar
IRIgnasi Rodríguez-Roda
Ignasi Rodríguez-Roda
MPMaite Pijuan
Maite Pijuan

15 April 2022 in Journal of Cleaner Production
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SVSergi Vinardell
Sergi Vinardell
Gaetan BlandinGaetan Blandin
Gaetan Blandin
FFFederico Ferrari
Federico Ferrari
Geoffroy LesageGeoffroy Lesage
Geoffroy Lesage
JMJoan Mata-Alvarez
Joan Mata-Alvarez
Sergi AstalsSergi Astals
Sergi Astals

4 January 2022 in Chemical Engineering Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LSLuca Sbardella
Luca Sbardella
Gaetan BlandinGaetan Blandin
Gaetan Blandin
AFAriadna Fàbregas
Ariadna Fàbregas
JRJuan Carlos Real Real
Juan Carlos Real Real
ACAnna Serra Clusellas
Anna Serra Clusellas
XMXavier Martinez-Lladó
Xavier Martinez-Lladó