Roberto Deboli

Dr. Roberto Deboli


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

40Years (1987-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 November 2006 in Biosystems Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GBG. Belforte
G. Belforte
RDRoberto Deboli
Roberto Deboli
PGP. Gay
P. Gay
PPP. Piccarolo
P. Piccarolo
DAD. Ricauda Aimonino
D. Ricauda Aimonino

1 March 2017 in International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RDRoberto Deboli
Roberto Deboli
ACAngela Calvo
Angela Calvo
CPChristian Preti
Christian Preti

1 May 2018 in International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ACAngela Calvo
Angela Calvo
ELIO ROMANOELIO ROMANO
ELIO ROMANO
CPChristian Preti
Christian Preti
Giampaolo SchillaciGiampaolo Schillaci
Giampaolo Schillaci
RDRoberto Deboli
Roberto Deboli

5 November 2014 in Journal of Agricultural Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ACAngela Calvo
Angela Calvo
RDRoberto Deboli
Roberto Deboli
CPChristian Preti
Christian Preti
AMAntonino De Maria
Antonino De Maria
The electric hand held olive harvesters have a low weight (about 2 kg) and cause the fruit pick up by means of impacts produced by their vibrational tools: for this reason they transmit elevated vibration doses to the operator’s hand arm system during the work. In this paper electric beaters of different manufacturers and different models were considered, to analyse their vibrational behaviour in field, during the olive harvesting campaign in a site located in Northern Italy. One operator did the tests, to avoid the operator’s uncertainty on the obtained results. All the five examined beaters gave high acceleration values (in a range from 10 to 26 ms–2), but the most restricting data were the daily vibration exposures, calculated considering the real working duration time acquired in field, almost ranged between 10 and 18 ms–2. Also the operator posture during the work (with the arms over the shoulders) may set health problems, related to upper limb disorders, other than the already known musculoskeletal, nervous and vascular pathologies.

1 July 2016 in Applied Ergonomics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RDRoberto Deboli
Roberto Deboli
ACAngela Calvo
Angela Calvo
CPChristian Preti
Christian Preti

ACAngela Calvo
Angela Calvo
CPChristian Preti
Christian Preti
MCMaria Caria
Maria Caria
RDRoberto Deboli
Roberto Deboli
European Directives 2002/44/EC and 2003/10/EC establish the exposure limit values for preventing operators’ risks to vibration and noise transmitted by machines. Few studies studied noise and vibration of agricultural backpack powered machines (as mist blowers and blowers), but nobody critically studied them. This work analyzed the field back vibration, hand-arm vibration (HAV), and noise transmitted to ten operators by eight blowers and mist blowers. Unweighted and weighted vibration were analyzed, using the standards ISO 2631-1 (back), and ISO 5349-1 and ISO/TR 18570 (hand-arm system). The noise was evaluated by recording the acoustic pressure level at the operators’ ears using the ISO 9612. With the ISO 2631-1, the vibration to the operators’ back was low (0.38 ms−2), but the unweighted vibration measured along y and z-axes (not used by the ISO 2631-1) were high (>11 ms−2). HAV were also low when using the ISO 5349-1 (the highest value was 2.51 ms−2 in mist blowers), but high with the ISO/TR 18570 for the onset of vibration white finger (1446 ms−1.5 in blowers). Noise levels were always high: more than 100 dB(A), excluding the blower with the exhaust inside the blower hose. This last machine had noise levels lower than 86 dB(A), but its specific feature could increase environmental pollution.