This paper deals with an experimental analysis of stress prediction and simulation prior to 3D printing via the selective laser melting (SLM) method and the subsequent separation of a printed sample from a base plate in two software programs, ANSYS Addictive Suite and MSC Simufact Additive. Practical verification of the simulation was performed on a 3Dprinted topologically optimized part made of AISI 316L stainless steel. This paper presents a typical workflow for working with metallic 3D printing technology and the state-of-the-art knowledge in the field of stress analysis and simulation of printed components. The paper emphasizes the role of simulation software for additive production and reflects on their weaknesses and strengths as well, with regard to their use not only in science and research but also in practice.
The aim of this work was to monitor the mechanical behavior of 316L stainless steel produced by 3D printing in the vertical direction. The material was tested in the “as printed” state. Digital Image Correlation measurements were used for 4 types of notched specimens. The behavior of these specimens under monotonic loading was investigated in two loading paths: tension and torsion. Based on the experimental data, two yield criteria were used in the finite element analyses. Von Mises criterion and Hill criterion were applied, together with the nonlinear isotropic hardening rule of Voce. Subsequently, the load-deformation responses of simulations and experiments were compared. Results of the Hill criterion show better correlation with experimental data. The numerical study shows that taking into account the difference in yield stress in the horizontal direction of printing plays a crucial role for modeling of notched geometries loaded in the vertical direction of printing. Ductility of 3D printed specimens in the “as printed” state is also compared with 3D printed machined specimens and specimens produced by conventional methods. “As printed” specimens have 2/3 lower ductility than specimens produced by a conventional production method. Machining of “as printed” specimens does not affect the yield stress, but a significant reduction of ductility was observed due to microcracks arising from the pores as a microscopic surface study showed.
Flexible structures (FS) are thin shells with a pattern of holes. The stiffness of the structure in the normal direction is reduced by the shape of gaps rather than by the choice of the material based on mechanical properties such as Young’s modulus. This paper presents virtual prototyping of 3D printed flexible structures with selected planar patterns using laboratory testing and computer modeling. The objective of this work is to develop a non-linear computational model evaluating the structure’s stiffness and its experimental verification; in addition, we aimed to identify the best of the proposed patterns with respect to its stiffness: load-bearing capacity ratio. Following validation, the validated computational model is used for a parametric study of selected patterns. Nylon—Polyamide 12—was chosen for the purposes of this study as an appropriate flexible material suitable for 3D printing. At the end of the work, a computational model of the selected structure with modeling of load-bearing capacity is presented. The obtained results can be used in the design of external biomedical applications such as orthoses, prostheses, cranial remoulding helmets padding, or a new type of adaptive cushions. This paper is an extension of the conference paper: “Modeling and Testing of 3D Printed Flexible Structures with Three-pointed Star Pattern Used in Biomedical Applications” by authors Repa et al.