Xinghua Shi

Xinghua Shi


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
16 April 2019 in Nature Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MCMark J. P. Chaisson
Mark J. P. Chaisson
ASAshley D. Sanders
Ashley D. Sanders
XZXuefang Zhao
Xuefang Zhao
AMAnkit Malhotra
Ankit Malhotra
DPDavid Porubsky
David Porubsky
CLCharles Lee
Charles Lee
The incomplete identification of structural variants (SVs) from whole-genome sequencing data limits studies of human genetic diversity and disease association. Here, we apply a suite of long-read, short-read, strand-specific sequencing technologies, optical mapping, and variant discovery algorithms to comprehensively analyze three trios to define the full spectrum of human genetic variation in a haplotype-resolved manner. We identify 818,054 indel variants (<50 bp) and 27,622 SVs (≥50 bp) per genome. We also discover 156 inversions per genome and 58 of the inversions intersect with the critical regions of recurrent microdeletion and microduplication syndromes. Taken together, our SV callsets represent a three to sevenfold increase in SV detection compared to most standard high-throughput sequencing studies, including those from the 1000 Genomes Project. The methods and the dataset presented serve as a gold standard for the scientific community allowing us to make recommendations for maximizing structural variation sensitivity for future genome sequencing studies.

2 November 2021 in Nature Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GYGang Yu
Gang Yu
KSkai sun
kai sun
CXChao Xu
Chao Xu
XSXinghua Shi
Xinghua Shi
CWChong Wu
Chong Wu
HDHongwen Deng
Hongwen Deng
Machine-assisted pathological recognition has been focused on supervised learning (SL) that suffers from a significant annotation bottleneck. We propose a semi-supervised learning (SSL) method based on the mean teacher architecture using 13,111 whole slide images of colorectal cancer from 8803 subjects from 13 independent centers. SSL (~3150 labeled, ~40,950 unlabeled; ~6300 labeled, ~37,800 unlabeled patches) performs significantly better than the SL. No significant difference is found between SSL (~6300 labeled, ~37,800 unlabeled) and SL (~44,100 labeled) at patch-level diagnoses (area under the curve (AUC): 0.980 ± 0.014 vs. 0.987 ± 0.008, P value = 0.134) and patient-level diagnoses (AUC: 0.974 ± 0.013 vs. 0.980 ± 0.010, P value = 0.117), which is close to human pathologists (average AUC: 0.969). The evaluation on 15,000 lung and 294,912 lymph node images also confirm SSL can achieve similar performance as that of SL with massive annotations. SSL dramatically reduces the annotations, which has great potential to effectively build expert-level pathological artificial intelligence platforms in practice.

28 May 2019 in IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MLMin Li
Min Li
YWYake Wang
Yake Wang
RZRuiqing Zheng
Ruiqing Zheng
XSXinghua Shi
Xinghua Shi
YLYaohang Li
Yaohang Li
JWJianxin Wang
Jianxin Wang
High-throughput screening technologies have provided a large amount of drug sensitivity data for a panel of cancer cell lines and hundreds of compounds. Computational approaches to analyzing these data can benefit anticancer therapeutics by identifying molecular genomic determinants of drug sensitivity and developing new anticancer drugs. In this study, we have developed a deep learning architecture to improve the performance of drug sensitivity prediction based on these data. We integrated both genomic features of cell lines and chemical information of compounds to predict the half maximal inhibitory concentrations (IC50) on the Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia (CCLE) and the Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer (GDSC) datasets using a deep neural network, which we called DeepDSC. Specifically, we first applied a stacked deep autoencoder to extract genomic features of cell lines from gene expression data, and then combined the compounds' chemical features to these genomic features to produce final response data. We conducted 10-fold cross-validation to demonstrate the performance of our deep model in terms of root-mean-square error (RMSE) and coefficient of determination R2 . We show that our model outperforms the previous approaches with RMSE of 0.23 and R2 of 0.78 on CCLE dataset, and RMSE of 0.52 and R2 of 0.78 on GDSC dataset, respectively. Moreover, to demonstrate the prediction ability of our models on novel cell lines or novel compounds, we left cell lines originating from the same tissue and each compound out as the test sets, respectively, and the rest as training sets. The performance was comparable to other methods.

17 November 2017 in BMC Genomics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RXRui Xie
Rui Xie
JWJia Wen
Jia Wen
AQAndrew Quitadamo
Andrew Quitadamo
Jianlin ChengJianlin Cheng
Jianlin Cheng
XSXinghua Shi
Xinghua Shi
Gene expression is a key intermediate level that genotypes lead to a particular trait. Gene expression is affected by various factors including genotypes of genetic variants. With an aim of delineating the genetic impact on gene expression, we build a deep auto-encoder model to assess how good genetic variants will contribute to gene expression changes. This new deep learning model is a regression-based predictive model based on the MultiLayer Perceptron and Stacked Denoising Auto-encoder (MLP-SAE). The model is trained using a stacked denoising auto-encoder for feature selection and a multilayer perceptron framework for backpropagation. We further improve the model by introducing dropout to prevent overfitting and improve performance. To demonstrate the usage of this model, we apply MLP-SAE to a real genomic datasets with genotypes and gene expression profiles measured in yeast. Our results show that the MLP-SAE model with dropout outperforms other models including Lasso, Random Forests and the MLP-SAE model without dropout. Using the MLP-SAE model with dropout, we show that gene expression quantifications predicted by the model solely based on genotypes, align well with true gene expression patterns. We provide a deep auto-encoder model for predicting gene expression from SNP genotypes. This study demonstrates that deep learning is appropriate for tackling another genomic problem, i.e., building predictive models to understand genotypes’ contribution to gene expression. With the emerging availability of richer genomic data, we anticipate that deep learning models play a bigger role in modeling and interpreting genomics.

14 September 2016 in Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
XSXinghua Shi
Xinghua Shi
XWXintao Wu
Xintao Wu

28 August 2019 in Genes
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JCJunjie Chen
Junjie Chen
XSXinghua Shi
Xinghua Shi
Genotype imputation, where missing genotypes can be computationally imputed, is an essential tool in genomic analysis ranging from genome wide associations to phenotype prediction. Traditional genotype imputation methods are typically based on haplotype-clustering algorithms, hidden Markov models (HMMs), and statistical inference. Deep learning-based methods have been recently reported to suitably address the missing data problems in various fields. To explore the performance of deep learning for genotype imputation, in this study, we propose a deep model called a sparse convolutional denoising autoencoder (SCDA) to impute missing genotypes. We constructed the SCDA model using a convolutional layer that can extract various correlation or linkage patterns in the genotype data and applying a sparse weight matrix resulted from the L1 regularization to handle high dimensional data. We comprehensively evaluated the performance of the SCDA model in different scenarios for genotype imputation on the yeast and human genotype data, respectively. Our results showed that SCDA has strong robustness and significantly outperforms popular reference-free imputation methods. This study thus points to another novel application of deep learning models for missing data imputation in genomic studies.