Breast cancer is still a lethal disease and the leading cause of death in women, undermining patients’ survival and quality of life. Modern techniques of surgery and radiotherapy allow for the obtaining of good results in terms of survival, however they cause long-term side effects that persist over time, such as lymphedema and neuropathy. Similarly, the advent of new therapies such as endocrine therapy revolutionized breast cancer outcomes, but side effects are still present even in years of follow-up after cure. Besides the side effects of medical and surgical therapy, breast cancer is a real disruption in patients’ lives considering quality of life-related aspects such as the distortion of body image, the psychological consequences of the diagnosis, and the impact on family dynamics. Therefore, the doctor-patient relationship is central to providing the best support both during treatment and afterwards. The aim of this review is to summarize the consequences of medical and surgical treatment on breast cancer patients and to emphasize the importance of early prevention of side effects to improve patients’ quality of life.

Background: We hypothesized that non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with a tumor positive for single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of the Excision Repair Cross Complementation Group 1 (ERCC-1) gene could be more genetically instable and consequently more responsive to a programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) blockade. Methods: We evaluated the T19007C and C8092A ERCC-1 SNPs by pyrosequencing assay, on tumor specimens from two independent cohorts of patients who relapsed after one or more prior systemic treatments for advanced NSCLC and who received nivolumab (3 mg/kg intravenously every 2 weeks) as part of the Italian Expanded Access Program. We aimed to assess the outcome of enrolled subjects according to the ERCC-1 SNPs status, to evaluate the role of these polymorphisms as putative biomarkers associated with a response/clinical benefit to anti-PD-1 therapies. Results: Of the 45 patients included in the final analysis, 21 (47%) and 16 (36%) were positive for the T19007C and C8092A polymorphic genotype (PG), respectively. In univariate analyses, overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) were shorter in patients with the T19007C PG, but neither difference achieved statistical significance (P = 0.131 and P = 0.717, respectively). The presence of the C8092A PG was associated with a longer OS and PFS, although statistical significance was only reached for PFS (P = 0.112 and P = 0.025, respectively). These results were confirmed by multivariate analyses. The response rate was only significantly higher in patients with the C8092A PG vs. wild type ERCC-1 (62 vs. 7%, P < 0.001). Conclusions: Results from this hypothesis generating pilot study, provided suggestive evidence that a subgroup of NSCLC patients could benefit differently from nivolumab according to the C8092A ERCC-1 SNP status. However, these data warrant further investigation.