Mark Roderic Jolly

Prof. Dr. Mark Roderic Jolly

1. Professor and Director of Manufacturing, Cranfield University, Bedford, UK
+1
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

25Years (2002-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
26 April 2018 in Production Planning & Control
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Miying YangMiying Yang
Miying Yang
PSPalie Smart
Palie Smart
MKMukesh Kumar
Mukesh Kumar
Mark Roderic JollyMark Roderic Jolly
Mark Roderic Jolly
SESteve Evans
Steve Evans
Shifting supply chains from linear to closed-loop models is an important step towards circular economy. This paper investigates business model innovation for circular supply chains, and proposes that product-service systems (PSS) business models can enhance the circularity of supply chains through value creation in inner circles, circling long and cascading use circles. It adopts an exploratory case study method of a large Chinese manufacturing firm operating a traditional product-based business model and three types of PSS business models (i.e. product-, use- and result-oriented PSSs). The supply chain operations of the four distinct business models are analysed and their associated circularities are discussed. The findings show that business models akin to result-oriented PSS, have tighter and more efficient cycles of supply chain operations; which means, the repair, reuse and remanufacturing system is faster and the rate is higher. This research contributes to a better understanding of the relationship between business model innovation and supply chain circularity.

3 July 2019 in Energies
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Konstantinos SalonitisKonstantinos Salonitis
Konstantinos Salonitis
Mark Roderic JollyMark Roderic Jolly
Mark Roderic Jolly
Emanuele PagoneEmanuele Pagone
Emanuele Pagone
MPMICHAIL PAPANIKOLAOU
MICHAIL PAPANIKOLAOU
Considering the manufacturing of automotive components, there exists a dilemma around the substitution of traditional cast iron (CI) with lighter metals. Currently, aluminum alloys, being lighter compared to traditional materials, are considered as a more environmentally friendly solution. However, the energy required for the extraction of the primary materials and manufacturing of components is usually not taken into account in this debate. In this study, an extensive literature review was performed to estimate the overall energy required for the manufacturing of an engine cylinder block using (a) cast iron and (b) aluminum alloys. Moreover, data from over 100 automotive companies, ranging from mining companies to consultancy firms, were collected in order to support the soundness of this investigation. The environmental impact of the manufacturing of engine blocks made of these materials is presented with respect to the energy burden; the “cradle-to-grave approach” was implemented to take into account the energy input of each stage of the component life cycle starting from the resource extraction and reaching to the end-of-life processing stage. Our results indicate that, although aluminum components contribute toward reduced fuel consumption during their use phase, the vehicle distance needed to be covered in order to compensate for the up-front energy consumption related to the primary material production and manufacturing phases is very high. Thus, the substitution of traditional materials with lightweight ones in the automotive industry should be very thoughtfully evaluated.

1 January 2016 in Procedia CIRP
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Konstantinos SalonitisKonstantinos Salonitis
Konstantinos Salonitis
BZBinxu Zeng
Binxu Zeng
HMHamid Mehrabi
Hamid Mehrabi
Mark Roderic JollyMark Roderic Jolly
Mark Roderic Jolly
Casting is one of the oldest, most challenging and energy intensive manufacturing processes. A typical modern casting process contains six different stages, which are classified as melting, alloying, moulding, pouring, solidification and finishing respectively. At each stage, high level and precision of process control is required. The energy efficiency of casting process can be improved by using novel alterations, such as the Constrained Rapid Induction Melting Single Shot Up-casting process. Within the present study the energy consumption of casting processes is analyzed and areas were great savings can be achieved are discussed. Lean thinking is used to identify waste and to analyse the energy saving potential for casting industry

1 November 2016 in Journal of Cleaner Production
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Konstantinos SalonitisKonstantinos Salonitis
Konstantinos Salonitis
Mark Roderic JollyMark Roderic Jolly
Mark Roderic Jolly
BZBinxu Zeng
Binxu Zeng
HMHamid Mehrabi
Hamid Mehrabi
The CRIMSON (Constrained Rapid Induction Melting Single Shot Up-Casting) method uses a rapid induction furnace to melt just enough metal for a single mould rather than bulk melting used in traditional casting process. The molten metal is then transferred to a computer – controlled platform to complete the counter-gravity up filling. The highly controlled metal flow is pushed into the mould to finish the pouring and solidification. In the present paper the energy saving capability of CRIMSON approach is compared with conventional sand casting process. The paper focuses on the energy and resource efficiency optimization of casting stages through simulation and life cycle assessment analysis simulation for proposing alternative means for the better performance of such processes. It is proven that the CRIMSON process can produce high quality castings with higher energy efficiency and lower environmental impact


1 October 2018 in Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
CACynthia Adu
Cynthia Adu
Mark Roderic JollyMark Roderic Jolly
Mark Roderic Jolly
Vijay Kumar ThakurVijay Kumar Thakur
Vijay Kumar Thakur