Micol Rossini

Dr. Micol Rossini

Remote Sensing of Environmental Dynamics Laboratory, University of Milano – Bicocca, Milan, Italy
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

21Years (2006-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 October 2009 in Remote Sensing of Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MMMichele Meroni
Michele Meroni
Micol RossiniMicol Rossini
Micol Rossini
LGLuis Guanter
Luis Guanter
LALuis Alonso
Luis Alonso
URUwe Rascher
Uwe Rascher
JMJ. Moreno
J. Moreno

24 March 2015 in Geophysical Research Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Xi YangXi Yang
Xi Yang
JTJianwu Tang
Jianwu Tang
JMJohn F. Mustard
John F. Mustard
JLJung‐Eun Lee
Jung‐Eun Lee
Micol RossiniMicol Rossini
Micol Rossini
ARAndrew D. Richardson
Andrew D. Richardson
Previous studies have suggested that solar‐induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) is correlated with Gross Primary Production (GPP). However, it remains unclear to what extent this relationship is due to absorbed photosynthetically active radiation (APAR) and/or light use efficiency (LUE). Here we present the first time series of near‐surface measurement of canopy‐scale SIF at 760 nm in temperate deciduous forests. SIF correlated with GPP estimated with eddy covariance at diurnal and seasonal scales (r2 = 0.82 and 0.73, respectively), as well as with APAR diurnally and seasonally (r2 = 0.90 and 0.80, respectively). SIF/APAR is significantly positively correlated with LUE and is higher during cloudy days than sunny days. Weekly tower‐based SIF agreed with SIF from the Global Ozone Monitoring Experiment‐2 (r2 = 0.82). Our results provide ground‐based evidence that SIF is directly related to both APAR and LUE and thus GPP, and confirm that satellite SIF can be used as a proxy for GPP.

22 September 2021 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MMMirco Migliavacca
Mirco Migliavacca
TMTalie Musavi
Talie Musavi
MMMiguel D. Mahecha
Miguel D. Mahecha
JNJacob A. Nelson
Jacob A. Nelson
JKJürgen Knauer
Jürgen Knauer
MRMarkus Reichstein
Markus Reichstein
The leaf economics spectrum1,2 and the global spectrum of plant forms and functions3 revealed fundamental axes of variation in plant traits, which represent different ecological strategies that are shaped by the evolutionary development of plant species2. Ecosystem functions depend on environmental conditions and the traits of species that comprise the ecological communities4. However, the axes of variation of ecosystem functions are largely unknown, which limits our understanding of how ecosystems respond as a whole to anthropogenic drivers, climate and environmental variability4,5. Here we derive a set of ecosystem functions6 from a dataset of surface gas exchange measurements across major terrestrial biomes. We find that most of the variability within ecosystem functions (71.8%) is captured by three key axes. The first axis reflects maximum ecosystem productivity and is mostly explained by vegetation structure. The second axis reflects ecosystem water-use strategies and is jointly explained by variation in vegetation height and climate. The third axis, which represents ecosystem carbon-use efficiency, features a gradient related to aridity, and is explained primarily by variation in vegetation structure. We show that two state-of-the-art land surface models reproduce the first and most important axis of ecosystem functions. However, the models tend to simulate more strongly correlated functions than those observed, which limits their ability to accurately predict the full range of responses to environmental changes in carbon, water and energy cycling in terrestrial ecosystems7,8.

4 August 2022 in Remote Sensing of Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
KBKatja Berger
Katja Berger
MMMiriam Machwitz
Miriam Machwitz
Marlena KyckoMarlena Kycko
Marlena Kycko
SKShawn C. Kefauver
Shawn C. Kefauver
SWShari Van Wittenberghe
Shari Van Wittenberghe
MSMartin Schlerf
Martin Schlerf
Remote detection and monitoring of the vegetation responses to stress became relevant for sustainable agriculture. Ongoing developments in optical remote sensing technologies have provided tools to increase our understanding of stress-related physiological processes. Therefore, this study aimed to provide an overview of the main spectral technologies and retrieval approaches for detecting crop stress in agriculture. Firstly, we present integrated views on: i) biotic and abiotic stress factors, the phases of stress, and respective plant responses, and ii) the affected traits, appropriate spectral domains and corresponding methods for measuring traits remotely. Secondly, representative results of a systematic literature analysis are highlighted, identifying the current status and possible future trends in stress detection and monitoring. Distinct plant responses occurring under shortterm, medium-term or severe chronic stress exposure can be captured with remote sensing due to specific light interaction processes, such as absorption and scattering manifested in the reflected radiance, i.e. visible (VIS), near infrared (NIR), shortwave infrared, and emitted radiance, i.e. solar-induced fluorescence and thermal infrared (TIR). From the analysis of 96 research papers, the following trends can be observed: increasing usage of satellite and unmanned aerial vehicle data in parallel with a shift in methods from simpler parametric approaches towards more advanced physically-based and hybrid models. Most study designs were largely driven by sensor availability and practical economic reasons, leading to the common usage of VIS-NIR-TIR sensor combinations. The majority of reviewed studies compared stress proxies calculated from single-source sensor domains rather than using data in a synergistic way. We identified new ways forward as guidance for improved synergistic usage of spectral domains for stress detection: (1) combined acquisition of data from multiple sensors for analysing multiple stress responses simultaneously (holistic view); (2) simultaneous retrieval of plant traits combining multi-domain radiative transfer models and machine learning methods; (3) assimilation of estimated plant traits from distinct spectral domains into integrated crop growth models. As a future outlook, we recommend combining multiple remote sensing data streams into crop model assimilation schemes to build up Digital Twins of agroecosystems, which may provide the most efficient way to detect the diversity of environmental and biotic stresses and thus enable respective management decisions.

3 July 2015 in Global Change Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
URUwe Rascher
Uwe Rascher
LALuis Alonso
Luis Alonso
ABA. Burkart
A. Burkart
CCC. Cilia
C. Cilia
Sergio CogliatiSergio Cogliati
Sergio Cogliati
FZFrantišek Zemek
František Zemek

15 April 2008 in Remote Sensing of Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RCR Colombo
R Colombo
MMMichele Meroni
Michele Meroni
AMA Marchesi
A Marchesi
LBLorenzo Busetto
Lorenzo Busetto
Micol RossiniMicol Rossini
Micol Rossini
CPC Panigada
C Panigada