Sergey Kravtsov

Prof. Sergey Kravtsov


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

29Years (1998-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
12 July 2007 in Geophysical Research Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ATAnastasios Tsonis
Anastasios Tsonis
KSKyle Swanson
Kyle Swanson
SKSergey Kravtsov
Sergey Kravtsov

1 November 2005 in Journal of Climate
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SKSergey Kravtsov
Sergey Kravtsov
DKDmitri Kondrashov
Dmitri Kondrashov
MGM. Ghil
M. Ghil
Predictive models are constructed to best describe an observed field’s statistics within a given class of nonlinear dynamics driven by a spatially coherent noise that is white in time. For linear dynamics, such inverse stochastic models are obtained by multiple linear regression (MLR). Nonlinear dynamics, when more appropriate, is accommodated by applying multiple polynomial regression (MPR) instead; the resulting model uses polynomial predictors, but the dependence on the regression parameters is linear in both MPR and MLR.The basic concepts are illustrated using the Lorenz convection model, the classical double-well problem, and a three-well problem in two space dimensions. Given a data sample that is long enough, MPR successfully reconstructs the model coefficients in the former two cases, while the resulting inverse model captures the three-regime structure of the system’s probability density function (PDF) in the latter case.A novel multilevel generalization of the classic regression procedure is introduced next. In this generalization, the residual stochastic forcing at a given level is subsequently modeled as a function of variables at this level and all the preceding ones. The number of levels is determined so that the lag-0 covariance of the residual forcing converges to a constant matrix, while its lag-1 covariance vanishes.This method has been applied to the output of a three-layer, quasigeostrophic model and to the analysis of Northern Hemisphere wintertime geopotential height anomalies. In both cases, the inverse model simulations reproduce well the multiregime structure of the PDF constructed in the subspace spanned by the dataset’s leading empirical orthogonal functions, as well as the detailed spectrum of the dataset’s temporal evolution. These encouraging results are interpreted in terms of the modeled low-frequency flow’s feedback on the statistics of the subgrid-scale processes.

13 April 2011 in Climate Dynamics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MWMarcia Glaze Wyatt
Marcia Glaze Wyatt
SKSergey Kravtsov
Sergey Kravtsov
ATAnastasios A. Tsonis
Anastasios A. Tsonis

1 November 2005 in Journal of Climate
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DKDmitri Kondrashov
Dmitri Kondrashov
SKSergey Kravtsov
Sergey Kravtsov
ARA. W. Robertson
A. W. Robertson
MGM. Ghil
M. Ghil
Global sea surface temperature (SST) evolution is analyzed by constructing predictive models that best describe the dataset’s statistics. These inverse models assume that the system’s variability is driven by spatially coherent, additive noise that is white in time and are constructed in the phase space of the dataset’s leading empirical orthogonal functions. Multiple linear regression has been widely used to obtain inverse stochastic models; it is generalized here in two ways. First, the dynamics is allowed to be nonlinear by using polynomial regression. Second, a multilevel extension of classic regression allows the additive noise to be correlated in time; to do so, the residual stochastic forcing at a given level is modeled as a function of variables at this level and the preceding ones. The number of variables, as well as the order of nonlinearity, is determined by optimizing model performance.The two-level linear and quadratic models have a better El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO) hindcast skill than their one-level counterparts. Estimates of skewness and kurtosis of the models’ simulated Niño-3 index reveal that the quadratic model reproduces better the observed asymmetry between the positive El Niño and negative La Niña events. The benefits of the quadratic model are less clear in terms of its overall, cross-validated hindcast skill; this model outperforms, however, the linear one in predicting the magnitude of extreme SST anomalies.Seasonal ENSO dependence is captured by incorporating additive, as well as multiplicative forcing with a 12-month period into the first level of each model. The quasi-quadrennial ENSO oscillatory mode is robustly simulated by all models. The “spring barrier” of ENSO forecast skill is explained by Floquet and singular vector analysis, which show that the leading ENSO mode becomes strongly damped in summer, while nonnormal optimum growth has a strong peak in December.

1 August 2009 in Journal of Climate
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AHAndrew Mc C. Hogg
Andrew Mc C. Hogg
WDWilliam K. Dewar
William K. Dewar
PBPavel Berloff
Pavel Berloff
SKSergey Kravtsov
Sergey Kravtsov
DHDavid Hutchinson
David Hutchinson
Small-scale variation in wind stress due to ocean–atmosphere interaction within the atmospheric boundary layer alters the temporal and spatial scale of Ekman pumping driving the double-gyre circulation of the ocean. A high-resolution quasigeostrophic (QG) ocean model, coupled to a dynamic atmospheric mixed layer, is used to demonstrate that, despite the small spatial scale of the Ekman-pumping anomalies, this phenomenon significantly modifies the large-scale ocean circulation. The primary effect is to decrease the strength of the nonlinear component of the gyre circulation by approximately 30%–40%. This result is due to the highest transient Ekman-pumping anomalies destabilizing the flow in a dynamically sensitive region close to the western boundary current separation. The instability of the jet produces a flux of potential vorticity between the two gyres that acts to weaken both gyres.

1 January 2010 in Geophysical Research Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JHJanel L. Hanrahan
Janel L. Hanrahan
SKSergey Kravtsov
Sergey Kravtsov
PRPaul J. Roebber
Paul J. Roebber