Stephen Butler

Dr. Stephen Butler


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

22Years (2005-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 May 2020 in Neurocomputing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ZFZixiang Fei
Zixiang Fei
Erfu YangErfu Yang
Erfu Yang
DLDavid Li
David Li
SBStephen Butler
Stephen Butler
WIWinifred Ijomah
Winifred Ijomah
HZHuiyu Zhou
Huiyu Zhou

1 January 2005 in Neuropsychologia
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SBStephen Butler
Stephen Butler
IGIain Gilchrist
Iain Gilchrist
DBD. Michael Burt
D. Michael Burt
DPD.I. Perrett
D.I. Perrett
EJE. Jones
E. Jones
MHM. Harvey
M. Harvey

15 November 2019 in Journal of Global Health
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MPMario A Parra
Mario A Parra
SBStephen Butler
Stephen Butler
WMWilliam J. McGeown
William J. McGeown
LNLouise A Brown Nicholls
Louise A Brown Nicholls
DRDavid Robertson
David Robertson

1 April 2005 in Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AGA. Ganguli
A. Ganguli
CSC. Steward
C. Steward
SBStephen Butler
Stephen Butler
GPG. J. Philips
G. J. Philips
SMS. T. Meikle
S. T. Meikle
MGM. Helen Grant
M. Helen Grant

27 June 2018 in Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DRDavid Robertson
David Robertson
AMAndrew Mungall
Andrew Mungall
DWDerrick G Watson
Derrick G Watson
KWKimberley A. Wade
Kimberley A. Wade
SNSophie J. Nightingale
Sophie J. Nightingale
SBStephen Butler
Stephen Butler
Our reliance on face photos for identity verification is at odds with extensive research which shows that matching pairs of unfamiliar faces is highly prone to error. This process can therefore be exploited by identity fraudsters seeking to deceive ID checkers (e.g., using a stolen passport which contains an image of a similar looking individual to deceive border control officials). In this study we build on previous work which sought to quantify the threat posed by a relatively new type of fraud: morphed passport photos. Participants were initially unaware of the presence of morphs in a series of face photo arrays and were simply asked to detect which images they thought had been digitally manipulated (i.e., “images that didn’t look quite right”). All participants then received basic information on morph fraud and rudimentary guidance on how to detect such images, followed by a morph detection training task (Training Group, n = 40), or a non-face control task (Guidance Group, n = 40). Participants also completed a post-guidance/training morph detection task and the Models Face Matching Test (MFMT). Our findings show that baseline morph detection rates were poor, that morph detection training significantly improved the identification of these images over and above basic guidance, and that accuracy in the mismatch condition of the MFMT correlated with morph detection ability. The results are discussed in relation to potential countermeasures for morph-based identity fraud.

1 December 2006 in Brain Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SBStephen Butler
Stephen Butler
MHMonika Harvey
Monika Harvey