Vincent Lamberti

Dr. Vincent Lamberti

Consolidated Nuclear Security, Tennessee, USA
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

30Years (1997-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 April 1997 in Chemistry of Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
VLVincent Lamberti
Vincent Lamberti
MRMark Andrew Rodriguez
Mark Andrew Rodriguez
JTJ. D. Trybulski
J. D. Trybulski
ANAlexandra Navrotsky
Alexandra Navrotsky
HLH. B. Liu
H. B. Liu

15 April 2022 in Organic Electronics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EMEva Mutunga
Eva Mutunga
CDChristopher D'ANgelo
Christopher D'ANgelo
AGAndrew Grizzle
Andrew Grizzle
VLVincent Lamberti
Vincent Lamberti
PTPawan Tyagi
Pawan Tyagi

29 March 2024 in IEEE Sensors Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JWJoshua Winslow
Joshua Winslow
VLVincent Lamberti
Vincent Lamberti
MPMichael P. Palmer
Michael P. Palmer
JTJustin C. Tokash
Justin C. Tokash
MDMichael DeVinney
Michael DeVinney
TDTim Dallas
Tim Dallas
This paper describes the design, assembly, and implementation of a hand-held, magnetic-field-based sensor system that can be adapted for a variety of sensing applications. The miniaturized system is based on the Chemical Identification by Magneto-Elastic Sensing (ChIMES) technology, which uses three concentric solenoid coils to wirelessly interrogate a sensor body comprised of a response material coupled to a magnetoelastic wire. The response material expands when it encounters a target, imposing mechanical stress on the wire and altering its magnetic permeability. The sensor bodies are passive, requiring no external power source, and they are small, measuring about 15 mm in length and 0.3 mm in diameter. Up to four sensor bodies can be configured as an evenly spaced linear array. The sensor system operates by applying a low-frequency, current-stabilized, filtered triangle wave to a uniform-density excitation coil to switch the magnetic domains within the wire. The responses from the sensors are picked up by a detection coil as stress-induced changes in the Faraday voltage, and the strong magnetic field induced by the excitation coil in the detection coil is nullified by a cancellation coil reverse-wound in series with the detection coil. The responses of the sensors in an array are separated in time by a linear gradient DC biasing coil. The sensors can be interrogated through metallic and nonmetallic barriers. The signals from the detection coil and the excitation coil are digitized by a pair of bipolar analog-to-digital converters. A Raspberry Pi single-board computer and associated software performs data acquisition and controls all aspects of the sensor system hardware. The program allows the user to select the number of sensors in the array, the type of signal that is being collected, and the number of samples to take. The program also allows for signal processing of the sensor data, such as baseline correction. The program can differentiate sensor peaks from each other and calculate the magnitude of each sensor response with less than 1% error. The data is then displayed along with a graph of the signal.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BDBishnu R. Dahal
Bishnu R. Dahal
AGAndrew Grizzle
Andrew Grizzle
CDChristopher D’angelo
Christopher D’angelo
VLVincent Lamberti
Vincent Lamberti
PTPawan Tyagi
Pawan Tyagi
Molecular spintronics devices (MSDs) attempt to harness molecules’ quantum state, size, and configurable attributes for application in computer devices—a quest that began more than 70 years ago. In the vast number of theoretical studies and limited experimental attempts, MSDs have been found to be suitable for application in memory devices and futuristic quantum computers. MSDs have recently also exhibited intriguing spin photovoltaic-like phenomena, signaling their potential application in cost-effective and novel solar cell technologies. The molecular spintronics field’s major challenge is the lack of mass-fabrication methods producing robust magnetic molecule connections with magnetic electrodes of different anisotropies. Another main challenge is the limitations of conventional theoretical methods for understanding experimental results and designing new devices. Magnetic tunnel junction-based molecular spintronics devices (MTJMSDs) are designed by covalently connecting paramagnetic molecules across an insulating tunneling barrier. The insulating tunneling barrier serves as a mechanical spacer between two ferromagnetic (FM) electrodes of tailorable magnetic anisotropies to allow molecules to undergo many intriguing phenomena. Our experimental studies showed that the paramagnetic molecules could produce strong antiferromagnetic coupling between two FM electrodes, leading to a dramatic large-scale impact on the magnetic electrode itself. Recently, we showed that the Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS) was effective in providing plausible insights into the observation of unusual magnetic domains based on the role of single easy-axis magnetic anisotropy. Here, we experimentally show that the response of a paramagnetic molecule is dramatically different when connected to FM electrodes of different easy-axis anisotropies. Motivated by our experimental studies, here, we report on an MCS study investigating the impact of the simultaneous presence of two easy-axis anisotropies on MTJMSD equilibrium properties. In-plane easy-axis anisotropy produced multiple magnetic phases of opposite spins. The multiple magnetic phases vanished at higher thermal energy, but the MTJMSD still maintained a higher magnetic moment because of anisotropy. The out-of-plane easy-axis anisotropy caused a dominant magnetic phase in the FM electrode rather than multiple magnetic phases. The simultaneous application of equal-magnitude in-plane and out-of-plane easy-axis anisotropies on the same electrode negated the anisotropy effect. Our experimental and MCS study provides insights for designing and understanding new spintronics-based devices.

23 June 2017 in Analytical Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NHNahla A. Hatab
Nahla A. Hatab
NCNichole A. Crane
Nichole A. Crane
DMDavid K. Mee
David K. Mee
LHL. Neville Howell
L. Neville Howell
LMLarry R. Mooney
Larry R. Mooney
VLVincent Lamberti
Vincent Lamberti

14 November 2019 in Sensors
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
VLVincent Lamberti
Vincent Lamberti
DMDavid Mee
David Mee
PAPeter Angelo
Peter Angelo
JPJeffrey Preston
Jeffrey Preston
A passive gamma detection technology, consisting of a fielded sensor and a separate analysis system, is described. The sensor is a small cylinder, about 2.5 mm in diameter and 15 mm in length. It requires no onboard power sources or physical connections for power or data transfer, and retains its cumulative response to radiation. The sensor consists of an amorphous magnetoelastic wire held in a longitudinally-stressed state by a radiation-sensitive material. When the radiation-sensitive material is subjected to gamma radiation, it mechanically degrades, relaxing the stress on the wire and lowering the wire’s magnetic permeability. The changes in permeability are observed by switching the magnetic domains in the wire and measuring the reduction in the Faraday voltage as the stress is diminished. The analysis package is built around an excitation-detection coil set and can communicate wirelessly with the sensor through a metallic or nonmetallic barrier at distances up to about 25 mm. The sensor response is linear up to a dose of at least 7 kGy.