In this paper, class F fly ash, bottom ash, polypropylene fibers, and nylon fibers were evaluated as potential stabilizers in enhancing volume change properties of sulfate rich expansive soils. As a part of the research evaluation, a comprehensive laboratory experimental program was designed and conducted on two different subgrade soils from two locations in Texas. Four dosage levels of each stabilizer, two compaction moisture content levels, and 14 days curing period were investigated. Volume change behavioral tests including volumetric free swell, volumetric shrinkage strain, and vertical swell pressure tests were conducted on both isolated stabilizer treated and combined ash-fiber stabilized soils. Ash stabilizers showed improvements in reducing swelling, shrinkage, and plasticity characteristics by 20–80% whereas fibers treatments resulted in varied improvements. In combined treatments, class F fly ash mixed with nylon fibers was the most effective treatment on both Dallas and Arlington soils, where t...
1 June 2006 in Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
The engineering properties of expansive soils are conventionally improved through the use of additives such as fly ash, lime, and chemical additives. Such soils are often referred to as stabilized or modified or treated expansive soils. The soil-water characteristic curves (SWCC) of two expansive soils from Texas were measured both in natural and stabilized conditions using the pressure plate apparatus in the suction range of 0-1,000 kPa. The SWCC results are used to interpret the expansive soil behavior due to stabilizer treatment. In addition, relationships were developed between the basic soil and stabilizer properties such as water content, dry density, liquid limit, plastic limit, and stabilizer dosages and the model constants of the SWCC formulation of Fredlund and Xing via multiple linear regression analysis. The analysis showed that higher coefficients of correlations can be achieved by using six independent soil properties. The comparisons between the predicted and measured volumetric water conte...
1 August 2016 in International Journal of Geomechanics
In this paper, equations that were proposed in the literature over the past four decades to estimate or predict the variation of the resilient modulus with respect to soil suction for pavement base-course materials and subgrade soils are summarized into three groups: (1) empirical relationships, (2) constitutive models incorporating the soil suction into applied shearing or confining stresses, and (3) constitutive models extending the independent stress state variable approach. Two equations selected from each of the groups (a total of six equations) are used to predict the resilient modulus–soil suction correlations for three compacted subgrade soils. Strengths and limitations of these widely used equations are discussed based on the comparisons between the measurements and predictions. The key objective of the state-of-the-art research summarized in this paper is for assisting practicing engineers to choose suitable equations for the rational prediction of the resilient modulus taking into acco...
This paper provides a summary of nineteen empirical procedures or techniques that are available for predicting or estimating the shear strength of unsaturated soils. While six of these procedures use the soil-water retention curve (SWRC) as a tool; the remainder thirteen procedures are mathematical formulations for the prediction or estimation of the shear strength of an unsaturated soil. A comprehensive analysis is undertaken to predict the variation of shear strength with respect to matric suction of twenty soils using the six prediction equations that use SWRC. The studies presented in this paper highlight the suitability of these equations for successful predictions of the shear strength of the unsaturated soils.
Core Ideas: The similarity between SFCC and SWCC, and hysteresis of SFCC are reviewed. The SFCC and SWCC of two fine‐grained soils are measured and analyzed. No quantitative similarity is found between the measured SFCC and SWCC. Several concerns regarding the similarity between SFCC and SWCC are discussed. The drying–wetting and freezing–thawing cycles significantly influence the soil pore water in the vadose zone in permafrost and seasonally frozen regions. The soil‐freezing characteristic curve (SFCC) describes the relationship between unfrozen water content and subzero temperature in a soil at frozen condition. Several studies suggest that the SFCC of a frozen saturated soil is similar to soil‐water characteristic curve (SWCC), which describes the relationship between water content and suction for a soil under unfrozen unsaturated condition. In the present study, the similarity between SFCC and SWCC, and possible reasons for the hysteresis of SFCC are succinctly reviewed. The SFCC and SWCC of two Canadian soils were measured and critically interpreted to understand the fundamental behavior of SFCC in comparison with the SWCC. The observed hysteresis of SFCC for the two soils was mainly associated with the supercooling of pore water. The measured SFCC and SWCC of the two soils show quantitative dissimilarity rather than similarity. This may be attributed to the experimental limitations and possible fundamental differences between drying–wetting and freezing–thawing processes. In addition, several concerns regarding the similarity between SFCC and SWCC are discussed. The present study highlights that rigorous investigations are required for better understanding the SFCC to facilitate its use for cold‐region engineering practice applications.