Don Isarakorn

Prof. Dr. Don Isarakorn

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

22Years (2005-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
14 January 2011 in Smart Materials and Structures
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DIDon Isarakorn
Don Isarakorn
DBD Briand
D Briand
PJP Janphuang
P Janphuang
ASA Sambri
A Sambri
SGS Gariglio
S Gariglio
NRN F de Rooij
N F de Rooij

7 April 2010 in Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DIDon Isarakorn
Don Isarakorn
ASA Sambri
A Sambri
PJP Janphuang
P Janphuang
DBD Briand
D Briand
SGS Gariglio
S Gariglio
NRN F de Rooij
N F de Rooij

5 September 2014 in Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PJPattanaphong Janphuang
Pattanaphong Janphuang
RLRobert A. Lockhart
Robert A. Lockhart
DIDon Isarakorn
Don Isarakorn
SHSimon Henein
Simon Henein
DBDanick Briand
Danick Briand
NRNico F. de Rooij
Nico F. de Rooij
This paper presents an analytical and experimental study of a compact configuration to harvest energy from a rotating gear using piezoelectric microelectromechanical system harvesters. The reported configuration realizes a contact-type frequency up-conversion mechanism in order to generate useful electrical energy. The up-conversion mechanism was achieved using an atomic force microscope (AFM)-like piezoelectric cantilever plucked by the teeth of the rotating gear that could be eventually driven by an oscillating mass. This paper describes relevant design guidelines for harvesting energy from the low-frequency mechanical movement of a rotating gear through analytical modeling and finite element method (FEM) simulation followed by experimental validation. Different harvester configurations are investigated to identify the optimal configuration in terms of the output energy and energy conversion efficiency. The latter results are reported for the first time because of the implementation of an original concept based on the coupling of the harvester with a rotational flywheel. The experimental results reveal that free vibrations of the harvester after plucking contribute significantly to the output energy and efficiency. By adding a proof mass, the efficiency of the system can be greatly improved. For plucking speeds between 3 and 19 r/s, average output powers in the order of tens of microwatts were obtained for continuous plucking. By combining interaction energy, friction, and energy absorption, between the harvester and inertial mass, the maximum efficiency of the impact piezoelectric harvesters was found to be 1.4%. The efficiency results obtained were compared with the noncontact magnetic plucking approach further demonstrating the potential of our concept. Finally, different tip-gear materials combinations were evaluated showing the importance of their nature on the reliability of the presented configuration.

15 October 2020 in Sensors
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Panu ThainiramitPanu Thainiramit
Panu Thainiramit
PYPhonexai Yingyong
Phonexai Yingyong
DIDon Isarakorn
Don Isarakorn
This work investigated the mechanical and electrical behaviors of piezoelectric and triboelectric energy harvesters (PEHs and TEHs, respectively) as potential devices for harvesting impact-driven energy. PEH and TEH test benches were designed and developed, aiming at harvesting low-frequency mechanical vibration generated by human activities, for example, a floor-tile energy harvester actuated by human footsteps. The electrical performance and behavior of these energy harvesters were evaluated and compared in terms of absolute energy and power densities that they provided and in terms of these energy and power densities normalized to unit material cost. Several aspects related to the design and development of PEHs and TEHs as the energy harvesting devices were investigated, covering the following topics: construction and mechanism of the energy harvesters; electrical characteristics of the fabricated piezoelectric and triboelectric materials; and characterization of the energy harvesters. At a 4 mm gap width between the cover plate and the stopper (the mechanical actuation components of both energy harvesters) and a cover plate pressing frequency of 2 Hz, PEH generated 27.64 mW, 1.90 mA, and 14.39 V across an optimal resistive load of 7.50 kΩ, while TEH generated 1.52 mW, 8.54 µA, and 177.91 V across an optimal resistive load of 21 MΩ. The power and energy densities of PEH (4.57 mW/cm3 and 475.13 µJ/cm3) were higher than those of TEH (0.50 mW/cm3, and 21.55 µJ/cm3). However, when the material cost is taken into account, TEH provided higher power and energy densities per unit cost. Hence, it has good potential for upscaling, and is considered well worth the investment. The advantages and disadvantages of PEH and TEH are also highlighted as main design factors.

1 August 2018 in Sensors and Actuators A: Physical
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PPPhosy Panthongsy
Phosy Panthongsy
DIDon Isarakorn
Don Isarakorn
PJPattanaphong Janphuang
Pattanaphong Janphuang
KHKazuhiko Hamamoto
Kazuhiko Hamamoto

1 November 2021 in Sensors and Actuators A: Physical
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PYPhonexai Yingyong
Phonexai Yingyong
Panu ThainiramitPanu Thainiramit
Panu Thainiramit
SJSubhawat Jayasvasti
Subhawat Jayasvasti
NTNicharas Thanach-Issarasak
Nicharas Thanach-Issarasak
DIDon Isarakorn
Don Isarakorn